Average rating: | Rated 4.5 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
The article is well written. and I commend the author for his styles.
However, I suggest that the following should be addressed:
1. The author should include one recommendation in the abstracts.
2. The author should explicitly include the main contribution, which should be a summary of the main findings, in the introduction .
3. The author should inlcude some suggestions for future research in the conclusions.
4. The author should check the references and be sure they all adopt a uniform format.
5. The paper should be proofread.
I strongly recommend that the paper is published after these minor revisions.