Average rating: | Rated 4.5 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
This paper provides a wealth of references on the enactment of ethical principles in implemented information systems, and discussions on the questions consequently raised. The bibliography would be of great interest to researchers interested in the ethics of digital systems. A concern is that the concepts of Ubuntu, and therefore Ubuntu ethics, remain vague.
It is hoped that the following comments may aid in strengthening the paper:
Figure 2 remains slightly unclear as to the concept of "closer communities". It may be improved by adding a more comprehensive description of the Ubuntu concept "immediate community", and its envisaged position on the continuum of "Individual", "Organisation" and "Society at Large". Also consider adding the word " community " to the text "Immediate" in the illustration.
The heading " Ubuntu is Ethics" on page 11 should presumably specify the "is" in capital letters, since the heading refers to Information System Ethics, abbreviated as "IS Ethics".
The citation Samuel (1995) does not align with the "Samuel (2024)" in the Bibliography.