Average rating: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
Positives:
Areas of improvement:
The case study "Responding to Cybersecurity Threats in the Healthcare Sector" provides a valuable account of a significant cybersecurity incident, with strong points in its clear description of events, use of real-world examples, and focus on strengths and continuous improvement. However, to enhance the case study's academic rigor and practical value, the author should deepen the analysis, engage more with existing literature, improve the structure and clarity, and offer more detailed recommendations. Addressing these areas for improvement will make the work more comprehensive, insightful, and applicable to broader contexts.