Home
DrugRxiv Drug Repurposing Network Medicine
REPO4EU Meet the team Drug Repurposing Research Collection Conference
Blog
Register Dashboard
Search
Home
DrugRxiv Drug Repurposing Network Medicine
REPO4EU Meet the team Drug Repurposing Research Collection Conference
My ScienceOpen

Register Dashboard
Search
200
views
cited by
0
1
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0
shares
    155
    similar
     All similar
    • Review: found
    Is Open Access

    Review of 'Psychosocial risks in the working environment : Approaches to formative risk assessment'

    Reviewer:
    Inviter role(s): AUTHOR
    Publication date of review:
    Bookmark
    3
    Psychosocial risks in the working environment : Approaches to formative risk assessmentCrossref
    Important work, but could be enriched with more discussions and made better in terms of language.
    Average rating:
        Rated 3.5 of 5.
    Level of importance:
        Rated 4 of 5.
    Level of validity:
        Rated 4 of 5.
    Level of completeness:
        Rated 3 of 5.
    Level of comprehensibility:
        Rated 2 of 5.
    Competing interests:
    		None

    Reviewed article

    • Record: found
    • Abstract: found
    • Article: found
    Is Open Access

    Psychosocial risks in the working environment : Approaches to formative risk assessment

    Stefan Paulus, Alexander Scheidegger, Jasmin Rabensteiner … (2023)
    The following explanations are based on the central reference points and results of the basic research project on psychosocial risks in the world of work, which was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). The aim of this project was to develop a formative risk assessment of psychosocial risks in the world of work with a special focus on the dynamic interdependencies between gainful employment and care work as well as structural work stress and subjectively perceived work stress. The result of this project is a theoretical-generic model of a formative risk assessment, which can be specifically configured for different stakeholder groups and was operationalized as a psychotherapeutic medical product via the Innosuisse project "SELBA" (Self Recognize, Understand, Change and Monitor Work Stresses and Strains).
    Article 0 comments Cited 1 times    Rated -3 of 5. – based on 2 reviews
    Preprint version 1
      Bookmark

      Review information

      DOI:: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-SOCSCI.APWS63S.v1.RJIPGZ
      License:
      This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com.

      ScienceOpen disciplines: Sociology,Psychology,General social science,Mathematical modeling & Computation
      Keywords: Risk assessment,psychosocial risks,transactional stress model,subject science, system dynamics,blended therapy

      Review text

      The authors have presented a theoretical-generic model of formative risk assessment for psychosocial risks in the work environment. The work is based on a long-running field project. This is an appreciable attempt.

      What is important as per my assessment is that they have highlighted the importance of community-based modelling, visual boundary objects, policy design, and continuous problem updating to process interactions between structural workloads and work-related stress. Such efforts are necessary for the progress of the field.

      I would also have loved to see a discussion on the disparities between geographies/economies in the practical aspect of implementing risk assessment protocols.

      I presume that this manuscript was translated from another language to English, and hence there appear to be some issues with language, puncuation etc. For instance, there is repeated references to 'Chapters' within the manuscript, which is somewhat unusual for article length pieces such as this one.

      The language within Figure 1 and Figure 2 is also not English. Such shortcomings create an issue with comprehension.

      Comments

      wrote:

      Many thanks Chinchu Chithrangathan for the appreciative review. We have addressed the suggestions for improvement as follows:

      "I would also have loved to see a discussion on the disparities between geographies/economies in the practical aspect of implementing risk assessment protocols."

      • This aspect is still a research desideratum. Such data could only be accessed after the formative risk assessment has run for a certain period of time. We have included this desideratum in the last chapter as a future research task

      "I presume that this manuscript was translated from another language to English, and hence there appear to be some issues with language, puncuation etc. For instance, there is repeated references to 'Chapters' within the manuscript, which is somewhat unusual for article length pieces such as this one."

      • Yes, the two research projects were conducted in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. The article also translated from German into English with the help of a translation agency. The 2nd version was revised again.

      "The language within Figure 1 and Figure 2 is also not English. Such shortcomings create an issue with comprehension."

      • The figures are screenshots from the software and cannot be translated directly. We have explained the contents in the text.
      2023-05-31 11:39 UTC
      +1

      Comment on this review

      Version and Review History
      Published Version
      Preprint version 2
      2
      Preprint version 1
      Reviewed by Roghieh NooripourReviewed by Chinchu Chithrangathan