Average rating: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Competing interests: | The article is organized systematically and logically. |
Review Post:
Average rating: Level of importance; Level of validity: Level of completeness: Level of comprehensibility:
The publication is relevant to the academic community and provides important information.
The work represents a new approach or new findings compared to other publications in the field.
The hypothesis is clearly formulated.
It is the strict argument.
The data are robust, well controlled, and statistically significant.
The interpretation is balanced and supported by the data.
Appropriate and state-of-the-art methods are used.
The authors refer to the appropriate academic context.
The authors provide or cite all the information to follow their findings or argumentation.
They cite all relevant publications in the field.
The language is correct and easy to understand for an academic in the field.
The figures are well represented and the titles are correctly described.
The article is organized systematically and logically.