Average rating: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
The problem of potential cancer risk resulted from low dose ionizing radiation due to CT exams is of high importance.
There are two opposite points of view in the scientific society today: the official position of ICRP is based on the opinion that any radiation dose will lead to cancer risk after time (Linear non-threshold theory).
The other position is based on real data from studies of patients, exposed to CT and followed-up for a long time after the exposure, that often delivers little evidience of cancer cases related to the radiation dose from CT (and not affected by reverse causation), and wide confidence intervals for risk estimates.
Obviously, the second is more problematic, more resiurce and time-consuming but however more informative for science, than using handsome ICRP raiation risk coefficients obtained from LSS cohort studies on acute exposure to high levels of gamma-neutron radiation.
Regarding this paper - this study contains well described dosimetry but nothing about the cancer risk analyses.
The conclusion "The estimated cancer risk is 1 cancer per 1000 to 10,000 CT procedures. " (in Abstract) is only appropriate for the Discussion chapter, provided with the proper link on the source of information.
Recommendation:
I would like to recommend this paper to publish with change in heading "Assessment of the Radiation Exposure of Disabled People Undergoing Different Computed Tomography Scans"
For the future work, I would like to recommend to perform the follow-up of those patients to assess late effects (particularly cancer).
Due to local exposure scenario, it will be useful to assess the absorbed doses for each individual patient using DICOM records.