Average rating: | Rated 4.5 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
The author needs to check the abstract very careful and correct grammatical errors in it.
The conclusion of the paper is not well stated and more work need to be done on recommendation.
In all the paper is a good one.