Average rating: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 2 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
The article discusses the basic stuff, rather than providing depth into the concepts.
The abstract section lacks the motivation and the aim of the paper. It gives a general discussion of what have been discussed as a gist, and then the same definitions and points have been discussed elaborately in the latter parts of the paper.
Repetitive statements- and no fruitful conclusions at the end.
This is more of an introductory paper rather than a research article.
Language is correct and easy to understand- references are citied correctly- but could have been more specific and detailed.
That's all