Average rating: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
This is a nice work done by the authors. I have couple of suggestions to the authors to improve the manuscript.
1. During self polymerization of dopamine, whether there will be any H2O2 generation? if so how much effect it will have on the mechanism?
2. In the introduction, authors should try to mention rationale of using dopamine a little biot more to help resesarch having more ideas on the approach.
3. Why the shape of figure 2 and 3 are different?
4. A seperate section of discussion and conclusion would be good to direct readers on important things. Most of the statement in the conslusion are matching with discussion rather than as concluding remarks.