45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0
shares
    • Review: found
    Is Open Access

    Review of 'Psychological Capital of Resilience for Students with Disabilities in Open Distance e-Learning Institutions post-Covid 19 Pandemic'

    AUTHOR
    Bookmark
    4
    Psychological Capital of Resilience for Students with Disabilities in Open Distance e-Learning Institutions post-Covid 19 PandemicCrossref
    This manuscript addresses a significant and timely topic regarding psychological capital (PsyCap)
    Average rating:
        Rated 4 of 5.
    Level of importance:
        Rated 5 of 5.
    Level of validity:
        Rated 3 of 5.
    Level of completeness:
        Rated 3 of 5.
    Level of comprehensibility:
        Rated 4 of 5.
    Competing interests:
    None

    Reviewed article

    • Record: found
    • Abstract: found
    • Article: found
    Is Open Access

    Psychological Capital of Resilience for Students with Disabilities in Open Distance e-Learning Institutions post-Covid 19 Pandemic

    The Covid-19 pandemic has exacerbated the risks that impacted the mental health of students with disabilities, particularly in Open Distance e-Learning (ODeL) institutions. Students with disabilities, already facing significant barriers to participation and learning, encountered additional challenges with online instruction during the pandemic. Experts in inclusive education revealed pronounced disparities in access to quality, inclusive education, as well as significant learning gaps among students with disabilities (SWD) both during and after the pandemic. Students with disabilities have suffered disproportionate educational consequences alongside health-related deprivations. This study examined how SWD were impacted post-Covid-19 pandemic and the psychological capital (PsyCap) of resilience as their protective source. The study undertook a narrative review of literature from secondary data on Google Scholar from 2020–2024. The study was underpinned by a conceptual framework rooted in the PsyCap of resilience to promote mental health and academic success in vulnerable student populations. The pandemic intensified concerns about equitable access to quality education and highlighted the limitations of support systems for SWD. The findings aim to improve adaptive coping mechanisms for these students, ensuring they are better equipped to navigate future crises through flexible learning modalities and inclusive technologies. This study underscores the critical need for resilient, inclusive educational frameworks in ODeL settings to foster the success and well-being of SWD in a rapidly changing educational landscape.
      Bookmark

      Review information

      10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-SOCSCI.A181HW.v1.RIIVLH
      This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com.

      Education
      inclusive education,psychological capital of resilience,enabling factors,higher education,students with disabilities,Open Distance e-Learning (ODeL)

      Review text

      A primary concern is the theoretical framework's development and placement. The PsyCap theory, whilst present, needs earlier introduction and stronger integration with the ODeL context. The author should clearly establish how PsyCap's components (hope, self-efficacy, optimism, and resilience) specifically relate to SWD in distance learning environments. They may consider developing a conceptual model that illustrates these relationships and their influence on student outcomes in ODeL settings.

      The literature review would benefit from thematic rather than chronological organisation. Suggested themes includes (i) Impact of COVID-19 on SWD, (ii)  ODeL accessibility and support, (iii) PsyCap interventions, and (iv) institutional responses. Each theme may present current knowledge, identifying gaps, and demonstrate interconnections. I also feel there is a need for consistency in terminology throughout the manuscript - notably, the interchangeable use of "students with disabilities" and "people with disabilities" should be standardised, preferably using "students with disabilities" throughout to maintain focus on the educational context.

      The methodology section requires substantial enhancement. Whilst a narrative review approach is appropriate, the paper needs to detail the systematic process employed, including search strategies, databases used beyond Google Scholar, inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening process, and quality assessment methods. A flow diagram illustrating the literature selection process would strengthen this section. the analysis technique in line with narrative review should be included and will make presentation and discussion easier for the reader.

      The findings presentation would benefit from more systematic organisation and clearer distinction between literature findings and author interpretation. Consider incorporating tables to summarise key findings and using visual representations where appropriate. The discussion section needs stronger critical analysis, comparing findings with existing theories and addressing confirmations, disputes and contradictions in the literature. The practical implications section should provide more specific, actionable recommendations for ODeL institutions, particularly regarding PsyCap intervention implementation and support service enhancement.

      Technical aspects requiring attention include citation consistency (APA vs Harvard), reference list accuracy, and formatting standardisation. The author should ensure all citations follow the required format and that references are current and accurate. The manuscript would benefit from professional editing to enhance clarity and flow. (I am aware that this will be addressed through the journal).

      The future research section should be expanded to identify specific research gaps, suggest methodological approaches, and propose potential research questions. Consider addressing the need for longitudinal studies, cross-cultural investigations, and implementation research in ODeL contexts.

      Despite these areas needing improvement, the manuscript shows promise and addresses an important gap in the literature. The focus on PsyCap as a framework for supporting SWD in ODeL environments is particularly relevant given the ongoing transformation of higher education post-COVID-19. With the suggested revisions, this paper could make a valuable contribution to the field of inclusive distance education and student support services.

       

      The author should prioritise: (1) strengthening the theoretical framework and its integration with ODeL contexts, (2) enhancing the methodology description, (3) reorganising the literature review thematically, (4) developing more specific practical implications, and (5) maintaining consistency in terminology throughout the manuscript. These revisions would significantly improve the paper's scholarly contribution and practical utility for ODeL institutions supporting students with disabilities.

      Comments

      Comment on this review