Average rating: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
The paper effectively highlights the role that national accounting and economic metrics have played in shaping this perception by establishing a production boundary that determines what is considered productive and what is not. The argument is well-supported and demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the complex economic and political dynamics at play. However, the paper could benefit from a more detailed discussion of specific examples or case studies that illustrate the author's argument in practice.