Home
Publishing
DrugRxiv
Drug Repurposing
Network Medicine
About
REPO4EU
Meet the team
Drug Repurposing Research Collection
Conference
Blog
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Search
Home
Publishing
DrugRxiv
Drug Repurposing
Network Medicine
About
REPO4EU
Meet the team
Drug Repurposing Research Collection
Conference
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Search
8
views
0
references
Top references
cited by
0
Cite as...
0 reviews
Review
0
comments
Comment
0
recommends
+1
Recommend
0
collections
Add to
0
shares
Share
Twitter
Sina Weibo
Facebook
Email
2,245
similar
All similar
Record
: found
Abstract
: not found
Book Chapter
: not found
Report of the human rights committee: volume II - 97th session; 98th session; 99th session
K. Communication No. 1572/2007, Mathioudakis v. Greece (Decision adopted on 19 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
other
Publication date
(Print):
September 24 2014
Publisher:
UN
Read this book at
Publisher
Buy book
Review
Review book
Invite someone to review
Bookmark
Cite as...
There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Related collections
University of Huddersfield Press
Author and book information
Book Chapter
Publication date (Print):
September 24 2014
Pages
: 444-446
DOI:
10.18356/d6ca14ac-en
SO-VID:
79bd0a1d-d764-4465-adea-a6479c5beb64
History
Data availability:
Comments
Comment on this book
Sign in to comment
Book chapters
pp. 1
A. Communication No. 1206/2003, R.M. and S.I. v. Uzbekistan (Views adopted on 10 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 18
C. Communication No. 1232/2003, Pustovalov v. Russian Federation (Views adopted on 23 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 26
D. Communication No. 1246/2004, Gonzalez Muñoz v. Guyana (Views adopted on 25 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 38
E. Communication No. 1284/2004, Kodirov v. Uzbekistan (Views adopted on 20 October 2009, ninety-seventh session)
pp. 47
F. Communication No. 1312/2004, Latifulin v. Kyrgyzstan (Views adopted on 10 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 53
G. Communication No. 1338/2005, Kaldarov v. Kyrgyzstan (Views adopted on 18 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 62
H. Communication No. 1363/2005, Gayoso Martínez v. Spain (Views adopted on 19 October 2009, ninety-seventh session)
pp. 71
I. Communication No. 1369/2005, Kulov v. Kyrgyzstan (Views adopted on 26 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 87
K. Communication No. 1392/2005, Lukyanchik v. Belarus (Views adopted on 21 October 2009, ninety-seventh session)
pp. 103
M. Communication No. 1401/2005, Kirpo v. Tajikistan (Views adopted on 27 October 2009, ninety-seventh session)
pp. 110
N. Communication No. 1425/2005, Marz v. Russian Federation (Views adopted on 21 October 2009, ninety-seventh session)
pp. 119
O. Communication No. 1442/2005, Kwok v. Australia (Views adopted on 23 October 2009, ninety-seventh session)
pp. 132
P. Communication No. 1465/2006, Kaba v. Canada (Views adopted on 25 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 153
Q. Communication No. 1467/2006, Dumont v. Canada (Views adopted on 16 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 168
R. Communication No. 1491/2006, Blücher von Wahlstatt v. The Czech Republic (Views adopted on 2 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 179
S. Communication No. 1502/2006, Marinich v. Belarus (Views adopted on 16 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 192
T. Communication No. 1519/2006, Khostikoev v. Tajikistan (Views adopted on 22 October 2009, ninety-seventh session)
pp. 198
U. Communication No. 1520/2006, Mwamba v. Zambia (Views adopted on 10 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 205
V. Communication No. 1544/2007, Hamida v. Canada (Views adopted on 18 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 216
W. Communication No. 1552/2007, Lyashkevich v. Uzbekistan (Views adopted on 23 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 236
Y. Communication No. 1559/2007, Hernandez v. Philippines (Views adopted on 26 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 244
Z. Communication No. 1565/2007, Gonçalves et al. v. Portugal (Views adopted on 18 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 251
AA. Communication No. 1577/2007, Usaev v. Russian Federation (Views adopted on 16 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 261
BB. Communication No. 1588/2007, Benaziza v. Algeria (Views adopted on 26 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 281
CC. Communication No. 1589/2007, Gapirjanov v. Uzbekistan (Views adopted on 18 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 289
DD. Communication Nos. 1593-1603/2007, Jung et al. v. Republic of Korea (Views adopted on 23 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 299
EE. Communication No. 1615/2007, Zavrel v. Czech Republic (Views adopted on 27 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 308
FF. Communication No. 1619/2007, Pestaño v. Philippines (Views adopted on 23 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 318
GG. Communication No. 1623/2007, Guerra de la Espriella v. Colombia (Views adopted on 18 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 327
HH. Communication No. 1629/2007, Fardon v. Australia (Views adopted on 18 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 336
II. Communication No. 1635/2007, Tillman v. Australia (Views adopted on 18 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 362
KK. Communication No. 1742/2007, Gschwind v. Czech Republic (Views adopted on 27 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 368
LL. Communication No. 1797/2008, Mennen v. The Netherlands (Views adopted on 27 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 377
MM. Communication No. 1799/2008, Georgopoulos et al. v. Greece (Views adopted on 29 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 389
NN. Communication No. 1870/2009, Sobhraj v. Nepal (Views adopted on 27 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 398
A. Communication No. 1079/2002, A. et al. v. Uzbekistan (Decision adopted on 19 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 406
B. Communication No. 1174/2003, Minboev v. Tajikistan (Decision adopted on 19 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 415
D. Communication No. 1343/2005, Dimkovich v. Russian Federation (Decision adopted on 26 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 419
E. Communication No. 1471/2006, Rodríguez Domínguez et al. v. Spain (Decision adopted on 27 October 2009, ninety-seventh session
pp. 423
F. Communication No. 1522/2006, N.T. v. Kyrgyzstan (Decision adopted on 19 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 426
G. Communication No. 1523/2006, Tiyagarajah v. Sri Lanka (Decision adopted on 19 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 430
H. Communication No. 1537/2006, Gerashchenko v. Belarus (Decision adopted on 23 October 2009, ninety-seventh session)
pp. 434
I. Communication No. 1541/2007, Gaviria Lucas v. Colombia (Decision adopted on 27 October 2009, ninety-seventh session)
pp. 439
J. Communication No. 1555/2007, Suils Ramonet v. Spain (Decision adopted on 27 October 2009, ninety-seventh session)
pp. 444
K. Communication No. 1572/2007, Mathioudakis v. Greece (Decision adopted on 19 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 447
L. Communication No. 1573/2007, Šroub v. Czech Republic (Decision adopted on 27 October 2009, ninety-seventh session)
pp. 455
M. Communication No. 1609/2007, Chen v. The Netherlands (Decision adopted on 26 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 460
N. Communication No. 1616/2007, Manzano et al v. Colombia (Decision adopted on 19 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 468
O. Communication No. 1618/2007, Brychta v. Czech Republic (Decision adopted on 27 October 2009, ninety-seventh session)
pp. 476
Q. Communication No. 1747/2008, Bibaud v. Canada (Decision adopted on 19 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 484
R. Communication No. 1754/2008, Loth v. Germany (Decision adopted on 23 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 492
S. Communication No. 1778/2008, Novotny v. Czech Republic (Decision adopted on 19 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 497
T. Communication No. 1793/2008, Marin v. France (Decision adopted on 27 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 504
U. Communication No. 1794/2008, Barrionuevo Álvarez and Bernabé Pérez v. Spain (Decision adopted on 19 March 2010, ninety-eighth session)
pp. 508
V. Communication No. 1868/2009, Andersen v. Denmark (Decision adopted on 26 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 518
W. Communication No. 1869/2009, Sanjuán v. Spain (Decision adopted on 26 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 521
X. Communication No. 1872/2009, D.J.D.G. et al v. Canada (Decision adopted on 26 July 2010, ninety-ninth session)
pp. 530
Follow-up activities under the Optional Protocol
Similar content
2,245
Crisis in the Netherlands and the Final Phase of Antwerp’s Decline (1572–1587)
Authors:
Herman Van Der Wee
Nuestro pesar, nuestra aflicción/tunetuliniliz, tucucuca; Memorias en lengua náhuatl enviadas a Felipe II hacia 1572
Authors:
C. LUTZ
Variability of interpretations of coronary CT in the ED: A single center experience with 5 readers and 1572 patients
Authors:
Eric J. Feldmann
,
Gregory Parnes
,
Alyssa Simeone
…
See all similar