Home
Publishing
DrugRxiv
Drug Repurposing
Network Medicine
About
REPO4EU
Meet the team
Drug Repurposing Research Collection
Conference
Blog
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Search
Home
Publishing
DrugRxiv
Drug Repurposing
Network Medicine
About
REPO4EU
Meet the team
Drug Repurposing Research Collection
Conference
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Search
7
views
0
references
Top references
cited by
0
Cite as...
0 reviews
Review
0
comments
Comment
0
recommends
+1
Recommend
0
collections
Add to
0
shares
Share
Twitter
Sina Weibo
Facebook
Email
1,233
similar
All similar
Record
: found
Abstract
: not found
Book Chapter
: not found
Report of the human rights committee: Volume II (Part One) – 100th session; 101st session; 102nd session
LL. Communication No. 1758/2008, Jessop v. New Zealand (Views adopted on 29 March 2011, 101st session)
other
Publication date
(Print):
September 24 2014
Publisher:
UN
Read this book at
Publisher
Buy book
Review
Review book
Invite someone to review
Bookmark
Cite as...
There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Related collections
Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology
Author and book information
Book Chapter
Publication date (Print):
September 24 2014
Pages
: 421-442
DOI:
10.18356/79fa732f-en
SO-VID:
4525416e-3430-4a5d-8776-429cb6133456
History
Data availability:
Comments
Comment on this book
Sign in to comment
Book chapters
pp. 1
A. Communication No. 1304/2004, Khoroshenko v. Russian Federation (Views adopted on 29 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 19
B. Communication No. 1346/2005, Tofanyuk v. Ukraine (Views adopted on 20 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 26
C. Communication No. 1354/2005, Sudalenko v. Belarus (Views adopted on 19 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 34
D. Communication No. 1383/2005, Katsora et al. v. Belarus (Views adopted on 25 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 40
E. Communication No. 1390/2005, Koreba v. Belarus (Views adopted on 25 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 48
F. Communication No. 1402/2005, Krasnov v. Kyrgyzstan (Views adopted on 29 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 61
G. Communication No. 1410/2005, Yevdokimov and Rezanov v. Russian Federation (Views adopted on 21 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 70
H. Communication No. 1412/2005, Butovenko v. Ukraine (Views adopted on 19 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 93
I. Communication No. 1449/2006, Umarov v. Uzbekistan (Views adopted on 19 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 104
J. Communication No. 1458/2006, González v. Argentina (Views adopted on 17 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 110
K. Communication No. 1470/2006, Toktakunov v. Kyrgyzstan (Views adopted on 28 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 120
L. Communication No. 1478/2006, Kungurov v. Uzbekistan (Views adopted on 20 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 139
M. Communication No. 1499/2006, Iskandarov v. Tajikistan (Views adopted on 30 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 147
N. Communication No. 1503/2006, Akhadov v. Kyrgyzstan (Views adopted on 25 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 156
O. Communication No. 1507/2006, Sechremelis et al. v. Greece (Views adopted on 25 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 173
P. Communication No. 1517/2006, Rastorguev v. Poland (Views adopted on 25 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 183
Q. Communication No. 1530/2006, Bozbey v. Turkmenistan (Views adopted on 27 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 188
R. Communication No. 1531/2006, Cunillera Arias v. Spain (Views adopted on 26 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 195
S. Communication No. 1532/2006, Sedljar and Lavrov v. Estonia (Views adopted on 29 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 206
T. Communication No. 1535/2006, Shchetka v. Ukraine (Views adopted on 19 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 221
U. Communication No. 1545/2007, Gunan v. Kyrgyzstan (Views adopted on 25 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 233
V. Communication No. 1556/2007, Novaković v. Serbia (Views adopted on 21 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 240
W. Communication No. 1557/2007, Nystrom et al. v. Australia (Views adopted on 18 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 263
X. Communication No. 1564/2007, X.H.L v. Netherlands (Views adopted on 22 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 273
Y. Communication No. 1581/2007, Drda v. Czech Republic (Views adopted on 27 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 279
Z. Communication No. 1586/2007, Lange v. Czech Republic (Views adopted on 13 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 285
AA. Communication No. 1604/2007, Zalesskaya v. Belarus (Views adopted on 28 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 294
BB. Communication No. 1605/2007, Zyuskin v. Russian Federation (Views adopted on 19 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 306
CC. Communication No. 1608/2007, L.M.R. v. Argentina (Views adopted on 29 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 317
DD. Communication No. 1610/2007, L.N.P. v. Argentina (Views adopted on 18 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 326
EE. Communication No. 1611/2007, Bonilla Lerma v. Colombia (Views adopted on 26 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 337
FF. Communication No. 1620/2007, J.O. v. France (Views adopted on 23 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 352
GG. Communication No. 1621/2007, Raihman v. Latvia (Views adopted on 28 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 365
HH. Communication 1633/2007, Avadanov v. Azerbaijan (Views adopted on 25 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 377
II. Communication Nos. 1642–1741/2007, Jeong et al. v. Republic of Korea (Views adopted on 24 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 400
JJ. Communication No. 1751/2008, Aboussedra et al. v. Libyan Arab Jamahiriya (Views adopted on 25 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 410
KK. Communication No. 1756/2008, Moidunov and Zhumbaeva v. Kyrgyzstan (Views adopted on 19 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 421
LL. Communication No. 1758/2008, Jessop v. New Zealand (Views adopted on 29 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 443
MM. Communication No. 1760/2008, Cochet v. France (Views adopted on 21 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 452
NN. Communication No. 1761/2008, Giri et al. v. Nepal (Views adopted on 24 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 465
OO. Communication No. 1763/2008, Pillai et al. v. Canada (Views adopted on 25 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 488
PP. Communication No. 1769/2008, Ismailov v. Uzbekistan (Views adopted on 25 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 496
QQ. Communication No. 1776/2008, Ali Bashasha and Hussein Bashasha v.Libyan Arab Jamahiriya (Views adopted on 20 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 505
RR. Communication No. 1777/2008, Crochet v. France (Views adopted on 25 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 515
SS. Communication No. 1780/2008, Aouabdia et al. v. Algeria (Views adopted on 22 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 531
TT. Communication No. 1783/2008, Machado Bartolomeu v. Portugal (Views adopted on 19 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 537
UU. Communication No. 1812/2008, Levinov v. Belarus (Views adopted on 26 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 544
VV. Communication No. 1813/2008, Akwanga v. Cameroon (Views adopted on 22 March 2011, 101st session)
pp. 559
WW. Communication No. 1818/2008, McCallum v. South Africa (Views adopted on 25 October 2010, 100th session)
pp. 568
XX. Communication No. 1876/2009, Singh v. France (Views adopted on 22 July 2011, 102nd session)
pp. 592
ZZ. Communication No. 1959/2010, Warsame v. Canada (Views adopted on 21 July 2011, 102nd session)
Similar content
1,233
House of Representatives, 101st Cong
Authors:
Hearing on the Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Select Education of the Committee on Education and Labor
Crisis of Theory: Bob Jessop's Theory of Capitalist Reproduction
Authors:
Werner Bonefeld
101st meeting of the APA Convention
Authors:
S wu
See all similar