87
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Zanj is published by Pluto Journals, an Open AcZcess publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Smart Citations
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
      View Citations

      See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

      scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Boring of Hard Boards

      Published
      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Zanj: The Journal of Critical Global South Studies
            Pluto Journals
            2515-2149
            25 January 2025
            : 8
            : 1-2
            : 260-272
            Affiliations
            [1 ] International Institute of Social History, the Netherlands;
            Author information
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1950-8352
            Article
            10.13169/zanjglobsoutstud.8.1.0013
            69958e5b-0d60-4065-8c41-5e3f321d473e
            Copyright @ 2024

            Published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International ( CC BY 4.0). Users are allowed to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially), as long as the authors and the publisher are explicitly identified and properly acknowledged as the original source.

            History
            Categories

            Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
            Political science,General social science,Development studies,Cultural studies
            Emic approach,International Labour Organization,Palermo Protocol,relational inequality,split labor markets,unintended consequences

            References

            1. Acker Joan. Inequality Regimes. Gender & Society. Vol. 20(4):441–464. 2006. SAGE Publications. [Cross Ref]

            2. Behrends Andrea, Park Sung-Joon, Rottenburg Richard. Travelling Models in African Conflict Management. 2014. BRILL. [Cross Ref]

            3. Bonacich Edna. A Theory of Ethnic Antagonism: The Split Labor Market. American Sociological Review. Vol. 37(5)1972. SAGE Publications. [Cross Ref]

            4. Burley David G.. Charles Tilly — Durable Inequality. Left History: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Historical Inquiry and Debate. Vol. 8(1)2002. York University Libraries. [Cross Ref]

            5. Galperin Bella L, Punnett Betty Jane, Ford David, Lituchy Terri R. An emic-etic-emic research cycle for understanding context in under-researched countries. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. Vol. 22(1):7–35. 2022. SAGE Publications. [Cross Ref]

            6. Gamoran Adam. Sociology’s Role in Responding to Inequality: Introduction to the Special Collection. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World. Vol. 7:2021. SAGE Publications. [Cross Ref]

            7. Honig Emily. Burning Incense, Pledging Sisterhood: Communities of Women Workers in the Shanghai Cotton Mills, 1919-1949. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. Vol. 10(4):700–714. 1985. University of Chicago Press. [Cross Ref]

            8. Kabeer Naila. Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women's Empowerment. Development and Change. Vol. 30(3):435–464. 1999. Wiley. [Cross Ref]

            9. Keese Alexander. Slow Abolition within the Colonial Mind: British and French Debates about “Vagrancy”, “African Laziness”, and Forced Labour in West Central and South Central Africa, 1945–1965. International Review of Social History. Vol. 59(3):377–407. 2014. Cambridge University Press (CUP). [Cross Ref]

            10. Morning Ann. SCIENTIFIC RACISM REDUX?<i>The Many Lives of a Troublesome Idea</i>. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race. Vol. 12(1):187–199. 2015. Cambridge University Press (CUP). [Cross Ref]

            11. Morris Michael W., Leung Kwok, Ames Daniel, Lickel Brian. Views from Inside and Outside: Integrating Emic and Etic Insights about Culture and Justice Judgment. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 24(4):781–796. 1999. Academy of Management. [Cross Ref]

            12. Oya Carlos. Labour Regimes and Workplace Encounters between China and AfricaChina-Africa and an Economic Transformation. p. 239–262. 2019. Oxford University PressOxford. [Cross Ref]

            13. Peled Yoav, Shafir Gershon. Split Labor Market and the State: The Effect of Modernization on Jewish Industrial Workers in Tsarist Russia. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 92(6):1435–1460. 1987. University of Chicago Press. [Cross Ref]

            14. Radforth Ian. Bush Workers and Bosses Logging in Northern Ontario 1900–1980. 1987. University of Toronto Press. [Cross Ref]

            15. Tomaskovic-Devey Donald. The Relational Generation of Workplace Inequalities. Social Currents. Vol. 1(1):51–73. 2014. SAGE Publications. [Cross Ref]

            16. Van Der Linden Marcel. IntroductionHumanitarian Intervention and Changing Labor Relations. p. 1–45. 2011. BRILL. [Cross Ref]

            17. van der Linden Marcel. Workers of the World. 2008. BRILL. [Cross Ref]

            18. van der Linden Marcel. Charles Tilly’s Historical Sociology. International Review of Social History. Vol. 54(2):237–274. 2009. Cambridge University Press (CUP). [Cross Ref]

            Comments

            Comment on this article