Liberals and Muslims: Philosophy and Conquest

If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

Arab Studies Quarterly is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals. Furthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

scite_

Smart Citations

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Header Abstract Content Author and article information Notes Comments

Arab Studies Quarterly

Volume 37, Issue 1

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

Liberals and Muslims: Philosophy and Conquest

Published

research-article

Author(s): Shiraz Dossa

Publication date (Print): Winter 2015

Journal: Arab Studies Quarterly

Publisher: Pluto Journals

Keywords: liberal indecency, Kant, Mill, Montesquieu, anti-Muslimism, academic racism, liberal Jews, anti-Arab, anti-Semitism

Bookmark

Abstract

Content

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (doi): 10.13169

Journal ID (publisher-id): arabstudquar

Title: Arab Studies Quarterly

Publisher: Pluto Journals

ISSN (Print): 02713519

ISSN (Electronic): 20436920

Publication date (Print): Winter 2015

Volume: 37

Issue: 1

Pages: 54-72

Article

Publisher ID: arabstudquar.37.1.0054

DOI: 10.13169/arabstudquar.37.1.0054

SO-VID: 0442e20a-7db6-4de3-99ad-e959b36b9451

License:

All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

History

Notes

Merleau-Ponty (1969: xiii–xiv).
Said (1996: 54–58).
Said (1979: 27); Said (1980: xviii).
Said (1979: 235, 228, passim).
Said (1980: 89–90).
Schmitt (2003: 86–87).
Burke (1958: 64–65).
Arblaster (1986: 338, 310).
Melville (1966: 131–133).
In this article, my focus is fascism as the project of conquest and mastery. It was blatant in the liberal colonies and is pervasive in liberal states. This fascist analytic is similar to that articulated by Paxton, Horkheimer/Adorno, and Mosse—see Notes 11, 16, and 30. My analysis concedes the close link between fascism and capitalism. Indeed, economic exploitation was at the core of liberal colonial rule.
Paxton (2005: 49, 201–202).
Barry (1973: 125–127).
Waldron (1987: 144–146).
Schmitt (2003: parts I, II, IV).
Taylor (1994: 62–63, passim).
Horkheimer and Adorno (1972: 24, 44).
Bauman (1991: Preface x).
Lacan (2007: 18–19).
Fink (1995: 106–107).
Lacan (1992: 227).
Oliver (2007: 24, 26–27).
Horton (2008).
Oliver (2007: 26).
Arendt (1958: 6–7).
Fink (1995: 131).
Fink (1995: 132).
Aristotle (1946: 137–138, 111–115).
Dworkin (1978: 115, 125).
Sartre (2006: 169–170).
Mosse (1999: xii–xv).
Mills (1997: 1–3).
Goldberg (1993: 6–7).
Arendt (1958: 336, ix).
Kant (1998: 56–57).
Almond (2010: Ch. 2).
Kant (1959: 85).
Balibar (1991: 18–19).
Kant (1998: 130–133).
Kant (2006: 100 fn.).
Sand (2009); Yuval (2006).
Kant (1998: 135).
Battersby (2007: 70–81).
Bernasconi (2002); Bernasconi (2011).
Bernasconi (2002).
Kant (2003: 113).
Kleingeld (2007).
Weil ([1943] 1962: 199–203).
Bernasconi (2011: 302–303).
Larrimore (1999: 118, passim).
Finkelstein (1995: 90–94).
Todorov (1984: 5).
Mill (1956: 14, 7); Goldberg (2002: 64).
Mill (1962: 87).
Todorov (1984: 149–150).
Mill (1962: 336–337); Mill (1963: 376–381).
Goldberg (2002: 64–65, 71).
Losurdo (2011: 246–247).
Mill (1962: 336–348).
Pangle (1993: 85).
Richter (1977: 32–33).
Springborg (1987: 21–22).
Grosrichard (1998: xii–xiii).
Young (1978: 392–405).
Grosrichard (1998: 37).
Young (1978).
Shohat and Stam (1994: 161–165).
Ibid.
Keddie (2006: 31, 292–297).
Montesquieu (1973: 284).
Montesquieu (1989: 138–142; 248–250).
Montesquieu (1989: 250, 61, 462).
Ignatieff (2004); Berman (2004).
Walzer (2006); Slater (2007); Walzer (2007).
Greenwald (2007).
Zolo (2009: 137).

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] Merleau-Ponty (1969: xiii–xiv).

[2] Said (1996: 54–58).

[3] Said (1979: 27); Said (1980: xviii).

[4] Said (1979: 235, 228, passim).

[5] Said (1980: 89–90).

[6] Schmitt (2003: 86–87).

[7] Burke (1958: 64–65).

[8] Arblaster (1986: 338, 310).

[9] Melville (1966: 131–133).

[10] In this article, my focus is fascism as the project of conquest and mastery. It was blatant in the liberal colonies and is pervasive in liberal states. This fascist analytic is similar to that articulated by Paxton, Horkheimer/Adorno, and Mosse—see Notes 11, 16, and 30. My analysis concedes the close link between fascism and capitalism. Indeed, economic exploitation was at the core of liberal colonial rule.

[11] Paxton (2005: 49, 201–202).

[12] Barry (1973: 125–127).

[13] Waldron (1987: 144–146).

[14] Schmitt (2003: parts I, II, IV).

[15] Taylor (1994: 62–63, passim).

[16] Horkheimer and Adorno (1972: 24, 44).

[17] Bauman (1991: Preface x).

[18] Lacan (2007: 18–19).

[19] Fink (1995: 106–107).

[20] Lacan (1992: 227).

[21] Oliver (2007: 24, 26–27).

[22] Horton (2008).

[23] Oliver (2007: 26).

[24] Arendt (1958: 6–7).

[25] Fink (1995: 131).

[26] Fink (1995: 132).

[27] Aristotle (1946: 137–138, 111–115).

[28] Dworkin (1978: 115, 125).

[29] Sartre (2006: 169–170).

[30] Mosse (1999: xii–xv).

[31] Mills (1997: 1–3).

[32] Goldberg (1993: 6–7).

[33] Arendt (1958: 336, ix).

[34] Kant (1998: 56–57).

[35] Almond (2010: Ch. 2).

[36] Kant (1959: 85).

[37] Balibar (1991: 18–19).

[38] Kant (1998: 130–133).

[39] Kant (2006: 100 fn.).

[40] Sand (2009); Yuval (2006).

[41] Kant (1998: 135).

[42] Battersby (2007: 70–81).

[43] Bernasconi (2002); Bernasconi (2011).

[44] Bernasconi (2002).

[45] Kant (2003: 113).

[46] Kleingeld (2007).

[47] Weil ([1943] 1962: 199–203).

[48] Bernasconi (2011: 302–303).

[49] Larrimore (1999: 118, passim).

[50] Finkelstein (1995: 90–94).

[51] Todorov (1984: 5).

[52] Mill (1956: 14, 7); Goldberg (2002: 64).

[53] Mill (1962: 87).

[54] Todorov (1984: 149–150).

[55] Mill (1962: 336–337); Mill (1963: 376–381).

[56] Goldberg (2002: 64–65, 71).

[57] Losurdo (2011: 246–247).

[58] Mill (1962: 336–348).

[59] Pangle (1993: 85).

[60] Richter (1977: 32–33).

[61] Springborg (1987: 21–22).

[62] Grosrichard (1998: xii–xiii).

[63] Young (1978: 392–405).

[64] Grosrichard (1998: 37).

[65] Young (1978).

[66] Shohat and Stam (1994: 161–165).

[67] Ibid.

[68] Keddie (2006: 31, 292–297).

[69] Montesquieu (1973: 284).

[70] Montesquieu (1989: 138–142; 248–250).

[71] Montesquieu (1989: 250, 61, 462).

[72] Ignatieff (2004); Berman (2004).

[73] Walzer (2006); Slater (2007); Walzer (2007).

[74] Greenwald (2007).

[75] Zolo (2009: 137).

Arab Studies Quarterly

Liberals and Muslims: Philosophy and Conquest

Journal

Article

History

Categories

Comment on this article