99
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using community participation to assess acceptability of “ Contra Caries”, a theory-based, promotora-led oral health education program for rural Latino parents: a mixed methods study

      research-article
      , , ,
      BMC Oral Health
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Latino children experience more prevalent and severe tooth decay than non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black children. Few theory-based, evaluated and culturally appropriate interventions target parents of this vulnerable population. To fill this gap, the Contra Caries Oral Health Education Program, a theory-based, promotora-led education program for low-income, Spanish-speaking parents of children aged 1–5 years, was developed. This article describes qualitative findings of the acceptability of curriculum content and activities, presents the process of refinement of the curriculum through engaging the target population and promotoras, and presents results from the evaluation assessing the acceptability of the curriculum once implemented.

          Methods

          Focus groups were conducted with low-income Spanish-speaking parents of children 1–5 years living in a city in an agricultural area of California. Interviews were digitally recorded, translated and transcribed, checked for accuracy and the resulting data was thematically coded and analyzed using a social constructionist approach. The Contra Caries Oral Health Education Program was then implemented with a separate but similar sample, and after completing the program, participants were administered surveys asking about acceptability and favorite activities of the education program. Data were entered into a database, checked for accuracy, open-ended questions were categorized, and responses to close-ended questions counted.

          Results

          Twelve focus groups were conducted ( N = 51), 105 parents attended the Contra Caries Oral Health Education Program, and 83 parents filled out surveys. Complete attendance and retention was high (89 % and 90 %, respectively). This study found that their children’s oral health is a high priority. Parents were not only interested in, but actually attended classes focused on increasing their knowledge and skills with respect to early childhood oral health. The Contra Caries content and format was perceived as acceptable by parents. Strong opinions about curriculum content were expressed for including information on how caries starts and progresses, weaning from the bottle, oral health care for children and adults, motivational strategies for children’s tooth brushing, dental visits and cavity restorations.

          Conclusions

          The Contra Caries Oral Health Education Program was acceptable to low-income, Spanish-speaking parents of children 1–5 years. Participating in the curriculum development and revision process likely played an important role in the parents’ high acceptability of the program.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion.

          D Stokols (2015)
          Health promotion programs often lack a clearly specified theoretical foundation or are based on narrowly conceived conceptual models. For example, lifestyle modification programs typically emphasize individually focused behavior change strategies, while neglecting the environmental underpinnings of health and illness. This article compares three distinct, yet complementary, theoretical perspectives on health promotion: behavioral change, environmental enhancement, and social ecological models. Key strengths and limitations of each perspective are examined, and core principles of social ecological theory are used to derive practical guidelines for designing and evaluating community health promotion programs. Directions for future health promotion research are discussed, including studies examining the role of intermediaries (e.g., corporate decision-makers, legislators) in promoting the well-being of others, and those evaluating the duration and scope of intervention outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Qualitative methods to ensure acceptability of behavioral and social interventions to the target population.

            This paper introduces qualitative methods for assessing the acceptability of an intervention.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Maternal self-efficacy and 1-5-year-old children's brushing habits.

              This study investigates the relationships between maternal cognitive, behavioral, and psychosocial factors and brushing practices in low-income African-American preschool children. Data are from a population-based sample of 1021 African-American families with at least one child <6 years of age and living in the 39 low-income Census tracts in Detroit, Michigan. Analyses were limited to 1-5-year-old children and their mothers (n = 719). Mothers were surveyed about oral health-related self-efficacy (OHSE), knowledge about appropriate bottle use (KBU), knowledge about children's oral hygiene (KCOH), oral health fatalism (OHF), their own toothbrushing behavior, depressive symptoms (CES-D), parenting stress, practical social support, and their child's dental history. Children's 1-week reported brushing frequency was the main outcome measure. Analyses were conducted in SUDAAN to account for the complex sampling design. Children's 1-week brushing frequency (range 0-40) averaged 8.50 times per week among 1-3-year olds and 9.75 among the 4-5-year olds. Maternal OHSE was a strong and significant predictor of children's brushing frequency; for each unit increase in OHSE, 1-3-year olds were expected to brush 18% more frequently on average during 1 week [incidence density ratios (IDR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.28; P < 0.001], and 4-5-year olds were expected to brush 9% more often (IDR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.19; P < 0.10). Mothers' KCOH score was also significantly positively associated with brushing frequency; for each unit increase on the KCOH scale, 1-3-year olds were expected to brush 22% more frequently (IDR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.35; P < 0.001) and 4-5-year olds were expected to brush 13% more frequently (IDR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.26; P < 0.05). If a mother brushed her own teeth at bedtime during the week, her 1-3-year old child's brushing frequency was expected to increase by one-third (IDR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.12-1.60; P < 0.01) and among the 4-5-year olds, the child's frequency was expected to increase by one-quarter (IDR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.12-1.42; P < 0.001). Availability of help with transportation and financial support were also relevant variables for 1-3-year olds. Higher family income and dental insurance coverage were both positively associated with brushing among 4-5-year olds. Several maternal cognitive, behavioral, and psychosocial factors were associated with young children's brushing practices. Oral health-specific self-efficacy and knowledge measures are potentially modifiable cognitions; findings suggest that intervening on these factors could help foster healthy dental habits and increase children's brushing frequency early in life.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Kristin.Hoeft@ucsf.edu
                s_rios@umail.ucsb.edu
                pantojaestela2012@gmail.com
                judith.barker@ucsf.edu
                Journal
                BMC Oral Health
                BMC Oral Health
                BMC Oral Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6831
                3 September 2015
                3 September 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 103
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center to Address Disparities in Children’s Oral Health (CAN DO), 3333 California Street, Suite 485, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
                [ ]Department of Anthropology, History & Social Medicine, Center to Address Children’s Oral health Disparities (CAN DO), University of California San Francisco, 3333 California Street, Suite 485, San Francisco, CA 94143-0850 USA
                Article
                89
                10.1186/s12903-015-0089-4
                4558913
                26335081
                68d5e95c-3519-43a6-bb89-111c9661dd5a
                © Hoeft et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 22 February 2015
                : 25 August 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Dentistry
                Dentistry

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content93

                Cited by17

                Most referenced authors288