4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effectiveness of tomotherapy v s linear accelerator image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized pharyngeal cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a Taiwanese population-based propensity score-matched analysis

      research-article
      , MD 1,2 , , MS 1 , , MD, PhD 1,3 ,
      The British Journal of Radiology
      The British Institute of Radiology.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          This study used a population-based propensity score (PS)-matched analysis to compare the effectiveness of tomotherapy-based image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (referred to as T-IMRT) with that of linear accelerator based (referred to as L-IMRT) for clinically localized pharyngeal cancer (LPC, divided into nasopharyngeal cancer and non-nasopharyngeal cancer) with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

          Methods:

          Eligible LPC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2014 were identified among all citizens in Taiwan from the Health and Welfare Data Science Center database. A PS-matched sample based on the PS estimated from the covariables of interest was constructed to compare the effectiveness of T-IMRT with L-IMRT. In the primary analysis, overall survival (OS) was compared for assessment of effectiveness. We also evaluated freedom from local regional recurrence and pharyngeal cancer-specific survival and performed supplementary analyses.

          Results:

          The study population included 960 patients equally divided into two groups. OS did not differ significantly between the T-IMRT and L-IMRT groups (hazard ratio for death: 0.82, p = 0.15, 5-year OS rate: 79 and 74% for T-IMRT and L-IMRT, respectively), and there were no significant differences in the other endpoints or supplementary analyses.

          Conclusion:

          For LPC patients treated with definitive CCRT, we found no significant difference in disease control or survival between the T-IMRT and L-IMRT groups. However, further studies, especially randomized trials or studies focusing on other dimensions, such as quality of life, are needed.

          Advances in knowledge:

          We provide the first population-based study, as well as the largest study, on the clinical effectiveness of T-IMRT compared with L-IMRT in conjunction with CCRT in LPC patients.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          Br J Radiol
          Br J Radiol
          bjr
          The British Journal of Radiology
          The British Institute of Radiology.
          0007-1285
          1748-880X
          June 2018
          29 March 2018
          : 91
          : 1086
          : 20170947
          Affiliations
          [1 ] org-divisionDepartment of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital , Taichung, Taiwan
          [2 ] org-divisionDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Science, College of Health Care, China Medical University , Taichung, Taiwan
          [3 ] org-divisionSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University , Taichung, Taiwan
          Author notes
          Address correspondence to: Dr Chun-Ru Chien. E-mail: d16181@ 123456mail.cmuh.org.tw
          Article
          PMC6223294 PMC6223294 6223294 BJR-D-17-00947
          10.1259/bjr.20170947
          6223294
          29565652
          4b87dfab-e90a-4712-86b4-d6ce4da8cdaf
          © 2018 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology
          History
          : 10 December 2017
          : 01 March 2018
          : 06 February 2018
          : 16 March 2018
          Categories
          Full Paper
          bjr, BJR
          h-n, Head and neck
          rt-onc, Radiotherapy and Oncology

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content146

          Cited by2