51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions: Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion From SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Percutaneous revascularization is the primary strategy for treating lower extremity venous and arterial disease. Angiography is limited by its ability to accurately size vessels, precisely determine the degree of stenosis and length of lesions, characterize lesion morphology, or correctly diagnose postintervention complications. These limitations are overcome with use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). IVUS has demonstrated the ability to improve outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, and there is increasing evidence to support its benefits in the setting of peripheral vascular intervention. At this stage in its evolution, there remains a need to standardize the use and approach to peripheral vascular IVUS imaging. This manuscript represents considerations and consensus perspectives that emerged from a roundtable discussion including 15 physicians with expertise in interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, and vascular surgery, representing 6 cardiovascular specialty societies, held on February 3, 2023. The roundtable’s aims were to assess the current state of lower extremity revascularization, identify knowledge gaps and need for evidence, and determine how IVUS can improve care and outcomes for patients with peripheral arterial and deep venous pathology.

          Central Illustration

          Highlights

          • Increasing evidence supports intravascular ultrasound in peripheral arterial and deep venous intervention.

          • Interdisciplinary experts reviewed how intravascular ultrasound can improve patient care and outcomes.

          • The expert panel identified specific data gaps and key training needs for intravascular ultrasound users.

          • Treatment standards, formal training programs, and global quality metrics remain needed.

          • Experts called for intersocietal collaboration on education, awareness, and advocacy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references99

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS)

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions

            This Consensus Document is the first of two reports summarizing the views of an expert panel organized by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) on the clinical use of intracoronary imaging including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The first document appraises the role of intracoronary imaging to guide percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in clinical practice. Current evidence regarding the impact of intracoronary imaging guidance on cardiovascular outcomes is summarized, and patients or lesions most likely to derive clinical benefit from an imaging-guided intervention are identified. The relevance of the use of IVUS or OCT prior to PCI for optimizing stent sizing (stent length and diameter) and planning the procedural strategy is discussed. Regarding post-implantation imaging, the consensus group recommends key parameters that characterize an optimal PCI result and provides cut-offs to guide corrective measures and optimize the stenting result. Moreover, routine performance of intracoronary imaging in patients with stent failure (restenosis or stent thrombosis) is recommended. Finally, strengths and limitations of IVUS and OCT for guiding PCI and assessing stent failures and areas that warrant further research are critically discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Surgery or Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv
                J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv
                Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
                Elsevier
                2772-9303
                09 January 2024
                January 2024
                09 January 2024
                : 3
                : 1
                : 101205
                Affiliations
                [a ]Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
                [b ]Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [c ]Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
                [d ]Heart & Vascular Services, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan
                [e ]Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Wellesley, Massachusetts
                [f ]Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
                [g ]Department of Vascular Surgery, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
                [h ]Center for Interventional Cardiovascular Care, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
                [i ]Weill Cornell Vein Treatment Center and Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
                [j ]Division of Interventional Cardiology and Endovascular Medicine, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
                [k ]Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
                [l ]Venous and Lymphatic Center, Division of Vascular Surgery, Sanger Heart and Vascular, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
                [m ]Advanced Vascular Centers, Portland, Oregon
                [n ]Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Arizona and Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona
                [o ]Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio
                [p ]Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
                [q ]Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author esecemsk@ 123456bidmc.harvard.edu
                Article
                S2772-9303(23)01207-3 101205
                10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101205
                11307416
                38206255
                15980135-6a12-4f3a-b3ad-523581130064
                © 2024 Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Foundation, Society for Vascular Surgery and Society of Interventional Radiology

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 1 June 2023
                : 21 September 2023
                : 3 October 2023
                Categories
                Standards and Guidelines

                expert opinion,intravascular imaging,peripheral vascular disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                5
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                5
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content91

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors1,249