7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      scite_
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Smart Citations
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
      View Citations

      See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

      scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using point of care ultrasound in diagnosing pneumoperitoneum: a case report in a pediatric patient

      Published
      case-report
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Background:

            Gastrointestinal perforation with subsequent pneumoperitoneum is a life-threatening surgical emergency, has a high risk of morbidity and mortality, and requires prompt diagnosis and treatment.

            Case Presentation:

            A 4-year-old boy known case of lymphocele, tethered spinal cord syndrome, neurogenic bladder, and vesicoureteral reflux grade 3 was brought to the emergency department with a history of on and off periumbilical abdominal pain for 15 days, centralized in position, without radiation to other sites of the abdomen, the pain became progressively severe in nature and intensity in the last 3 days. Point of care ultrasound was performed while waiting for the abdomen X-ray. The right upper quadrant of the abdomen was assessed using the curvilinear probe in the longitudinal view, which showed sonographic evidence of pneumoperitoneum, and enhanced peritoneal stripe signs associated with posterior reverberation artifacts.

            Conclusion:

            Understanding the fundamentals of abdominal ultrasound examination will give emergency physicians another diagnostic tool to identify life-threatening cases of acute pneumoperitoneum promptly.

            Main article text

            Background

            Gastrointestinal perforation with resultant pneumoperitoneum is a life-threatening surgical emergency associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate that necessitates immediate diagnosis and intervention [1,2]. Rapid identification of pneumoperitoneum is critically important and can be lifesaving. Upright chest radiographs or abdominal computed tomography are common methods to detect intraperitoneal free air. However, obtaining these examinations at an appropriate time in the emergency room can occasionally be challenging. Ultrasound is an imaging tool that can be performed at the bedside to diagnose acute abdomen issues quickly. It is more widely available in the emergency department (ED) and can rapidly recognize intraperitoneal free air [3,4]. There is limited data to support the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in diagnosing pneumoperitoneum in the ED [3-5]. In this case report, we emphasize the role of POCUS for early identification of gastrointestinal perforation.

            Case Presentation

            A 4-year-old boy, with a known case of lymphocele and tethered spinal cord syndrome that was diagnosed at birth; and neurogenic bladder and grade 3 vesicoureteral reflux, diagnosed at the age of 3 years. Now the patient was brought to the ED with a history of on-and-off periumbilical abdominal pain, for 15 days, centralized in position, without radiation to other sites of the abdomen, the pain became progressively severe in nature and intensity in the last 3 days; however, the patient could not determine its character. The pain was aggravated by food intake and not relieved by any other factors. It was associated with decreased oral intake, one episode of non-projectile, non-bilious vomiting 2 days back, and one documented fever reaching 39°C the day of presentation to the ED. The parents denied a history of diarrhea, urinary complaints, trauma, or foreign body ingestion. Upon arrival at the ED, he was febrile (39°C), heart rate of 124 beats/minute, respiration rate of 42 breath/minute, SPO2 of 96% with a blood pressure of 104/64 mmHg. His blood glucose was 2.8 mg/dl at presentation. On physical examination, he was irritable and crying from pain. The abdomen was distended and diffusely tender with positive rebound tenderness. A peripheral intravenous line was inserted. Laboratory investigations, IV dextrose bolus, intravenous maintenance fluid, and acetaminophen were ordered.

            Figure 1.

            POCUS reveals the presence of free intraperitoneal air, evidenced by the EPSS (blue arrow) and reverberation artifact (red arrow).

            POCUS was performed while waiting for the abdomen X-ray. The right upper quadrant of the abdomen was assessed using the curvilinear probe in the longitudinal view, which showed sonographic evidence of pneumoperitoneum, and enhanced peritoneal stripe signs (EPSSs) associated with posterior reverberation artifacts (Figure 1).

            Abdomen supine and upright X-rays were then performed and showed dilated bowel loops with multiple metallic foreign bodies projecting over the right lower quadrant (most likely magnet) with free air under the diaphragm (Figure 2). Laboratory investigations were remarkable for leukocytosis: White blood cell count of neutrophils count of 11.60, C-reactive protein of 234, and procalcitonin of 2.02.

            The patient was started on broad-spectrum antibiotics, and the pediatric surgery team was consulted urgently. He was immediately taken to the operating room for emergent exploratory laparotomy. The post-operative report showed the presence of thirteen magnets (Figure 3) in the ascending colon and two perforations, one at the cecum and one at the terminal ileum, for which magnets removal with primary closure of ileal and cecal perforation was performed.

            Discussion

            Ultrasound technique

            A focused abdominal ultrasound is performed utilizing a curvilinear abdominal transducer. The patient was positioned supine on the examination table with adequate exposure of the abdomen. This position allows for an initial assessment of the abdominal cavity for signs of free intraperitoneal air. A liberal amount of ultrasound gel was applied, and the examination began with the placement of the transducer in the midline and the right upper quadrant of the abdomen. Following this, the scan is repeated in the left lateral decubitus position. This change in position aids in the detection of subtle signs of pneumoperitoneum by allowing intraperitoneal air to accumulate along dependent areas, enhancing visualization. Dynamic maneuvers, such as altering the patient’s position and instructing deep breathing, were employed to optimize visualization [6-8].

            Figure 2.

            X-ray displaying the presence of free air under the diaphragm, as indicated by the arrow.

            Figure 3.

            Illustrates the presence of 13 magnets located in the ascending colon.

            Systematic scanning for the abdomen was conducted, encompassing all four quadrants of the abdomen. Both longitudinal and transverse views were obtained to evaluate intra-abdominal structures comprehensively.

            The pneumoperitoneum presents sonographically with characteristic signs such as the EPSS. Intraperitoneal air thickens the peritoneum, leading to increased echogenicity of the peritoneal stripe. EPSS can be visualized alone or in conjunction with posterior reverberation artifacts, further aiding in the identification of pneumoperitoneum [8].

            Gastrointestinal perforation is a surgical emergency that requires prompt diagnosis and surgical intervention. Many factors can cause perforation, including blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma, peptic ulcer disease, foreign body ingestion, and inflammatory conditions such as appendicitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and necrotizing enterocolitis [1,2]. Gastrointestinal perforation can result in pneumoperitoneum, which is defined as a collection of air under the diaphragm that can be detected by plain radiography when the patient is either upright or in a lateral decubitus position. However, the traditional use of plain radiography and computed tomography to detect pneumoperitoneum is occasionally challenging in the setting of an ED for many reasons, including overcrowded ED, patient’s ability to stand for erect chest X-rays, and lack of an adequate number of ED staff needed for transporting the patient to the imaging department. Therefore, POCUS would be a more easily accessible and excellent alternative bedside diagnostic tool [6]. There is one study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy between POCUS and plain radiography in 132 patients with suspected perforated viscus demonstrated a sensitivity of 93% vs. 79%, specificity of 64% vs. 64%, accuracy of 90% vs. 77%, positive predictive value of 97% vs. 96%, and negative predictive value of 44% vs.21% [7].

            The diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum using ultrasound is made by placing the curvilinear probe over the midline and right upper quadrant of the abdomen. At the same time, a patient is in the supine position. Subsequently, the scan should be repeated in the left lateral decubitus position, looking for signs of pneumoperitoneum. Intraperitoneal air thickens the peritoneum, resulting in EPSS, which can be identified alone or with posterior reverberation artifacts [8].

            With this case report, we emphasize the importance of POCUS as an excellent and rapid diagnostic method to evaluate patients with acute abdomen. Therefore, we recommend using it in the ED to differentiate the life-threatening pneumoperitoneum while preventing unnecessary radiation exposure.

            Conclusion

            Acute abdominal pain is a common diagnostic dilemma that may not always present with clear signs, especially in the pediatric age group. Knowing the basics of utilizing the abdominal ultrasound examination will offer emergency physicians an additional diagnostic modality to recognize life-threatening cases of acute pneumoperitoneum promptly.

            What is new?

            Gastrointestinal perforation with subsequent pneumoperitoneum is a life-threatening surgical emergency, has a high risk of morbidity and mortality, and requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. The authors present a case of abdominal pain with pneumoperitoneum to emphasize the role of POCUS for early identification of gastrointestinal perforation. The authors believe that their study makes a significant contribution to the literature because understanding the fundamentals of abdominal ultrasound examination will give emergency physicians another diagnostic tool to identify life-threatening cases of acute pneumoperitoneum quickly.

            List of Abbreviations

            ED

            Emergency department

            EPSSs

            Enhanced peritoneal stripe signs

            IV

            Intravenous

            POCUS

            Point-of-care ultrasound

            Conflicts of interest

            The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this case report.

            Funding

            None.

            Consent for publication

            Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

            Ethical approval

            Ethical approval is not required at our institution to publish an anonymous case report.

            References

            1. Emanuel B, Zlotnik P, Raffensperger JG.. Perforation of the gastrointestinal tract in infancy and childhood. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978. Jun;Vol. 146(6):926–8

            2. Grosfeld JL, Molinari F, Chaet M, Engum SA, West KW, Rescorla FJ, et al.. Gastrointestinal perforation and peritonitis in infants and children: experience with 179 cases over ten years. Surgery. 1996. Oct;Vol. 120(4):650–5.

            3. Hoffmann B, Nürnberg D, Westergaard MC.. Focus on abnormal air: diagnostic ultrasonography for the acute abdomen. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012. Oct;Vol. 19(5):284–91.

            4. Coppolino F, Gatta G, Di Grezia G, Reginelli A, Iacobellis F, Vallone G, et al.. Gastrointestinal perforation: ultrasonographic diagnosis. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013. Jul;Vol. 5(Suppl 1):S4

            5. Bacci M, Kushwaha R, Cabrera G, Kalivoda EJ.. Point-of-care ultrasound diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in the Emergency Department. Cureus. 2020. Jun;Vol. 12(6):e8503

            6. Yum J, Hoffman T, Naraghi L.. Timely diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum by point-of-care ultrasound in the Emergency Department: a case series. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2021. Nov;Vol. 5(4):377–80.

            7. Chen SC, Wang HP, Chen WJ, Lin FY, Hsu CY, Chang KJ, et al.. Selective use of ultrasonography for the detection of pneumoperitoneum. Acad Emerg Med. 2002. Jun;Vol. 9(6):643–5.

            8. Hefny AF, Abu-Zidan FM.. Sonographic diagnosis of intraperitoneal free air. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011. Oct;Vol. 4(4):511–3.

            Summary of the case

            1 Patient (gender, age) 4 years old boy
            2 Final diagnosis Pneumoperitoneum
            3 Symptoms Periumbilical abdominal pain
            4 Medications Antibiotics
            5 Clinical procedure Emergency exploratory laparotomy
            6 Specialty Radiology

            Author and article information

            Journal
            European Journal of Medical Case Reports
            EJMCR
            Discover STM Publishing Ltd.
            2520-4998
            30 September 2024
            : 8
            : 9
            : 209-212
            Affiliations
            [1 ]Pediatric Emergency Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
            [2 ]College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
            Author notes
            [* ] Correspondence Author: Bsaim Altirkistani College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. bsaim.altirkistani064@ 123456gmail.com
            Article
            ejmcr-8-209
            10.24911/ejmcr.173-1724966675
            88f5e6fd-516e-47de-a28b-2763281a7711
            © Maram Althagafi, Najeeb Alqarni, Bsaim Altirkistani

            This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, as long as the authors and the original source are properly cited.

            History
            : 29 August 2024
            : 12 September 2024
            Categories
            CASE REPORT

            and pediatrics,Point of care,ultrasound,diagnosis,pneumoperitoneum

            Comments

            Comment on this article