46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      scite_
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Smart Citations
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
      View Citations

      See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

      scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Laparoscopic management of ovarian parasitic myoma: a case report

      Published
      case-report
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Background:

            Ovarian leiomyoma is very rare and constitutes 0.5%-1% of ovarian benign masses. Although most adnexal masses are benign, primary purpose of the assessment is to eliminate any malignancies. The most important issue in the evaluation of ovarian masses is to differentiate between malignant and benign masses. Laparoscopy is an important diagnostic and minimally invasive method for these purposes.

            Case Presentation:

            In this paper, we present a case report on laparoscopic evaluation of a patient who was diagnosed with right ovarian spontaneous parasitic myoma and who did not have a history of uterine surgery.

            Conclusion:

            Uterine ovarian myoma is extremely rare and can be confused with malignant ovarian masses. Laparoscopy option should be considered as the primary approach in the management of masses with suspicious location and appearance and in the differentiation of benign and malignant.

            Main article text

            Background

            Uterine leiomyoma is the most common benign tumor of the female pelvis and uterus [1]. The prevalence of uterine leiomyoma is approximately 25% of reproductive-age women [1]. Post mortem autopsy studies show a prevalence of 50% [1]. Symptomatic patients usually require surgical treatment and uterine leiomyoma is the most common cause of hysterectomy [2].

            In some cases, uterine stem fibroids may bind to neighboring organisms, peritoneum or omentum, losing primary focusing blood, and gaining a secondary circulation source. These fibroids are called parasitic fibroids. Sometimes the treatment of parasitic myomas may prove very difficult due to reasons like vascular, intestinal, and mesenteric invasion [3]. In this paper, we aimed to present a case report related to the laparoscopic approach we performed on a patient diagnosed with right ovarian spontaneous parasitic myoma and who had no prior uterine surgery history.

            Case Presentation

            A 30-year-old female patient with gravida 3, para 1 (normal spontaneous vaginal delivery), abortion 2 was admitted to our outpatient clinic with inguinal pain for 3 months. In her gynecological examination, there was right adnexal sensitivity and distension; however, uterus and both ovaries were observed as normal in her transvaginal ultrasonography. Serum tumor markers CA-125 (14.4 U/ml) and HE4 (8.1 pmol/l) were within the normal reference range and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was negative. A lower abdominal wall magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination was performed due to the observation of a suspected area with regular boundaries at the anterior adjacency of the uterus. On MRI examination, both ovaries were normal and after intravenous contrast agent administration, there was a homogeneous, contrast-enhancing mass of 66*49*37 mm.

            Laparoscopy was planned. In the laparoscopic observation of the patient, the upper abdominal organs, uterus, and left ovary were in normal appearance. However, right ligamentum ovarii proprium appeared longer than normal (Figure 1). In addition, an approximately 6*6 cm mass with a solid, rigid, and vascular structure, similar to ovarian tissue, attached to the right ovary with a peduncle was observed (Figure 2). The mass was separated from the right ovary with LigaSure™. The released mass was then extracted with colpotomy using an endobag (Figures 3 and 4). Mass was delivered for frozen section and its pathology results were assessed as leiomyoma. The operation was completed after colpotomy repair. The patient was discharged in a healthy condition on postoperative second day. The final pathology result of the extracted mass was reported to be consistent with leiomyoma.

            Figure 1.

            Right ovarian leiomyoma and the extended appearance of ligamentum ovarii proprium.

            Figure 2.

            Right ovarian leiomyoma

            Figure 3.

            Removal of the leiomyoma by posterior colpotomy.

            Figure 4.

            Leiomyoma after excision.

            Discussion

            Uterine leiomyomas are benign monoclonal tumors originating from the smooth muscles of the myometrium. Uterine fibroids are the most common pelvic tumors in women, whereas parasitic fibroids are very rare. There are different theories in the formation of rare fibroids other than uterus. It is thought that parasitic leiomyomas are in fact actually pedunculated subserosal leiomyomas which can be monitored freely in the peritoneum and provide their own blood supply by neovascularization. In fact, disseminated peritoneal leiomyomatosis is thought to be caused by diffuse peritoneal metastasis [4].

            Ovarian leiomyoma is very rare and constitutes 0.5%- 1% of ovarian benign masses [5]. Ovarian leiomyoma is common in nulligravids and is often unilateral. Also, most leiomyomas of the ovary are small, usually less than 3 cm in diameter [6]. Consistent with the literature, our case included a unilateral right ovarian leiomyoma. Most of the patients are asymptomatic or present with mild abdominal pain, as in our case. In contrast, Meigs' syndrome caused by giant ovarian leiomyoma with ascitis, hydrothorax and/or hydronephrosis or slightly elevated levels of tumor marker CA-125 [7].

            In the differential diagnosis of ovarian leiomyomas, fibroma-tekoma and leiomyosarcoma which is a rare tumor in ovary should be considered. Especially, it can be difficult to distinguish leiomyomas from fibromas. The clinical findings of these two are similar. They are both asymptomatic, usually unilateral and appear in the fifth decade. Their macroscopic appearance is similar. Microscopically, blunt nuclei of leiomyoma cells and their presence in peri-nuclear halo may be helpful. Specific histochemical stains such as Van Gieson and especially immunohistochemical Desmin and SMA positivity are very important in differential diagnosis [8]. Leiomyosarcomas, on the other hand, are more easily distinguishable by being rich in cells and containing between 4 and 25 mitosis in 10 large magnification areas [9].

            Although most adnexal masses are benign, primary purpose of the assessment is to eliminate any malignancies. It is not possible to detect malignancy with 100% sensitivity preoperatively and the masses often require surgical evaluation. Laparoscopy is an important diagnostic and minimally invasive method for such purposes [10,11]. Laparoscopy; less blood loss, faster return of intestinal functions, shorter hospital stay, reduced incidence of wound infection, less incisional hernia probability, cosmetic advantages, and one of the perioperative advantages of staging in ovarian cancers is one of can be done in a way. It is also easier to obtain intraperitoneal fluid for cytology laparoscopically. Studies have shown similar recurrence rates as a result of staging by laparoscopic or laparotomy [12,13]. In our case, although the clinical examination of the patients was not consistent with ultrasonography and MRI, primary approach was laparoscopy due to young age of the patient and small size of the mass.

            Conclusion

            Diagnosis and approach can be difficult due to abnormal localization of parasitic fibroids. Sometimes, ultrasonography and MRI may not give clear results about the origin of the mass. In preoperative evaluation, most benign masses are unnecessarily evaluated by laparotomy because of high false-positive results in the diagnosis of malignancy. Therefore, suspected adnexal masses should be evaluated intraoperatively primarily by laparoscopy.

            What is new?

            Laparoscopic approach can be preferred over laparotomy for diagnosis and treatment for its less invasive technique in the assessment of the appearance and localization of the mass.

            List of Abbreviations

            HCG

            Human chorionic gonadotropin

            MRI

            Magnetic resonance imaging

            USG

            Ultrasonography

            Funding

            None.

            Conflict of interests

            The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

            Consent for publication

            Informed consent was obtained from the patient for this case to be published in a medical journal.

            Ethical approval

            Ethical approval is not required at our institution to publish an anonymous case report.

            References

            1. Rock AJ, Jones WH. Te Linde's operative gynecology. (9th). (Philadelphia, PA). Wiliams & Wilkins Lippincott. Nov;2020. https://catalog.lib.uchicago.edu/vufind/Record/4911998/TOC2003;753-98

            2. Pavone D, Clemenza S, Sorbi F, Fambrini M, Petraglia F. Epidemiology and risk factors of uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018. Vol. 46:3–11. [Cross Ref]

            3. Novak ER, Woodruff JD. Myoma and other benign tumors of the uterus. In: Novak ER, Woodruff JD, editors. Novak's gynecologic and obstetric pathology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders. 1979. 260–79

            4. Cohen DT, Oliva E, Hahn PF, Fuller AF Jr, Lee SI. Uterine smooth-muscle tumors with unusual growth patterns: imaging with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007. Vol. 188(1):246–55. [Cross Ref]

            5. Agrawal R, Kumar M, Agrawal L, Agrawal KK. A huge primary ovarian leiomyoma with degenerative changes-an unusual. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013. Vol. 7(6):1152–4. [Cross Ref]

            6. Güney M, Ozsoy M, Oral B, Mungan T, Kapucuoğlu N. Unilateral primary ovarian leiomyoma in adolescent: a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007. Vol. 275(6):507–10. [Cross Ref]

            7. Kurai M, Shiozawa T, Noguchi H, Konishi I. Leiomyoma of the ovary presenting with Meigs' syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005. Vol. 31(3):257–62. [Cross Ref]

            8. Lastarria D, Sachdev RK, Babury RA, Yu HM, Nuovo GJ. Immunohistochemical analysis for desmin in normal and neoplastic ovarian stromal tissue. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1990. Vol. 114(5):502–5

            9. Prayson RA, Hart WR. Primary smooth-muscle tumors of the ovary.A clinicopathologic study of four leiomyomas and two mitotically ac-tive leiomyomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992. Vol. 116:1068–71

            10. Pejovic T, Nezhat F. Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses the opportunities and the risks. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001. Vol. 943:255–68. [Cross Ref]

            11. Chapron C, Dubuisson JB, Capella-Allouc S. Salpingooophorectomy for adnexal masses. Place and results for operative laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997. Vol. 73(1):43–8. [Cross Ref]

            12. Nezhat FR, Pejovic T, Finger TN, Khalil SS. Role of minimally invasive surgery in ovarian cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013. Vol. 20:754–65. [Cross Ref]

            13. Weber S, McCann CK, Boruta DM, Schorge JO, Growdon WB. Laparoscopic surgical staging of early ovarian cancer. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011. Vol. 4(3–4):117–22

            Summary of the case

            1 Patient (gender, age) Female, 30 years old
            2 Final diagnosis Ovarian parasitic myoma
            3 Symptoms Inguinal pain ongoing for 3 months
            4 Medications Surgery
            5 Clinical procedure Laparoscopic myomectomy
            6 Specialty Gynecology and Obstetrics

            Author and article information

            Journal
            European Journal of Medical Case Reports
            EJMCR
            Discover STM Publishing Ltd.
            2520-4998
            28 February 2021
            : 5
            : 2
            : 63-65
            Affiliations
            [1. ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, İzmir Tınaztepe University, Izmir, Turkey
            [2. ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
            Author notes
            [* ] Correspondence to: Burak Bayraktar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Tepecik Training and Research Hospital Izmir, Turkey. drburakbayraktar@ 123456gmail.com
            Author information
            http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1844-1782
            http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8682-5537
            http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6233-4207
            http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2735-6010
            Article
            EJMCR-5-63
            10.24911/ejmcr/173-1606054161
            15ad026b-db0b-45fd-bc11-932f2c059adf
            © Ceren Gölbaş, Hakan Gölbaş, Burak Bayraktar, Alper Biler

            This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, as long as the authors and the original source are properly cited.

            History
            : 22 September 2020
            : 04 February 2021
            Categories
            CASE REPORT

            adnexal mass,leiomyoma,Ovary,laparoscopy

            Comments

            Comment on this article