84
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      scite_
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Smart Citations
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
      View Citations

      See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

      scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinico-radiological evaluation of Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibromas: two case reports

      Published
      case-report
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Background:

            Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) also called as bleeding fibroma as this is highly vascular tumor. This is a benign tumor of prepubertal and young adults which is locally aggressive and has got tendency to bleed. The extension of the tumor takes place because of potential available in nasopharyngeal space.

            Case presentation:

            We present two cases of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas in different stages with highlighting the role of contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CECT).

            Conclusion:

            We emphasize over the clinico-radiological evaluation for making the diagnosis. The correct pre-operative radiological staging is mandatory prerequisite for the surgical management.

            Main article text

            Background

            Angiofibromas are the benign tumors of the blood vessels. The entity was named as angiofibroma first by Friedberg in 1940.This accounts for 0.5% of all the head and neck tumors and incidence is 1 among 150,000 individuals [1]. JNA was exclusively found in males in the second decade. This may not cause any symptoms for 6-12 months before the diagnosis is made. Extra nasalangiofibromas occur in elderly females and are comparatively less aggressive [2].

            Case presentation

            Case 1:

            A 14 year old boy reported with complaint of slight swelling in right maxillary and orbital region of four months duration. There was no history of trauma or fever. There were complaints of right nostril obstruction and mild headache but no bleeding from the nose. On examination, the boy was of average built with slight prominence of the right malar region. The overlying skin was of normal coloration. Anterior rhinoscopy showed blockage of the right nostril by pinkish lobulated mass not adherent to the opposing surface. Posterior rhinoscopy revealed the mass occupying the right nostril with extension to the posterior nasopharyngeal space. Other systemic examination was unremarkable. Biochemical parameters were within normal limits. Plain X-ray of the neck with face had shown the soft tissue density opacity in the nasopharyngeal region (Figure 1).

            The boy was subjected to plain and contrast computerized tomography after proper written consent. There was enhancing mass in the right nostril region extending postero laterally to the nasopharyngeal space. There was no destruction of bone but remodeling was noticed (Figure 2a,b,c, 3a,b and 4a,b).

            The patient was finally diagnosed with that of nasopharyngeal angiofibroma stage IIb as per the NCCT and CECT findings with the background of clinical setting. Now the patient had been kept under observation and surgical intervention will be decided soon as the patient is not much symptomatic.

            Figure 1:

            Plain X-ray lateral view of face and neck region.There is soft tissue density opacity in the nasopharynx (red star).Superior margins of the mass are retained by sphenoid sinus and basiocciput (white inverted arrow).

            Figure 2:

            Non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT) of the facial region axial sections. (a) there is an expansion of right nostril passage (blue arrow) and pterygomaxillary fossa(blue star) displacing the nasal septum to contralateral side. (b) inferior extension of the mass in nasopharyngeal space (blue star). (c) the bone window shows expansion of right nasal passage (red star) and pterygomaxillary fossa (green star) without bony destruction.

            Figure 3:

            CECT facial region (a) axial section shows intense enhancement of the mass in the right nostril (red star) and in pterygomaxillary fossa (blue arrow).Right orbit shows slight prominence because of the mass expansion (white arrow). (b) sagittal reformatted image shows the superior extent of the mass (blue arrow) along with inferior extent (red star). (c) coronal reformat image shows enhancement of the mass extending from the medial aspect in the right nostril (red star) laterally to the pterygomaxillary fossa (white arrow) without involving infratemporal fossa (black arrow).

            Figure 4:

            CECT contd. (a) magnified axial section shows the enhancing mass attempting to go into orbital fissure (red arrow). (b) SSD image shows normal bony outline without any destruction.

            Case 2:

            A 14 year old boy reported with the complaint of frequent episodes of epistaxis of one year duration. He also had complaint of headache of the same duration. There was slight protrusion of right malar prominence. He also had a history of recurrent episodes of sinusitis and right side nasal obstruction. On anteriorrhinoscopy there was a dull pinkish mass in the right nostril on the posterior aspect. Posteriorrhinoscopy had revealed the same mass going superiorly and inferiorly but was of more pinkish in coloration. Rest of the systemic examination was unremarkable. Blood investigations were normal except Hbas 9.5 g/dl. Plain lateral skiagram of the face showed the soft tissue density opacity in the nasopharyngeal space (Figure 5).

            He underwent NCCT and CECT of the face for the nasopharynx and sinuses. There was intense enhancing mass in the right nostril extending to the pterygomaxillary and infratemporal fossa (Figures 6 a,b,c, 7a,b,c, 8a,b,c and 9).

            The patient was diagnosed as that of nasopharyngeal angiofibroma stage II-c with the strong clinical setting. He had been planned for endoscopic surgical resection.

            Figure 5:

            Plain X-ray of the head and neck region for nasopharynx. There is soft tissue density opacity in the nasopharynx (red arrow) with intact sphenoid sinus and bone (white arrow) and obstructing the nasal passage anteriorly (green arrow).

            Figure 6:

            NCCT facial region axial sections. (a) soft tissue mass in the right nostril (blue arrow) and similar density in the right pterygomaxillary fossa (blue star). (b) section at slightly lower level shows the inferior extension of the mass (blue star). (c) The bone window does not reveal any bony destruction in the nasal passage (red star) and in the pterygomaxillary fossa (green star).

            Figure 7:

            NCCT bone window. (a) axialsection shows the mass (red star) causing expansion without damaging the nasal septum (white horizontal arrow) and the posterior wall of the right maxillary sinus (white inverted arrow). (b) higher axial section shows partially opacified ethmoid air cells without destruction (white arrow) and with intact middle cranial fossa boundary (green arrow). (c) coronal reformat image shows the bony boundaries of the nasal mass (red star) with lateral extension (white arrow) with normal left maxillary sinus (green star).

            Figure 8:

            CECT of nasopharynx show avid enhancing mass lesion. (a) axial ion shows the enhancing mass on the posterior aspect of the nostril (blue arrow) with partly non-obstructive anterior passage (arrow head). (b) sagittal reformat image shows the extent of enhancing mass from the basiocciput to the inferior margin (blue arrow). (c) coronal reformat image shows the same mass extending laterally towards the pterygomaxillary and infra-temporal fossa compromising the right maxillary sinus (blue arrow).

            Figure 9:

            CECT contd. magnified coronal section of the nasopharynx shows the nasal mass (red star) with lateral extension to the pterygomaxillary and infratemporal fossa (green arrow) with an intact nasal septum and nasal passage (blue arrow).

            Figure 10:

            Diagrammatic representation of nasopharynx anatomy in sagittal section. The nasopharynx is outlined anteriorly by choana and nasal septum and posterolaterally by sphenoid and basiocciput (white arrow). Buccal cavity has been shown as antero-inferior to the nasopharynx (white star).

            Discussion

            JNA originates from the superior margin of spheno-palatine fossa and posterior part of the middle turbinate. The knowledge of the basic anatomy of the nasopharynx is very important to know the origin as well as expansion and extension of the tumor to various directions (Figure 10).

            Though the exact etiology of JNA is uncertain but hormonal factors play a role in these tumors. Marten et al proposed this hormonal theory first time. This was because of decrease in androgen levels and increased activity of estrogen components. The nasal mucosa is having more hormonal receptors at the regions mentioned above with additional vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) responsible for the outcome [3]. Another theory of desmoplastic response of nasopharyngeal periosteum has also been suggested. Another version of nonchromafin paraganglionic cells of terminal branches of maxillary artery has been suggested. Girgis and Fahmy observed “Zell ballen” cell nests at the growing edge of the tumor making it similar to paraganglionoma. But the most accepted theory has been from the origin of sex steroid stimulus hamartomatous tissue. The tumor originates from the sphenopalatine foramen and extends to nasopharynx and pterygopalatine fossa. These are also called as bilobed tumors because of the pattern of their extension. It can extend superiorly to the sphenoid sinus and can invade the cavernous sinus. Around 10-20% of the tumor shows intracranial extension. Following are presenting features of the patients:

            -Nasal obstruction (80-90%)
            -Epistaxis (50-60%)
            -Headache (25%)
            -Facial swelling (10-18%)

            Nasal (80%) and orbital masses (15%) with proptosis (10-15%) are frequently encountered. Nasal obstruction frequently leads to the accumulation of the secretions leading to sepsis responsible for hyposmia or anosmia. Other associated features may develop depending upon the regional involvement like deafness, headache, diplopia and otalgia. These masses required to be differentiated from other pathologies causing nasal obstruction like polyps, teratoma, dermoid and encephalocele. Other factors responsible for epistaxis have to be ruled out. Sessions et al has categorized the tumor into the following three stages as per the sub mucosal extension [4,5]:

            Stage I:

            1-a: limited to the nasopharynx.

            1-b: when there is an extension to one or more paranasal sinuses.

            Stage II:

            II-a: minimal extension to pterygomaxillary fossa through sphenopalatine foramina.

            II-b: bowing of posterior wall of maxillary antrum (Holman-Miller sign) or extension to the orbit through inferior orbital fissure.

            II-c: extension into infratemporal fossa (modified by Radomski)

            Stage III: calabash like tumor

            III-a: with minimal Intracranial extension.

            III-b: extensive intracranial extension with or without cavernous sinus invasion.

            Plain X-ray reveals the opacity because of the soft tissue mass. Computerized tomography (CT) is the best imaging modality to know the involvement of the bone with the extension of the tumor mass. The mass is well defined, non-encapsulated and lobulated with epicenter around sphenopalatine foramina. There is intense enhancement seen because of the high vascular contents [6,7]. There is resorption or remodeling of the bone rather than the destruction which makes it different from aggressive and malignant pathologies. The characteristic appearance of JNA may not warrant any biopsy confirmation which itself is not safe. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is also helpful in tissue characterization and evaluation of the extent of the tumor. Pathologically, these are nodular masses which are white in color but the mucosal covered region is pink in coloration. Though there is no capsule but these are well demarcated from the surrounding tissue. This also suggests for first separating the mass and then to be removed surgically to avoid bleeding during surgery. Microscopically, these tumors are composed of fibrocellular stroma with spindle-shaped cells in interspersed collagen with irregular vascular pattern. Vascular component is more near the origin and has got two types of vessels, one without the muscular coat and other with thick muscular media. The vessels without muscular coats are responsible for bleeding as these fail to constrict. It is covered with squamous epithelium with underneath mucous glands along with infiltrates. Fibrous element increases with the age [8]. Treatment involves surgery, irradiation or hormonal therapy depending upon the staging and involvement. Spontaneous regression [9, 10] has been noticed in individuals who are > 20 years old. Surgical management [11, 12] is the primary treatment which is required in most of the cases. There is 46% recurrence rate after surgical excision. Angiography is helpful to find the feeder vessel and to embolize it 24-72 hours before surgery to minimize the bleeding [13]. Radiotherapy (30-46 Gy) is indicated in non-operable and recurring cases. This induces radiation vasculitis leading to many side effects. Small doses are ineffective and the large dose can cause damage to the healthy tissues. This also makes the surgery difficult if required later on [14]. Adjunctive hormonal therapy has been tried which block the testosterone receptors [15]. The tumor course may have to be watched with repeat imaging study in case there are signs of regression. The incidence of recurrence is high where there is antero-posterior extension.

            Conclusion

            JNA are the locally aggressive tumors which require complete work up before the decision of the management strategy. This can lead to great morbidity and mortality because of their aggressive nature and tendency to bleed. The correct staging is of paramount importance as there is great danger of the bleeding and residual tumors. CECT plays important role in staging. Pre-operative angiography is always helpful to minimize the bleeding during surgery.

            Acknowledgements

            We are thankful to Mrs. Shilpa, Mr. Nitish, Mr. Rajdeep and Miss Nitika of Faculty of Allied Health Sciences of SGT University Gurgaon, for acquiring the images and helping in carrying out the investigation.

            List of Abbreviations

            CECT

            contrast enhanced computed tomography

            MRI

            Magnetic resonance imaging

            NCCT

            Non-contrast computerized tomography

            VEGF

            Vascular endothelial growth factors

            Conflict of Interests

            None

            Funding

            None

            Consent for publication

            Informed consentwas obtained from both patients to publish this case.

            Ethical approval

            Not applicable.

            Authors’ contribution

            BBS conceived the idea and wrote the first draft of the case report, SS provided all the details of clinical examination and details of laryngoscopy. SS provided details of the systemic examination and helped in writing the case. NB procured the images of MRI, SD helped in reviewing the case. MRA helped in radiography and MRI investigation. All authors revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.

            References

            1. Coutinho-Camillo CM, Brentani MM, Nagai MA.. Genetic alterations in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas. Head Neck. 2008. Vol. 30:390–400. [10.1002/hed.20775]

            2. Momeni AK, Roberts CC, Chew FS.. Imaging of chronic and exotic sinonasal disease: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007. Vol. 189:S35–45. [10.2214/AJR.07.7031]

            3. Liu Z, Wang J, Wang H, Wang D, Hu L, Liu Q, et al.. Hormonal receptors and vascular endothelial growth factor in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: immunohistochemical and tissue microarray analysis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2015. Vol. 135:51–7. [10.3109/00016 489.2014.952774]

            4. Sessions RB, Bryan RN, Naclerio RM, Alford BR.. Radiographic staging of juvenile angiofibroma. Head Neck Surg. 1981. Vol. 3:279–83

            5. Bryan RN, Sessions RB, Horowitz BL.. Radiographic management of juvenile angiofibromas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1981. Vol. 2:157–66

            6. Mishra S, Praveena NM, Panigrahi RG, Gupta YM.. Imaging in the diagnosis of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2013. Vol. 3:1[10.4103/2156-7514.109469]

            7. Garca MF, Sevil Ari Yuca, Koksal Yuca.. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Eur J Gen Med. 2010. Vol. 7:419–25

            8. Radkowski D, McGill T, Healy GB, Ohlms L, Jones DT.. Angiofibroma. Changes in staging and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996. Vol. 122:122–9

            9. Stansbie JM, Phelps PD.. Involution of residual juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (a case report). J Laryngol Otol. 1986. Vol. 100:599–603

            10. Tosun F, Onerci M, Durmaz A, Ugurel S.. Spontaneous involution of nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. J Craniofac Surg. 2008. Vol. 19:1686–9. [10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181897222]

            11. Ahmad R, Ishlah W, Azilah N, Rahman JA.. Surgical management of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma without angiographic embolization. Asian J Surg. 2008. Vol. 31:174–8. [10.1016/S1015-9584(08)60081-0]

            12. Danesi G, Panciera DT, Harvey RJ, Agostinis C.. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: evaluation and surgical management of advanced disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008. Vol. 138:581–6. [10.1016/j.otohns.2008.01.011]

            13. Li JR, Qian J, Shan XZ, Wang L.. Evaluation of the effectiveness of preoperative embolization in surgery for nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1998. Vol. 255:430–2

            14. Lee JT, Chen P, Safa A, Juillard G, Calcaterra TC.. The role of radiation in the treatment of advanced juvenile angiofibroma. Laryngoscope. 2002. Vol. 112:1213–20. [10.1097/00005537-200207000-00014]

            15. Enepekides DJ.. Recent advances in the treatment of juvenile angiofibroma. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004. Vol. 12:495–9

            Summary of the case

            Patient (gender, age) 114 year old, males
            Final Diagnosis 2Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma
            Symptoms 3Malar prominence, epistaxis,nasal obstruction and headache
            Medications (Generic) 4Analgesic and anti-allergic
            Clinical Procedure 5Plain X-ray PNS and CECT paranasal sinuses
            Specialty 6Radio-diagnosis. Otolaryngology
            Objective 7To show the types and staging of the extension of pathology
            Background 8Tumor initially not showing any symptoms but presenting delayed complaints.
            Case Report 9Clinico-radiological evaluation of Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibromas: two case reports
            Conclusions 10Young children presenting with nasal obstruction, epistaxis and headache should be evaluated with CECT paranasal sinuses to diagnose and grade the juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma.
            MeSH Keywords 11juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma, vascular tumor, aggressive, CECT, staging, case report

            Author and article information

            Journal
            European Journal of Medical Case Reports
            EJMCR
            Discover STM Publishing Ltd.
            2520-4998
            30 May 2017
            : 1
            : 2
            : 79-85
            Affiliations
            [1 ]Department of Radio-diagnosis, SGT Medical College Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
            [2 ]Department of ENT & Head and Neck Surgery, SGT Medical College, Budhera (Gurgaon), India.
            [3 ]Department of Pediatrics, SGT Medical College Budhera (Gurgaon), India.
            Author notes
            [* ] Correspondence to: Bharat Bhushan Sharma, Professor & Head of Department of Radio-diagnosis, SGT Medical College, Gurgaon, India. Email: bbhushan986@ 123456gmail.com
            Article
            ejmcr-1-79
            10.24911/ejmcr/1/20
            11b23bb1-a196-4716-b6e0-e92b2aef4cf1
            © Bharat Bhushan Sharma, Shweta Sharma, Shashi Sharma, Naveen Bhardwaj, Sakshi Dewan, Mir Rizwan Aziz

            This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, as long as the authors and the original source are properly cited.

            History
            : 01 March 2017
            : 26 March 2017
            Categories
            CASE REPORT

            juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma,case report,staging,CECT,vascular tumor,aggressive

            Comments

            Comment on this article