605
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    2
    shares

      Interested in becoming a RADSCI published author?

      • Platinum Open Access with no APCs.
      • Fast peer review/Fast publication online after article acceptance.

      See further information on submitting a paper at https://radsci-journal.org/submit-a-paper/

      scite_
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Smart Citations
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
      View Citations

      See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

      scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Magnetic resonance imaging-based progress in human glymphatic system research

      Published
      original-research
      a , b , c , * ,
      Radiology Science
      Compuscript
      human glymphatic system, MRI
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            The recently discovered glymphatic system is considered a prominent breakthrough in neuroscience. The glymphatic system serves as a cerebrospinal fluid-interstitial fluid exchange system involving polarization of the water channel protein, aquaporin-4, in astrocyte endfeet. In this review we summarize the MRI findings that have contributed to the research advances of the human glymphatic system and propose prospective future applications.

            Main article text

            1. CONCEPT AND FUNCTION OF THE GLYMPHATIC SYSTEM

            Iliff et al. [1] first described a rapid exchange system involving cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF) in 2012, which serves as one of the mechanisms by which metabolites and waste are removed from the brain. Because of the functional similarity to the peripheral lymphatic system and the functional dependence on gliocytes, it is designated as the glymphatic system or glymphatics. A schematic of glymphatics is depicted in Figure 1 . [1, 2]

            Figure 1 |

            Schematic drawing of glymphatics.

            CSF enters the brain parenchyma from the subarachnoid space (SAS) along para-arterial spaces (glymphatic influx) to drive the bulk flow of ISF toward the para-venous spaces, from which solutes and fluid will flow into the SAS or drain out of the brain tissue toward the cervical lymphatic tissue (glymphatic outflow). In addition to moving through the astrocytic clefts, the CSF-ISF exchange around the para-vascular spaces is facilitated by aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channels, which are highly expressed in the astrocytic endfeet. Glymphatic efflux primarily functions to facilitate the removal of metabolites and waste solutes, such as lactate and soluble amyloid beta in the ISF, thus having a role in draining waste from the brain. In contrast, due to its critical role in the delivery of CSF solutes into the brain parenchyma, glymphatic influx may serve as a brain-wide distribution system for choroid plexus/CSF-derived nutrients and neuroactive substances. Recent studies have demonstrated that the glymphatic system also contributes to the transport of neural active substances and nutrients (such as glucose, lipids, and apolipoprotein E) from the CSF to the brain, in addition to the removal of intracerebral metabolites (such as lactic acid), soluble proteins (such as amyloid beta and tau), and foreign materials [1, 38].

            Therefore, glymphatics can be divided into two parts (glymphatic influx and efflux). The glymphatic system clears metabolic wastes from the brain, and transports and distributes neural active substances and nutrients from the CSF to the ISF [18].

            Glymphatic system activity is significantly higher during sleep compared to the awake state, illustrating that sleep serves as a considerable condition for removing metabolic wastes from the brain [9]. Moreover, the glymphatic system will sustain damage in line with aging [10], which may also be a common factor in the pathophysiology of several neurodegenerative diseases. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the glymphatic system is attenuated in conditions, such as small vessel disease [11, 12], Alzheimer’s disease [1315], traumatic brain injury [4, 8, 1620], stroke [2123], diabetes [24], migraine [25], and others that are associated with changes in the perivascular space, and abnormal expression and distribution of AQP4.

            2. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN HUMAN GLYMPHATIC SYSTEM RESEARCH

            Nearly all of the studies on glymphatics have been conducted using experimental animals, with few studies involving humans. Thus, there are few safe and effective methods to monitor the flow of CSF-ISF exchange in vivo at present; however, popularization of MRI will help fill our gaps in knowledge.

            At present, only macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are used as a tracer in glymphatics in vivo. Long-term persistence of GBCAs in brain tissue has been demonstrated for less stable and linear GBCAs, but not for macrocyclic GBCAs [26, 27]. Macrocyclic GBCAs are generally administered intravenously at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg [28]. In the first 90 min after intravenous administration of macrocyclic GBCAs, the plasma concentrations are followed by three phases: distribution; rapid elimination; and long-lasting residual elimination from a third compartment [29]. In the last phase, tiny amounts of macrocyclic GBCAs cross the blood-brain barrier into the CSF and glymphatics. Macrocyclic GBCAs undergo a slow, gradual process, then peak 4-24 h after intravenous administration, thus serving as a tracer of glymphatics in vivo [30].

            2.1 Intrathecal administration of macrocyclic GBCAs

            In November 2015 Eide et al. [31] first reported a young woman undergoing MRI with an intrathecal injection of gadobutrol, which was distributed throughout the entire brain in 60 min and the glymphatic system in 270 min. Therefore, MRI with an intrathecal administration of macrocyclic GBCAs may become a useful method for glymphatics research of the human brain.

            Subsequently, on February 2018, Eide et al. [32] carried out a study involving 30 patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) and 8 patients with suspected CSF leaks as a reference. Multiple MRI acquisitions with the intrathecal administration of gadobutrol were obtained over a 24-48 h time span in the cognitively-affected iNPH patients and unaffected reference patients. CSF tracer enrichment was confirmed by alterations in normalized MRI T1WI signal units. Compared to the reference patients, the iNPH patients exhibited an increased Evan’s index, medial temporal lobe atrophy score, and inferior entorhinal cortex thickness. The delayed clearance of intrathecal gadobutrol from the CSF, entorhinal cortex, and adjacent white matter suggested dysfunction of the glymphatic system. The reduced clearance and accumulation of metabolites and toxic waste materials may serve as a mechanism underlying dementia in patients with iNPH, and glymphatic MRI may be tool contributing to the early evaluation of dementia.

            On May 2018 Eide et al. [33] highlighted the evidence which showed that the central nervous system had functional lymphatic tissues, and included data on central lymphatic drainage to cervical lymph tissues in humans with enhanced MRI and intrathecal administration of gadobutrol. MRI scans in 19 people were performed before and 2-4, 4-6, 6-9, 24, and 48 h following intrathecal administration of 0.5 ml of 1.0 mmol/ml of gadobutrol. The enhancement was determined according to the signal variations in the inferior frontal gyrus and the adjacent CSF, pons and thalamus, parahippocampal gyrus, and cervical lymph nodes, with the sagittal sinus and neck muscles used as the reference tissues for the cranial and neck MRI acquisitions, respectively. The time course of the lymph tissue contrast enhancement was shown to coincide with the brain glymphatic contrast enhancement that peaked at 24 h rather than CSF enhancement that peaked at 4-6 h.

            The advantages of the human glymphatic MRI intrathecal injection of macrocyclic GBCA technique can be summarized as follows: (1) The technique continuously reflects the clearance performance of the glymphatic system for a long time. (2) The distribution of tracers in the brain is not affected by the blood-brain barrier and blood circulation. The disadvantages of the human glymphatic MRI intrathecal injection of macrocyclic GBCA technique are as follows: (1) The technique is invasive. (2) Multiple imaging studies are required at regular intervals. (3) GBCAs are deposited in the brain.

            2.2 Diffusion-weighted images (DTIs)

            On February 2017 Taoka et al. [34] conducted a study involving 31 patients, 9 of whom had mild cognitive impairment, 16 had Alzheimer’s disease, and 6 had subjective cognitive dysfunction (mini-mental state examination [MMSE] score ranging from 12-30). DTI scanning was performed for calculating diffusivities in the x, y, and z axes of the lateral ventricle body plane. The diffusivity along perivascular spaces, as well as the association and projection fibers, were assessed separately to obtain the analysis along the perivascular space (ALPS) index that was correlated with the MMSE score. The ALPS index is calculated as follows: mean (Dxassoc, Dxproj)/mean (Dzassoc, Dyproj). Taoka et al. [34] reported that in the projection areas of the b = 1000 s/mm2 datasets the MMSE score and x-axis diffusivity along the perivascular spaces exhibited a positive and statistically significant correlation, and a statistically significantly negative correlation between the MMSE score and z-axis diffusivity along the projection fibers, while no significant correlation existed with the y-axis diffusivity in the anterior-posterior direction. In the association areas of the b = 1000 s/mm2 datasets, the MMSE score had a positive correlation with x-axis diffusivity along the perivascular spaces and a negative correlation with y-axis diffusivity along the association fibers, while no statistically significant correlation with z-axis diffusivity in the head-to-feet direction. No statistically significant correlation existed between the MMSE score and the diffusivity of the three directions in the subcortical area. When evaluating the ALPS index, a positive correlation was detected between the MMSE score and the ALPS index in the b = 1000 s/mm2 datasets. The lower diffusivity along perivascular spaces on DTI-APLS represented impairment of the glymphatics, thus assessing glymphatics function.

            The advantages of the human glymphatic MRI DTI technique can be summarized as follows: (1) Contrast medium can be omitted to perform a non-invasive examination. (2) The safety of the technique in human research has been widely confirmed. The downside of the human glymphatic MRI DTI technique is that the technique can only reveal transient glymphatic system function during scanning.

            2.3 Intravenous administration of macrocyclic GBCAs

            On October 2017 Absinta et al. [35] proposed the existence of meningeal lymphatics in humans and common marmosets, accompanied by the feasibility of non-invasively mapping in vivo and imaging with clinical MRI. On T1-weighted black-blood imaging and T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), lymphatic vessels coursing alongside dual venous sinuses were enhanced by gadobutrol, which has a high propensity to extravasate across a permeable capillary endothelial barrier, but not with gadofosveset, a blood-pool contrast medium. Immunohistochemically, meningeal lymphatic vessels exhibit a typical panel of lymphatic endothelial markers in common marmosets.

            On November 2018, Naganawa et al. [36] conducted an evaluation on GBCA leakage from cortical veins of patients with delayed imaging and intravenous GBCA (IV-GBCA). Six patients, 37-58 years of age, with suspected endolymphatic hydrops (EH) were assessed. The patients accepted a single dose of IV-GBCA in the first part of the study. Three-dimensional real inversion recovery images were obtained before administration of the contrast agent, as well as 5 min and 4 h after IV-GBCA. If contrast enhancement around cortical veins was observed 5 min after IV-GBCA with further spread into the CSF 4 h after IV-GBCA, leakage from cortical veins to the CSF was graded as positive. Twenty-one patients, 17-69 years of age, with suspected EH were evaluated in the second part of the study. Only the images 4 h after IV-GBCA were obtained. The slices with positive GBCA leakage from the veins were counted, and the correlation between the number of slices with gender, age, and degree of EH were assessed according to Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. In the first part of the study the GBCA leakage from cortical veins was shown to be positive in all patients. In the second part of the study GBCA leakage was observed in patients > 37 years of age, but not in patients < 37 years. The number of slices significantly correlated only with age, but not the degree of EH or gender.

            On November 2018 Ohashi et al. [37] utilized magnetic resonance cisternography (MRC) and heavily T2-weighted three-dimensional fluid attenuated inversion recovery (hT2W-3D-FLAIR) imaging in 25 patients with suspected EH 4 h after IV administration of a single dose of a GBCA. CSF space segmentation in the ambient cistern, the perivascular space (PVS) in the basal ganglia, the CSF surrounding the vein of Labbe, and the CSF surrounding the superficial middle cerebral vein was carried out on MRC. The former two segments were then co-registered onto the hT2W-3D-FLAIR and the signal intensities were measured. The signal intensity ratio of post-contrast hT2W-3D-FLAIR to pre-contrast hT2W-3D-FLAIR was calculated. Ohashi et al. [37] found a significantly stronger enhancement of the CSF space around the vein of Labbe determined on hT2W-3D-FLAIR 4 h after IV-GBCA compared to the other CSF spaces and the PVS, and concluded that the vein of Labbe might play a role in GBCA leakage into the CSF.

            In April 2019 Deike-Hofmann et al. [38] demonstrated that the glymphatic system could be visualized in vivo by observing the GBCA pathway into and through heavily T2-weighted FLAIR (hT2W-FLAIR) MRI obtained after IV-GBCA. hT2W-FLAIR was acquired in 33 neurologically-normal control subjects and 7 patients with an impaired blood-brain barrier resulting from cerebral metastases before, and 3 and 24 h after IV-GBCA. The signal intensity was determined in various kinds of cerebral fluid spaces. In addition, white matter hyperintensities were quantified using the Fazekas scoring system. The delayed hT2W-FLAIR showed that GBCAs entered the CNS through the ciliary body and choroid plexus with drainage along perivascular spaces of penetrating cortical arteries and perineural sheaths of cranial nerves. Furthermore, a statistically significantly positive correlation was demonstrated by a Fazekas score with signal intensity elevation in the perivascular spaces 3 h after IV-GBCA. The correlation between glymphatic system functioning and deep white matter hyperintensities, an imaging sign of vascular dementia, illustrated the feasibility of exploiting the GBCA pathway through the glymphatic system for diagnostic purposes.

            Sleep is acknowledged to promote glymphatic activity [3, 9, 39, 40]. In September 2021 Lee et al. [41] examined the feasibility of applying multiple intravenous enhanced T1-mapping in the quantitative evaluation of glymphatic clearance in different brain regions, demonstrating the effect of sleep on glymphatic clearance in humans. Lee et al. [41] confirmed greater clearance of contrast agents after sleep, as well as a connection between sleep and glymphatic activity.

            In 2020 Mijnders et al. [42] evaluated the most promising MRI sequence for glymphatic MRI 4-24 h after administration of a GBCA, thus identifying long TE 3D-FLAIR as the most promising MRI sequence for detecting low-dose GBCAs in the glymphatic system.

            An advantage of the human glymphatic MRI IV-GBCA technique is the higher safety compared to an intrathecal injection. The disadvantages of the human glymphatic MRI IV-GBCA technique are as follows: (1) The technique is invasive. (2) Multiple scans are required at regular intervals. (3) The distribution of tracers in the brain will be affected by the blood-brain barrier and the blood circulation.

            3. PROSPECTS OF MRI FOR HUMAN GLYMPHATIC SYSTEM RESEARCH

            3.1 Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)

            On June 2020 Chen et al. [43] reported visualization of the glymphatic system by CEST MRI. The MRI effect was measured in vitro at 7.0 Tesla using lymph, blood, and CSF from a pig. In the in vitro study the CEST effect of the lymph fluid was evident at 1.0 ppm and was distinguishable from CSF and blood. Unilateral deep cervical lymph nodes of 20 adult male rats were ligated, then CEST MRI was used to observe the CEST signal changes in rat brain followed by correlation analysis with behavior. The CEST signal intensity was significantly higher in the ipsilateral than the contralateral hippocampus, with a statistically significant correlation of the behavioral score with the signal abnormality. These results supported the notion that CEST MRI might serve as a tool for evaluation of the glymphatics in vivo and for prediction of glymphatic function impairment.

            The advantages of the glymphatic CEST technique can be listed as follows: (1) Molecular information, such as protein, can be captured. (2) Metabolic function is determined.

            3.2 Arterial spin labelling (ASL)

            On April 2020 Evans et al. [44] proposed a technique for measuring blood-CSF barrier function non-invasively using a tracer-free MRI to quantify rates of water delivery from the arterial blood to the ventricular CSF. Evans et al. [44] reported a 36% decrease in blood-CSF barrier function in old mice compared to a 13% decrease in the parenchymal blood flow; however, this usage was preliminary and the analysis was confined to the CSF near the choroid plexus.

            The advantages of ASL are as follows: (1) ASL is non-invasive. (2) ASL is closely related to AQP4. The disadvantages of ASL are as follows: (1) The calculation process and the establishment of the model are relatively tedious. (2) The evaluation can only be performed to assess glymphatic system inflow function.

            At present, CEST and ASL techniques are only used in glymphatic studies involving mice; studies involving humans have not been conducted. It can be expected that in the near future, however, CEST and ASL technology studies will be conducted on the human glymphatic system.

            The authors are of the opinion that DTI, CEST, ASL, and the intravenous administration or intrathecal administration of macrocyclic GBCAs as MR methods can be used in human glymphatic system research. DTI, CEST, and ASL do not require a contrast agent, which can illustrate transient glymphatic system function during scanning in a safe and non-invasive manner, as well as capture molecular information. The intravenous or intrathecal administration of macrocyclic GBCAs reflect the clearance performance of glymphatic system for a long time.

            CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

            The authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

            REFERENCES

            1. Iliff JJ, Wang M, Liao Y, Plogg BA, Peng W, et al.. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β. Sci Transl Med. 2012. Vol. 4:147ra111. 2289667510.1126/scitranslmed.3003748

            2. Benveniste H, Lee H, Volkow ND. The glymphatic pathway: waste removal from the CNS via cerebrospinal fluid transport. Neuroscientist. 2017. Vol. 23:454–65. 2846675810.1177/1073858417691030

            3. Lundgaard I, Lu ML, Yang E, Peng W, Mestre H, et al.. Glymphatic clearance controls state-dependent changes in brain lactate concentration. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017. Vol. 37:2112–24. 2748193610.1177/0271678X16661202

            4. Iliff JJ, Chen MJ, Plog BA, Zeppenfeld DM, Soltero M, et al.. Impairment of glymphatic pathway function promotes tau pathology after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci. 2014. Vol. 34:16180–93. 2547156010.1523/JNEUROSCI.3020-14.2014

            5. Achariyar TM, Li B, Peng W, Verghese PB, Shi Y, et al.. Glymphatic distribution of CSF-derived apoE into brain is isoform specific and suppressed during sleep deprivation. Mol Neurodegener. 2016. Vol. 11:74 2793126210.1186/s13024-016-0138-8

            6. Lundgaard I, Li B, Xie L, Kang H, Sanggaard S, et al.. Direct neuronal glucose uptake heralds activity-dependent increases in cerebral metabolism. Nat Commun. 2015. Vol. 6:6807 2590401810.1038/ncomms7807

            7. Rangroo Thrane V, Thrane AS, Plog BA, Thiyagarajan M, Iliff JJ, et al.. Paravascular microcirculation facilitates rapid lipid transport and astrocyte signaling in the brain. Sci Rep. 2013. Vol. 3:2582 2400244810.1038/srep02582

            8. Jessen NA, Munk AS, Lundgaard I, Nedergaard M. The glymphatic system: a beginner’s guide. Neurochem Res. 2015. Vol. 40:2583–99. 2594736910.1007/s11064-015-1581-6

            9. Xie L, Kang H, Xu Q, Chen MJ, Liao Y, et al.. Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science. 2013. Vol. 342:373–7. 2413697010.1126/science.1241224

            10. Benveniste H, Liu X, Koundal S, Sanggaard S, Lee H, et al.. The glymphatic system and waste clearance with brain aging: a review. Gerontology. 2019. Vol. 65:106–19. 2999613410.1159/000490349

            11. Mestre H, Kostrikov S, Mehta RI, Nedergaard M. Perivascular spaces, glymphatic dysfunction, and small vessel disease. Clin Sci (Lond). 2017. Vol. 131:2257–74. 2879807610.1042/CS20160381

            12. Charidimou A, Pantoni L, Love S. The concept of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: a road map on key definitions and current concepts. Int J Stroke. 2016. Vol. 11:6–18. 2676301610.1177/1747493015607485

            13. Zarow C, Lyness SA, Mortimer JA, Chui HC. Neuronal loss is greater in the locus coeruleus than nucleus basalis and substantia nigra in Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases. Arch Neurol. 2003. Vol. 60:337–41. 1263314410.1001/archneur.60.3.337

            14. Reeves BC, Karimy JK, Kundishora AJ, Mestre H, Cerci HM, et al.. Glymphatic system impairment in Alzheimer’s disease and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Trends Mol Med. 2020. Vol. 26:285–95. 3195951610.1016/j.molmed.2019.11.008

            15. Peng W, Achariyar TM, Li B, Liao Y, Mestre H, et al.. Suppression of glymphatic fluid transport in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2016. Vol. 93:215–25. 2723465610.1016/j.nbd.2016.05.015

            16. Plog BA, Dashnaw ML, Hitomi E, Peng W, Liao Y, et al.. Biomarkers of traumatic injury are transported from brain to blood via the glymphatic system. J Neurosci. 2015. Vol. 35:518–26. 2558974710.1523/JNEUROSCI.3742-14.2015

            17. Mondello S, Muller U, Jeromin A, Streeter J, Hayes RL, et al.. Blood-based diagnostics of traumatic brain injuries. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011. Vol. 11:65–78. 2117192210.1586/erm.10.104

            18. Tsitsopoulos PP, Marklund N. Amyloid-β Peptides and Tau protein as biomarkers in cerebrospinal and interstitial fluid following traumatic brain injury: a review of experimental and clinical studies. Front Neurol. 2013. Vol. 4:79 2380512510.3389/fneur.2013.00079

            19. Magnoni S, Esparza TJ, Conte V, Carbonara M, Carrabba G, et al.. Tau elevations in the brain extracellular space correlate with reduced amyloid-β levels and predict adverse clinical outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2012. Vol. 135:1268–80. 2211619210.1093/brain/awr286

            20. Morris M, Maeda S, Vossel K, Mucke L. The many faces of tau. Neuron. 2011. Vol. 70:410–26. 2155506910.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.009

            21. Gaberel T, Gakuba C, Goulay R, De Lizarrondo SM, Hanouz J-L, et al.. Impaired glymphatic perfusion after strokes revealed by contrast-enhanced MRI: a new target for fibrinolysis? Stroke. 2014. Vol. 45:3092–6. 2519043810.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006617

            22. Goulay R, Flament J, Gauberti M, Naveau M, Pasquet N, et al.. Subarachnoid hemorrhage severely impairs brain parenchymal cerebrospinal fluid circulation in nonhuman primate. Stroke. 2017. Vol. 48:2301–5. 2852676410.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017014

            23. Mestre H, Du T, Sweeney AM, Liu G, Samson AJ, et al.. Cerebrospinal fluid influx drives acute ischemic tissue swelling. Science. 2020. Vol. 367:eaax7171. 3200152410.1126/science.aax7171

            24. Jiang Q, Zhang L, Ding G, Davoodi-Bojd E, Li Q, et al.. Impairment of the glymphatic system after diabetes. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017. Vol. 37:1326–37. 2730675510.1177/0271678X16654702

            25. Vgontzas A, Pavlovic´ JM. Sleep disorders and migraine: review of literature and potential pathophysiology mechanisms. Headache. 2018. Vol. 58:1030–9. 3009116010.1111/head.13358

            26. Jost G, Frenzel T, Boyken J, Lohrke J, Nischwitz V, et al.. Long-term Excretion of gadolinium-based contrast agents: linear versus macrocyclic agents in an experimental rat model. Radiology. 2019. Vol. 290:340–8. 3042209110.1148/radiol.2018180135

            27. Robert P, Fingerhut S, Factor C, Vives V, Letien J, et al.. One-year retention of gadolinium in the brain: comparison of Gadodiamide and Gadoterate Meglumine in a rodent model. Radiology. 2018. Vol. 288:424–33. 2978648610.1148/radiol.2018172746

            28. European Medicines Agency. EMA’s final opinion confirms restrictions on use of linear gadolinium agents in body scans. 2017. 457616

            29. Lancelot E. Revisiting the pharmacokinetic profiles of gadolinium-based contrast agents: differences in long-term biodistribution and excretion. Invest Radiol. 2016. Vol. 51:691–700. 2717554610.1097/RLI.0000000000000280

            30. Berger F, Kubik-Huch RA, Niemann T, Schmid HR, Poetzsch M, et al.. Gadolinium distribution in cerebrospinal fluid after administration of a gadolinium-based MR contrast agent in humans. Radiology. 2018. Vol. 288:703–9. 2973795310.1148/radiol.2018171829

            31. Eide PK, Ringstad G. MRI with intrathecal MRI gadolinium contrast medium administration: a possible method to assess glymphatic function in human brain. Acta Radiol Open. 2015. Vol. 4:2058460115609635. 2663414710.1177/2058460115609635

            32. Eide PK, Vatnehol SAS, Emblem KE, Ringstad G. Magnetic resonance imaging provides evidence of glymphatic drainage from human brain to cervical lymph nodes. Sci Rep. 2018. Vol. 8:7194 2974012110.1038/s41598-018-25666-4

            33. Eide PK, Ringstad G. Delayed clearance of cerebrospinal fluid tracer from entorhinal cortex in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a glymphatic magnetic resonance imaging study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019. Vol. 39:1355–68. 2948534110.1177/0271678X18760974

            34. Taoka T, Masutani Y, Kawai H, Nakane T, Matsuoka K, et al.. Evaluation of glymphatic system activity with the diffusion MR technique: diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) in Alzheimer’s disease cases. Jpn J Radiol. 2017. Vol. 35:172–8. 2819782110.1007/s11604-017-0617-z

            35. Absinta M, Ha SK, Nair G, Sati P, Luciano NJ, et al.. Human and nonhuman primate meninges harbor lymphatic vessels that can be visualized noninvasively by MRI. Elife. 2017. Vol. 6:e29738. 2897179910.7554/eLife.29738

            36. Naganawa S, Nakane T, Kawai H, Taoka T. Age dependence of gadolinium leakage from the cortical veins into the cerebrospinal fluid assessed with whole brain 3D-real inversion recovery MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2019. Vol. 18:163–9. 3039327510.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0053

            37. Ohashi T, Naganawa S, Ogawa E, Katagiri T, Kuno K. Signal intensity of the cerebrospinal fluid after intravenous administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents: strong contrast enhancement around the vein of Labbe. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2019. Vol. 18:194–9. 3041618110.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0043

            38. Deike-Hofmann K, Reuter J, Haase R, Paech D, Gnirs R, et al.. Glymphatic pathway of gadolinium-based contrast agents through the brain: overlooked and misinterpreted. Invest Radiol. 2019. Vol. 54:229–37. 3048055410.1097/RLI.0000000000000533

            39. Taoka T, Jost G, Frenzel T, Naganawa S, Pietsch H. Impact of the glymphatic system on the kinetic and distribution of gadodiamide in the rat brain: observations by dynamic MRI and effect of circadian rhythm on tissue gadolinium concentrations. Invest Radiol. 2018. Vol. 53:529–34. 2965269910.1097/RLI.0000000000000473

            40. Liu DX, He X, Wu D, Zhang Q, Yang C, et al.. Continuous theta burst stimulation facilitates the clearance efficiency of the glymphatic pathway in a mouse model of sleep deprivation. Neurosci Lett. 2017. Vol. 653:189–94. 2857656610.1016/j.neulet.2017.05.064

            41. Lee S, Yoo RE, Choi SH, Oh S-H, Ji S, et al.. Contrast-enhanced MRI T1 mapping for quantitative evaluation of putative dynamic glymphatic activity in the human brain in sleep-wake states. Radiology. 2021. Vol. 300:661–8. 3415629910.1148/radiol.2021203784

            42. Mijnders LS, Steup FW, Lindhout M, van der Kleij PA, Brink WM, et al.. Optimal sequences and sequence parameters for GBCA-enhanced MRI of the glymphatic system: a systematic literature review. Acta Radiol. 2021. Vol. 62:1324–32. 3315327010.1177/0284185120969950

            43. Chen Y, Dai Z, Fan R, Mikulis DJ, Qiu J, et al.. Glymphatic system visualized by chemical-exchange-saturation-transfer magnetic resonance imaging. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020. Vol. 11:1978–84. 3249233310.1021/acschemneuro.0c00222

            44. Evans PG, Sokolska M, Alves A, Harrison IF, Ohene Y, et al.. Non-invasive MRI of blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier function. Nat Commun. 2020. Vol. 11:2081 3235027810.1038/s41467-020-16002-4

            Graphical abstract

            Key points
            • This review summarized the contributions of MRI to the research advances involving the human glymphatic system, followed by a consideration of prospective applications in the future.

            • DTI, CEST, ASL, and intravenously- or intrathecally-administrated macrocyclic GBCAs as MR methods can be used in human glymphatic system research.

            Author and article information

            Journal
            radsci
            Radiology Science
            Compuscript (Ireland )
            2811-5635
            21 March 2023
            : 2
            : 1
            : 22-28
            Affiliations
            [a ]Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
            [b ]Department of Radiology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou 515031, China
            [c ]Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Medical College of Shantou University, Shantou 515041, China
            Author notes
            *Correspondence: rhwu@ 123456stu.edu.cn (R. Wu)
            Article
            10.15212/RADSCI-2022-0011
            87a1a041-7bc2-44a3-a5e0-c11762c8e57e
            Copyright © 2023 The Authors.

            This work is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.

            History
            : 20 October 2022
            : 28 January 2023
            : 26 February 2023
            Page count
            Figures: 1, References: 44, Pages: 7
            Funding
            Funded by: National Science Foundation of China
            Award ID: 82020108016
            This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82020108016).
            Categories
            Original Research

            Medicine,Radiology & Imaging
            human glymphatic system,MRI

            Comments

            Comment on this article