Smart CitationsSee how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
- Record: found
- Abstract: found
- Article: found
Inconsistency of Special Relativity
Content
Author and article information
References
Einstein A.. Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper [AdP 17, 891 (1905)]. Annalen der Physik. Vol. 14(S1):194–224. 2005. Wiley. [Cross Ref]
McCREA W. H.. The Clock Paradox in Relativity Theory. Nature. Vol. 167(4252)1951. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]
Dingle Herbert. A Problem in Relativity Theory. Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A. Vol. 69(12):925–934. 1956. IOP Publishing. [Cross Ref]
Monti Roberto A.. Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis. Physics Essays. Vol. 9(2):238–260. 1996. Physics Essays Publication. [Cross Ref]
Van Flandern Tom. The speed of gravity — What the experiments say. Physics Letters A. Vol. 250(1-3):1–11. 1998. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]
Builder Geoffrey. The Resolution of the Clock Paradox. Philosophy of Science. Vol. 26(2):135–144. 1959. Cambridge University Press (CUP). [Cross Ref]
Balaci Octavian. Connection between Gravity and Electromagnetism. Astronomical Review. Vol. 9(1):4–28. 2014. Informa UK Limited. [Cross Ref]
Brown Burniston. What is wrong with relativity? Physics Bulletin. Vol. 18(3):71–76. 1967. IOP Publishing. [Cross Ref]
Wang Ling Jun. Physics needs nothing less than a Renaissance – On the relation between physics and philosophy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 1466(1)2020. IOP Publishing. [Cross Ref]
Hafele J. C., Keating Richard E.. Around-the-World Atomic Clocks: Observed Relativistic Time Gains. Science. Vol. 177(4044):168–170. 1972. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). [Cross Ref]
DINGLE H.. The Case Against Special Relativity. Nature. Vol. 216(5111):119–122. 1967. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]
Redzic D.V.. Relativistic length agony continued. Serbian Astronomical Journal. (188):55–65. 2014. National Library of Serbia. [Cross Ref]
M. Kassir Radwan. The Critical Error in the Formulation of the Special Relativity. International Journal of Physics. Vol. 2(6):197–201. 2014. Science and Education Publishing Co., Ltd. [Cross Ref]
Gron O. A symmetrical version of the clock paradox. European Journal of Physics. Vol. 9(1):71–74. 1988. IOP Publishing. [Cross Ref]
Soni Vidwan Singh. A simple solution of the twin paradox also shows anomalous behaviour of rigidly connected distant clocks. European Journal of Physics. Vol. 23(2):225–231. 2002. IOP Publishing. [Cross Ref]
Dray Tevian. The twin paradox revisited. American Journal of Physics. Vol. 58(9):822–825. 1990. American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT). [Cross Ref]
Hayes Peter. The Ideology of Relativity: The Case of the Clock Paradox. Social Epistemology. Vol. 23(1):57–78. 2009. Informa UK Limited. [Cross Ref]