97
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      📅  April 10 – your deadline for Abstract submission to the 2025 EASE Conference poster competition!  SUBMIT HERE

      Share your latest research, editorial best practices, effective workflows or community development successes as a poster at the Oslo Conference.

      scite_
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Smart Citations
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
      View Citations

      See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

      scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Trustworthy and Quality Journals: A Multi-stakeholder Perspective

      Published
      conference-abstract
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5
      ScienceOpen
      18th EASE General Assembly and Conference (EASE GA)
      Editing in the age of misinformation
      14-16 May 2025
      Academic publishing, Scholarly publishing, Editorial standards, Predatory publishing
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            In today’s rapidly evolving academic landscape, defining reliable characteristics of quality and integrity and distinguishing between reputable and unreliable journals has become increasingly challenging. With the proliferation of questionable journals and publishers, researchers are at risk of unknowingly publishing in venues that lack academic rigor or ethical standards. This session will discuss resources and organizations dedicated to safeguarding scholarly publishing and offer strategies to assess the credibility of journals in different disciplines while avoiding exploitative practices, based on the publishing industry standards and regulatory bodies.

            This session will be structured in four individual presentations followed by a Q&A and debate with the audience and the online participants.

            1) Academic Journals in Temporarily Occupied Territories: The Ukrainian Case and a Worldwide ChallengeIryna Izarova, Ukraine

            In this presentation, I will highlight the threat posed to academic publishing by journals operating under dubious circumstances in temporarily occupied territories. Drawing on the Ukrainian experience, I will examine how occupants appropriate Ukrainian academic journals, infringe on legitimate titles, archives, misuse ISSNs, and jeopardise scholarly credibility by disseminating manipulated or biased information.These challenges go far beyond Ukraine, as similar cases have been observed globally. By discussing possible legal remedies, broader ethical implications, and measures for protecting academic integrity, I hope to encourage international dialogue on how editors and publishers can address the unique risks of publishing in conflict-affected regions.

            2) DOAJ’s role to support quality and trust in scholarly publishingJoanna Ball, Denmark

            The Directory of Open Access Journals is a unique and extensive index of diverse peer-reviewed open access journals covering all disciplines, geographies and languages. Its rigorous selection criteria are a global gold standard for open access journal publishing, trusted across the community. This session will explore how DOAJ’s criteria, review processes, and initiatives to enhance publishing standards build trust in quality open access journals, and give examples of how libraries integrate DOAJ into their workflows and services: to provide access to trusted open access content, to advise on publication venues, and to implement open access policies.

            3) Learning the art of open access publishing in a time of ambiguity – Think.Check.Submit. as a teaching toolSofie Wennström, Sweden

            In a time of many publishing offers, it is essential to find reliable guidance about trustworthy publishers. This presentation aims to describe how Think.Check.Submit can be used as a tool for learning more about best publishing practices and as well as a quality benchmark for journals.

            4) Building Trust in Scholarly Communication: A Librarian’s Perspective from BangladeshShaharima Parvin, Bangladesh

            The information landscape has been transforming due to the emergence of digital technologies and overloaded information. This transformation has necessitated a re-examination of trustworthiness and credibility in scholarly communication within the digital realm. This presentation will explore the role of Library and Information Science (LIS) professionals in Bangladesh for promoting transparency, integrity, and accessibility in the practice of academic publishing. It will also discuss the effects of misinformation, predatory journals, or other factors that restrict open access which would influence the reliability and quality of the scholarly outputs.

            Furthermore, this presentation will highlight strategies adopted by academic libraries in Bangladesh towards combating misinformation among faculty and students, promoting journal publishing ethics, and enhancing scholarly communication through institutional repositories and open science initiatives. Librarians can play a pivotal role in building a more reliable and inclusive global knowledge ecosystem by strengthening research support systems and encouraging collaboration.

            Author and article information

            Conference
            ScienceOpen
            25 March 2025
            Affiliations
            [1 ] MDPI, Spain ( https://ror.org/00ckv2g77)
            [2 ] Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine ( https://ror.org/02aaqv166)
            [3 ] DOAJ, Denmark ( https://ror.org/05amyt365)
            [4 ] Stockholm University Library, Sweden ( https://ror.org/05f0yaq80)
            [5 ] East West University, Bangladesh ( https://ror.org/05p0tzt32)
            Author notes
            Author information
            https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5233-3606
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1909-7020
            https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1229-7019
            https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9349-2195
            Article
            10.14293/EASE.2025.010
            34c47986-4fe3-4f40-9354-678bddaa6c3e
            Copyright @ 2025
            18th EASE General Assembly and Conference
            EASE GA
            18
            The Legenes Hus Conference Centre, Oslo, Norway
            14-16 May 2025
            JAMS; Scholastica; ScienceOpen; Paradigm Publishing Services; ARPHA; AVES
            Editing in the age of misinformation
            History
            Product

            ScienceOpen

            Categories

            Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
            Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Information & Library science
            Academic publishing,Scholarly publishing,Editorial standards,Predatory publishing

            Comments

            Comment on this article