1,281
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      UK Computing Summit 2025: Navigating change (surviving and beyond) - 29-30 April @ Sheffield Hallam University - Register here.

      scite_
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Smart Citations
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
      View Citations

      See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

      scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      A Systematic Review of Usefulness Design Goals of Occupational mHealth Apps for Healthcare Workers.

      Published
      proceedings-article
      , , ,
      34th British HCI Conference (HCI2021)
      Post-pandemic HCI – Living Digitally
      20th - 21st July 2021
      mHealth Apps, Occupational ill-health, Usefulness, Usability, Utility, User Experience, Healthcare Workers
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2021
            July 2021
            : 214-219
            Affiliations
            [0001]University of West London

            St. Mary’s Road, Ealing, UK
            [0002]University of West London

            UK and ITI/Larsys, Portugal
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/HCI2021.22
            1970d01a-8858-4cb6-b046-c3797d8176cd
            © Yingta et al. Published by BCS Learning & Development Ltd. Proceedings of the BCS 34th British HCI Conference 2021, UK

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            34th British HCI Conference
            HCI2021
            34
            London, UK
            20th - 21st July 2021
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Post-pandemic HCI – Living Digitally
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/HCI2021.22
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            mHealth Apps,Usefulness,User Experience,Usability,Utility,Healthcare Workers,Occupational ill-health

            REFERENCES

            1. and (2019) ‘Usability Issues in Mental Health Applications’, in. ACM, pp. 343–348. doi: 10.1145/3314183.3323676.

            2. and (2020) ‘Elderly users’ acceptance of mHealth user interface (UI) design-based culture: the moderator role of age’, Journal on multimodal user interfaces, 14(1), pp. 49–59. doi: 10.1007/s12193-019-00307-w.

            3. , and (2018) ‘Design for mobile mental health: an exploratory review’. Available at: http://uwl.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlVxLSwMxEB5sT16komK1ylxFWrOvNumtVBevRS97Ckl2FqS1gu3i3-8kqSie7DkhGWZI5pvHNwBZOhLDP39CQqm0jcqdTYRNnJN1qqwjQ03RMMQIuZ1SVousqnxPzf03NcYnzjdvvtw8ar9We3oVW4l81mv7UDAc6UAnE76Z6yVfBAex-uUgyh6c7JEdzqIpTuGI1mcwfgwdEsjQEN8_LD9BjNP0MRIQp2jWSKEPLpS7MVJJzkGUT6_z5yHfo6MUG-1HNP9Iqv2Scbpdai9fdgFdjuTpEjBXTghWmUwMx1VFY5yica0mQtaMA2rqw92_j706YO81HLOfD2Nc08kAutvPlm6Cqm6D2nYJdYWB.

            4. , and (2020) ‘Burnout and somatic symptoms among frontline healthcare professionals at the peak of the Italian COVID-19 pandemic’, Psychiatry research, 290, p. 113129. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113129.

            5. et al. (2014) ‘Evaluating and selecting mobile health apps: strategies for healthcare providers and healthcare organizations’, Translational Behavioral Medicine, 4(4), pp. 363–371. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0293-9.

            6. et al. (1997) ‘Towards viable, useful and usable human factors design guidance’, Applied ergonomics, 28(5), pp. 311–322. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(97)00012-4.

            7. , and (2019) ‘Current Knowledge and Adoption of Mobile Health Apps Among Australian General Practitioners: Survey Study’, JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(6), pp. e13199–e13199. doi:10.2196/13199.

            8. (2018) ‘Do mental health mobile apps work: evidence and recommendations for designing high-efficacy mental health mobile apps’, mHealth, 4(Journal Article), pp. 6–6. doi:10.21037/mhealth.2018.03.02.

            9. , and (2007) ‘GeoHealth: a location-based service for nomadic home healthcare workers’, in. ACM, pp. 273–281. doi: 10.1145/1324892.1324951.

            10. et al. (2020) ‘A Pilot Evaluation of a Smartphone Application for Workplace Depression’, International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(18), p. 6753. doi:10.3390/ijerph17186753.

            11. (1989) ‘Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology’, MIS quarterly, 13(3), pp. 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008.

            12. et al. (2015) ‘Perspectives on the evolution of mobile (mHealth) technologies and application to rehabilitation’, Physical therapy, 95(3), p. 397.

            13. , and (2013) ‘The use of personal digital assistants in clinical decision making by health care professionals: A systematic review’, Health informatics journal, 19(1), pp. 16–28. doi:10.1177/1460458212446761.

            14. et al. (2020) ‘A user-centred design framework for mHealth’, PloS one, 15(8), p. e0237910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237910.

            15. et al. (2015) ‘mHealth Stakeholder Integration: A gamification-based Framework-approach towards behavioural change’, in. ACM, pp. 268–274. doi: 10.1145/2837126.2837153.

            16. , and (2020) ‘Supporting the well-being of healthcare workers during and after COVID-19’, Occupational medicine (Oxford, England), 70. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqaa096.

            17. and (2007) ‘Factors Influencing Expectations of e-Health Services within a Direct-Effects Model of User Satisfaction’, E-service journal, 5(2), pp. 85–112. doi:10.2979/ESJ.2007.5.2.85.

            18. (2014) ‘Deriving Usability Goals for Mobile Applications’, in. ACM, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1145/2643572.2643576.

            19. et al. (2019) ‘Usability Challenges for Health and Wellness Mobile Apps: Mixed-Methods Study Among mHealth Experts and Consumers’, JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(1), p. e12160. doi:10.2196/12160.

            20. et al. (2020) ‘Prevalence and predictors of PTSS during COVID-19 outbreak in China hardest-hit areas: Gender differences matter’, Psychiatry research, 287, p. 112921. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112921.

            21. and (2014) ‘What does it mean for a system to be useful?: an exploratory study of usefulness’, in. ACM, pp. 885–894. doi:10.1145/2598510.2598600.

            22. , and (2013) ‘A conceptual framework for designing mHealth solutions for developing countries’, in. ACM, pp. 31–36. doi: 10.1145/2491148.2491154.

            23. (1994) ‘Usability inspection methods’, in Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 413–414.

            24. , and (2007) ‘An Approach to the Evaluation of Usefulness as a Social Construct Using Technological Frames’, International journal of human-computer interaction, 22(1–2), pp. 153–172. doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc2201-02_8.

            25. et al. (2015) ‘Healthcare workers’ perceptions and experiences on using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis’, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015(11). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011942.

            26. et al. (2017) ‘Understanding initial experiences with Mindmax, an mHealth app that draws on shared interests in sports and video games’, in. ACM, pp. 438–442. doi:10.1145/3152771.3156152.

            27. and (2018) ‘Ten factors to consider when developing usability scenarios and tasks for health information technology’, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 78, pp. 123–133. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.01.001.

            28. et al. (2016) ‘A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps)’, Journal of biomedical informatics, 60(Journal Article), pp. 243–251. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.02.002.

            29. et al. (2020) ‘Characteristics of and Factors Influencing College Nursing Students’ Willingness to Utilize mHealth for Health Promotion’, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN, 38(5), pp. 246–255. doi:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000600.

            30. et al. (2018) ‘Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements’, Evidence-based mental health, 21(3), pp. 116–119.

            31. and (2019) ‘The Continued Use of Mobile Health Apps: Insights From a Longitudinal Study’, JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(8), pp. e12983–e12983. doi: 10.2196/12983.

            32. (2014) ‘Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits’, P&T (Lawrenceville, N.J.), 39(5), pp. 356–364.

            33. and (2012) ‘Review of health information technology usability study methodologies’, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 19(3), pp. 413–422. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000020.

            Comments

            Comment on this article