626
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares

      UK Computing Summit 2025: Navigating change (surviving and beyond) - 29-30 April @ Sheffield Hallam University - Register here.

      scite_
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Smart Citations
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
      View Citations

      See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

      scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      The Depth and Complexity of Traditional Painting Versus AI-Generated Art: A comparative analysis using Van Eyck's Arnolfini Portrait

      Published
      proceedings-article
      , , ,
      Proceedings of EVA London 2024 (EVA 2024)
      Since 1990, the EVA London Conference has established itself as one of the United Kingdom’s most innovative and interdisciplinary conferences in the field of digital visualisation. The papers and abstracts in this volume cover areas such as the arts, culture, heritage, museums, music, performance, visual art, and visualisation, as well as related interdisciplinary areas, in combination with technology. The latest research and work by early career researchers, established scholars, practitioners, research students, and visual artists, can be found in this volume, published in full colour.
      8–12 July 2024
      Artificial intelligence, Generative Art, Jan van Eyck, Arnolfini portrait, Aesthetics
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2024
            July 2024
            : 69-77
            Affiliations
            [0001]Shenzhen International School of Design, Harbin Institute of Technology

            Shenzhen, China
            [0002]Shandong University

            Jinan

            Shandong

            China
            [0003]Peking University

            Haidian District

            Beijing

            China
            [0004]Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, and Hong Kong Polytechnic U.

            Hong Kong SAR, China
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/EVA2024.12
            045ebfc2-be49-4e60-941c-fb0d2a353c4a
            © Guo et al. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of EVA London 2024, UK

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            Proceedings of EVA London 2024
            EVA 2024
            London
            8–12 July 2024
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Since 1990, the EVA London Conference has established itself as one of the United Kingdom’s most innovative and interdisciplinary conferences in the field of digital visualisation. The papers and abstracts in this volume cover areas such as the arts, culture, heritage, museums, music, performance, visual art, and visualisation, as well as related interdisciplinary areas, in combination with technology. The latest research and work by early career researchers, established scholars, practitioners, research students, and visual artists, can be found in this volume, published in full colour.
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/EVA2024.12
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            Arnolfini portrait,Jan van Eyck,Artificial intelligence,Aesthetics,Generative Art

            REFERENCES

            1. Albers, J. (2013) Interaction of color. Yale University Press.

            2. Anadol, R. (2019) Machine hallucination.

            3. Anonymous (2020) Book reviews – van eyck. https://hnanews.org/hnar/reviews/van-eyck/. Accessed: 2023-10-31.

            4. Birnbaum, D. (2023) Arthur c. danto – artforum. Accessed: 2023-10-31.

            5. Boden, M. A. (2016) AI: Its nature and future. Oxford University Press.

            6. Borchert, T.-H., Dumolyn, J., & Martens, M. P. (2020) Van Eyck. Thames and Hudson.

            7. Cao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Dai, Y., Yu, P. S., & Sun, L. (2023) A comprehensive survey of ai-generated content (aigc): A history of generative ai from gan to chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04226.

            8. Cohn, G. (2018) Ai art at christie’s sells for 432, 500.. Accessed: 2023-10-31.

            9. Collier, J. M. & Carleton, D. L. (1983) Perspective in the arnolfini portrait. The Art Bulletin, 65(4), 691–692.

            10. Colton, S. (2012) The painting fool: Stories from building an automated painter. In Computers and creativity (pp. 3–38). Springer.

            11. Colton, S., Wiggins, G. A., et al. (2012) Computational creativity: The final frontier? In Ecai, volume 12 (pp. 21–26).: Montpelier.

            12. Criminisi, A., Kemp, M., & Kang, S. B. (2004) Reflections of reality in jan van eyck and robert campin. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 37(3), 109122.

            13. Simon, G. (2021) Jan van eyck’s perspectival system elucidated through computer vision. Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 4(2), 1–8.

            14. Ward, J. L. (1994) Disguised symbolism as enactive symbolism in van eyck’s paintings. Artibus et historiae, (pp. 9–53).

            15. Ward, J. L. & Carleton, D. L. (1983) On the mathematics of the perspective of the arnolfini portrait and similar works of jan van eyck. The Art Bulletin, 65(4), 680–690.

            16. Weiss, D. M. (1995) Artificial intelligence and the return of the repressed. Southwest Philosophy Review, 11(2), 207–228.

            17. Danto, A. C. (1981) The transfiguration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art. Harvard University Press.

            18. Doehlemann, K. (1906) Die Perspektive der Brüder van Eyck. Teubner.

            19. Du Sautoy, M. (2019) The creativity code. In The Creativity Code. Harvard University Press.

            20. Elgammal, A., Liu, B., Elhoseiny, M., & Mazzone, M. (2017) Can: Creative adversarial networks, generating” art” by learning about styles and deviating from style norms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.07068.

            21. Elkins, J. (1991) On the arnolfini portrait and the lucca madonna: Did jan van eyck have a perspectival system? The Art Bulletin, 73(1), 53–62.

            22. Elkins, J. (2019) What painting is. Routledge.

            23. Zhang, K. & Yu, J. (2016) Generation of kandinsky art. Leonardo, 49(1), 48–54.

            24. Deep Dream Generator (2023) Deep Dream Generator – Trending Dreams. Available at: https://deepdreamgenerator.com/ (Accessed: 31 October 2023).

            25. Gombrich, E. H. & Gombrich, E. (1995) The story of art, volume 12. Phaidon London.

            26. Gregory, R. L. (2008) A perception of perception. Inside Psychology: A science over 50 years, (pp. 119).

            27. Hall, E. (1997) The Arnolfini betrothal: medieval marriage and the enigma of Van Eyck’s double portrait, volume 3. Univ of California Press.

            28. Hanley, S. J. (2007) The optical concerns of Jan van Eyck’s painting practice. PhD thesis, University of York.

            29. Harbison, C. (2012) Jan van Eyck: the play of realism. Reaktion Books.

            30. Jacobsen, T. (2002) Kandinsky’s questionnaire revisited: fundamental correspondence of basic colors and forms? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95(3), 903–913.

            31. Kandinsky, W. (2012) Concerning the spiritual in art. Courier Corporation.

            32. Levin, J. (2002) How the Universe Got Its Spots: Diary of a Finite Time in a Finite Space. Princeton University Press.

            33. McCormack, J., Gifford, T., & Hutchings, P. (2019) Autonomy, authenticity, authorship and intention in computer generated art. In International conference on computational intelligence in music, sound, art and design (part of EvoStar) (pp. 35–50).: Springer.

            34. McCosker, A. & Wilken, R. (2014) Rethinking ‘big data’as visual knowledge: The sublime and the diagrammatic in data visualisation. Visual Studies, 29(2), 155–164.

            35. Mineo, L. (2023) Is art generated by artificial intelligence real art? – Harvard Gazette. [Online; accessed 31-October-2023].

            36. Yup, K. (2023) “What AI art means for society, according to Yale experts”, Yale Daily News. Available at: https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2023/01/23/what-ai-art-means-for-society-according-to-yale-experts/. Accessed: 31 October 2023.

            37. OpenAI (2023) Dall·e 3. Accessed: 2023-10-31.

            38. Osborne, H. (1952). Theory of beauty an introduction to aesthetics.

            39. Panofsky, E. (1966) Early netherlandish painting: its origins and character, vol. 1.

            40. Schaverien, J. (2005) Art, dreams and active imagination: A post-jungian approach to transference and the image. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 50(2), 127–153.

            41. Seidel, L. (1989) “jan van eyck’s arnolfini portrait”: Business as usual? Critical Inquiry, 16(1), 55–86.

            Comments

            Comment on this article