56
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      UK Computing Summit 2025: Navigating change (surviving and beyond) - 29-30 April @ Sheffield Hallam University - Register here.

      scite_
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Smart Citations
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
      View Citations

      See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

      scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Information Processing Biases Caused by Device Associations

      Published
      proceedings-article
      , ,
      37th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference (BCS HCI 24)
      The International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference in 2024 was supported by the BCS Interactions Special Interest Group and hosted by the University of Central Lancashire in Preston. The BCS HCI Conference welcomed submissions on all aspects of human-computer interaction. Topics included: user experience (UX), usability testing, interaction design (IxD), human-centred AI (HCAI), education, health, sustainability, the Internet of Things (IoT), interaction technologies, and emerging interactive applications.
      15–17 July 2024
      information processing, cognition, associations, devices
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2024
            July 2024
            : 35-46
            Affiliations
            [0001]University College Dublin

            Dublin

            Ireland
            [0002]University of Manchester

            Manchester

            United Kingdom
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2024.5
            de45056b-ffdb-4e4e-9529-211e844e19a9
            © Steeds et al. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of BCS HCI 2024, UK

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            37th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference
            BCS HCI 24
            37
            University of Central Lancashire (UCLan)
            15–17 July 2024
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            The International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference in 2024 was supported by the BCS Interactions Special Interest Group and hosted by the University of Central Lancashire in Preston. The BCS HCI Conference welcomed submissions on all aspects of human-computer interaction. Topics included: user experience (UX), usability testing, interaction design (IxD), human-centred AI (HCAI), education, health, sustainability, the Internet of Things (IoT), interaction technologies, and emerging interactive applications.
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2024.5
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            cognition,associations,devices,information processing

            REFERENCES

            1. APA Dictionary of Psychology (2018). Definition of priming. https://dictionary.apa.org/priming Last accessed 18th September 2024.

            2. and (1991). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing letters 2(2), 159–170.

            3. (1933). Reaction time and chronological age. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 30(6), 801–803.

            4. , , , , , , , , , , et al. (2007). Modulation of emotion by cognition and cognition by emotion. Neuroimage 35(1), 430–440.

            5. , , , , and (2012). ” yours is better!” participant response bias in hci. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1321–1330.

            6. , , , and (2012). A systematic meta-analysis of the stroop task in depression. Clinical psychology review 32(4), 316–328.

            7. , , , and (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of personality and social psychology 82(6), 878–902.

            8. , , , and (2010). Emotional priming effects during stroop task performance. Neuroimage 49(3), 2662–2670.

            9. (1997). Emotion experienced during encoding enhances odor retrieval cue effectiveness. American Journal of Psychology 110, 489–506.

            10. , L.-, and (2005). Attentional bias for negative self-words in young women the role of thin ideal priming and body shape dissatisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences 38(3), 723–733.

            11. and (2013). Home computing unplugged: why, where and when people use different connected devices at home. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing, New York, USA, pp. 627–636. ACM.

            12. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with colornaming. The American journal of psychology 77(4), 576–588.

            13. La , der Heijden, and (1985). Semantic priming and stroop-like interference in word-naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11(1), 62.

            14. , , and (2006). Lexical characteristics of words used in emotional stroop experiments. Emotion 6(1), 62.

            15. , , , , and (2020). An erp study of the temporal course of gender–color stroop effect. Frontiers in Psychology 11, 613196.

            16. , , A˚ . A˚ hman, , and (2006). The stroop effect on the internet. Computers in human behavior 22(3), 448–455.

            17. and D. Wang (2016). How does the device change your choice: A goal-activation perspective. In International Conference on HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations, pp. 446–456. Springer.

            18. , , , , , and (2004). Relations between emotion, memory, and attention: Evidence from taboo stroop, lexical decision, and immediate memory tasks. Memory & cognition 32(3), 474–488.

            19. , , and (2015). Semantic similarity between old and new items produces false alarms in recognition memory. Psychological research 79(5), 785–794.

            20. , , and (2007). Auditory stroop reveals implicit gender associations in adults and children. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43(2), 287–294.

            21. Naveh-, , and -Shaul (2002). Age-related differences in cued recall: Effects of support at encoding and retrieval. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 9(4), 276–287.

            22. , , and (2020). Why can’t we be separated from our smartphones? the vital roles of smartphone activity in smartphone separation anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior 109, 106351.

            23. , , , and (2019). Understanding the social acceptability of mobile devices using the stereotype content model. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 361. ACM.

            24. (1995). Effects of taboo words on colornaming performance on a stroop test. Perceptual and Motor Skills 81(3 suppl), 1119–1122.

            25. , , , and (2019). A stroop in the hand is worth two on the laptop: Superior reliability of a smartphone based alcohol stroop in the real world. Substance use & misuse 54(4), 692–698.

            26. , , and (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. science 333(6043), 776–778.

            27. , , and (2021). Device uses and device stereotypes. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 4, 100100.

            28. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of experimental psychology 18(6), 643–662.

            29. , , , and (1986). Colour naming of phobia-related words. British journal of Psychology 77(1), 97–108.

            30. and (2009). Think women, think warm: Stereotype content activation in women with a salient gender identity, using a modified stroop task. Sex roles 60(3-4), 247–260.

            Comments

            Comment on this article