301
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      UK Computing Summit 2025: Navigating change (surviving and beyond) - 29-30 April @ Sheffield Hallam University - Register here.

      scite_
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Smart Citations
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
      View Citations

      See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

      scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Wearables, Healthcare-Computer Interaction and the Internet of Obscure Medical Things

      Published
      proceedings-article
      , ,
      37th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference (BCS HCI 24)
      The International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference in 2024 was supported by the BCS Interactions Special Interest Group and hosted by the University of Central Lancashire in Preston. The BCS HCI Conference welcomed submissions on all aspects of human-computer interaction. Topics included: user experience (UX), usability testing, interaction design (IxD), human-centred AI (HCAI), education, health, sustainability, the Internet of Things (IoT), interaction technologies, and emerging interactive applications.
      15–17 July 2024
      Clinical Trials, Wearables, Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), Version Reporting
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2024
            July 2024
            : 225-229
            Affiliations
            [0001]Keele University

            Staffordshire, UK
            [0002]Manchester Metropolitan University

            Manchester, UK
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2024.22
            3dca5901-66c4-4d60-a0d8-19db32dab52d
            © Khattak et al. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of BCS HCI 2024, UK

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            37th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference
            BCS HCI 24
            37
            University of Central Lancashire (UCLan)
            15–17 July 2024
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            The International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference in 2024 was supported by the BCS Interactions Special Interest Group and hosted by the University of Central Lancashire in Preston. The BCS HCI Conference welcomed submissions on all aspects of human-computer interaction. Topics included: user experience (UX), usability testing, interaction design (IxD), human-centred AI (HCAI), education, health, sustainability, the Internet of Things (IoT), interaction technologies, and emerging interactive applications.
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2024.22
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            Clinical Trials,Version Reporting,Internet of Medical Things (IoMT),Wearables

            REFERENCES

            1. ButcherN.J., MonsourA., MewE.J., ChanA.W., MoherD., Mayo-WilsonE., TerweeC.B., Chee-A-TowA., BabaA., GavinF. and GrimshawJ.M. (2022) Guidelines for reporting outcomes in trial reports: the CONSORT-outcomes 2022 extension. JAMA, 328(22), pp.2252–2264.

            2. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2017) Sleep to Activate Mood Promotion (STAMP). National Institutes of Health. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02413294 (Accessed: June 2024)

            3. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2019) Feasibility of a Wearableenabled Intervention for Promoting Physical Activity in People Knee OA (TRACK-OA). National Institutes of Health. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02313506 (Accessed: June 2024)

            4. ClinicalTrials.gov (2020) Stay Strong: A Physical Activity Program for Afghanistan and Iraq Veterans. National Institutes of Health. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02360293 (Accessed: June 2024).

            5. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2021) Theory Based Intervention Program to Support Physical Activity for Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: a Case Series. National Institutes of Health. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02335450 (Accessed: June 2024)

            6. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023a) About ClinicalTrials.gov. National Institutes of Health. https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/about-ctg (Accessed: May 2024)

            7. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023b) Exergame Study for Family Caregivers. National Institutes of Health. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05032872 (Accessed: June 2024)

            8. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2024). Prescription Digital Therapeutic for the Treatment of Insomnia (SLEEP-I). National Institutes of Health. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04909229 (Accessed: June 2024)

            9. CollbergC., ProebstingT. and WarrenA.M. (2015) Repeatability and benefaction in computer systems research. University Arizona TR, 14(4). CollinsT., WoolleyS.I., OnianiS., PiresI.M., GarciaN.M., LedgerS. and PandyanA. (2019) Version reporting and assessment approaches for new and updated activity and heart rate monitors. Sensors, 19(7):1705.

            10. ColvonenP.J., (2021). Response to: Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors. NPJ Digital Medicine, 4(1), p.38.

            11. Epilepsy Foundation (2019). Seizure-alerting Device Recently Approved by FDA Received Early Support from the Epilepsy Foundation https://www.epilepsy.com/stories/seizurealerting-device-recently-approved-fda-receivedearly-support-epilepsy-foundation (Accessed: July 2024).

            12. FDA (2018). De Novo Classification Request for Irregular Rhythm Notification Feature, Submission number DEN180042. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/DEN180042.pdf (Accessed: July 2024).

            13. Fitbit. (2023). Important safety and product information. https://www.fitbit.com/global/uk/legal/safetyinstructions (Accessed: May 2024).

            14. Garmin. (2023). Activity tracking and fitness metric accuracy. https://www.garmin.com/en-US/legal/atdisclaimer/ (Accessed: May 2024).

            15. GiddensL., LeidnerD. and GonzalezE. (2017) The role of Fitbits in corporate wellness programs: Does step count matter? 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3627–3635.

            16. KhattakK.A. (2020) Wearable health devices–Updates, applications and repeatability. In Proceedings of the 33rd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference, pp. 64–66.

            17. KhattakK. A., and WoolleyS.I. (2023) A survey of wearable tracker version updates. In Proceedings of the 36th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference.

            18. KrügerS. and Ni BhroinN. (2020) Vital signs: Innovations in self-tracking health insurance and social change, Journal of Media Innovations, 6(1), pp. 93–108.

            19. StergiopoulosS., GetzK.A. and BlazynskiC. (2019) Evaluating the completeness of ClinicalTrials. gov. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 53(3), pp.307–317.

            20. WalterJ.R., XuS. and RogersJ.A., (2024). From lab to life: how wearable devices can improve health equity. Nature Communications, 15(1), p.123.

            21. WoolleyS., (2023), Wearables and connected health futures. ITNOW, 65(1), pp.24–25.

            22. WuD.T., HanauerD.A., MeiQ., ClarkP.M., AnL.C., ProulxJ., ZengQ.T., VydiswaranV.V., Collins-ThompsonK. and ZhengK., (2016).

            23. Assessing the readability of ClinicalTrials. gov. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(2), pp.269–275.

            24. ZarinD.A., TseT., WilliamsR.J., CaliffR.M. and IdeN.C., (2011). The ClinicalTrials. gov results database—update and key issues. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(9), pp.852–860.

            Comments

            Comment on this article