Combining iterative mockup prototyping with paired scales feedback

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Header Abstract Content Author and article information REFERENCES Comments

Record: found
Abstract: found
Conference Proceedings: found

Is Open Access

Combining iterative mockup prototyping with paired scales feedback

Published

proceedings-article

Author(s): Kanar Hama Salih , Göksel Mısırlı , Gordon Rugg

Publication date (Print): July 2024

Conference name: 37th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference (BCS HCI 24)

Conference theme: The International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference in 2024 was supported by the BCS Interactions Special Interest Group and hosted by the University of Central Lancashire in Preston. The BCS HCI Conference welcomed submissions on all aspects of human-computer interaction. Topics included: user experience (UX), usability testing, interaction design (IxD), human-centred AI (HCAI), education, health, sustainability, the Internet of Things (IoT), interaction technologies, and emerging interactive applications.

Conference date: 15–17 July 2024

Keywords: Iterative Prototyping, Design Terminology, Ontology

Bookmark

Abstract

Content

Author and article information

Contributors

Kanar Hama Salih

Göksel Mısırlı

Gordon Rugg

Conference

Publication date: July 2024

Publication date (Print): July 2024

Pages: 219-224

Affiliations

[0001]School of Computer Science and Mathematics

Keele University, UK

Article

DOI: 10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2024.21

SO-VID: b69ea8b1-92b9-4625-a38a-7a7946847b91

License:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Conference name: 37th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference

Conference acronym: BCS HCI 24

Conference number: 37

Conference location: University of Central Lancashire (UCLan)

Conference date: 15–17 July 2024

Conference sponsor: Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)

History

Product

1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2024.21

Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/

REFERENCES

ArpR., SmithB., SpearA. D. (2015). Building Ontologies With Basic Formal Ontology. The MIT Press, London.
BalajiS. and MurugaiyanM.S. (2012). Waterfall Vs V-Model Vs Agile: A Comparative Study on SDLC. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management.
BelkinN.J. , OddyR. N. & Brooks (1982) H. M. ASK for Information Retrieval: Part I, Background Theory. Journal of Documentation, 38(2).
BemS.L. (1974), “The measurement of psychological androgyny”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 42 No2, pp. 155–162.
Boehm., B.W. 1988. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer. 21 (5), pp 61–72.
BosW. and TarnaiC. (1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 659–671.
CaneF. (1951). The artist in each of us. London, England. Thames and Hudson.
CamburnB., ViswanathanV., LinseyJ., AndersonD., JensenD., CrawfordR., OttoK. and WoodK. (2017). Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines. Design Science, 3.
ChecklandP.B. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1981.
DayR., 2016. Design Error: A Human Factors Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
EricssonA. and SimonH.A. (1993) Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as Data. Cambridge, Mass: Bradford Books, MIT Press.
FuchsC. & OrbristM. (2010). HCI and Society: Towards a Typology of Universal Design Principles. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(6) pp 638–656.
GoldmanN. and NarayanaswamyK. (1992). Software evolution through iterative prototyping. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineering -ICSE ’92.
GruberT. R. (1995). Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? International journal of human-computer studies, 43(5-6), 907–928.
HartsonR. and Partha Pyla (2012). The Ux Book : Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. Morgan Kaufmann Pub.
HoltzblattK., WendellJ. B., & WoodS. (2004). Rapid contextual design: a how-to guide to key techniques for user-centered design. Elsevier.
HinkleD. N. (1965). The change of personal constructs from the viewpoint of a theory of construct implications. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center.
KrippendorffK. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
LeboT., SahooS., McGuinnessD., BelhajjameK., CheneyJ., CorsarD., GarijoD., Soiland-ReyesS., ZednikS. and ZhaoJ., 2013. PROVO: The PROV ontology. W3C recommendation.
LikertR. (1932). "A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes". Archives of Psychology, 140 pp. 1–55.
MaidenN.A.M. & RuggG. (1996). ACRE: a framework for acquisition of requirements. Software Engineering Journal, 11(3) pp. 183–192.
NormanD. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things (revised and expanded edition). The MIT Press, London.
NielsenJ. (2000). Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users. Nielsen Norman Group. Available at: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-onlyneed-to-test-with-5-users/.
OhlssonS. and ReesE. (1991). The Function of Conceptual Understanding in the Learning of Arithmetic Procedures. Cognition and Instruction, 8(2), pp.103–179.
OlsenC. and Mac Namara S.C. (2021). Collaborations in architecture and engineering. London: Routledge.
RuggG. (2018). Pattern matching. hyde and rugg. Available at: https://hydeandrugg.wordpress.com/2018/06/10/pattern-matching/ [Accessed 30 Jun. 2024].
RuggG., RigbyC. & TaylorG. (2018). Craft skills. International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education 6(3/4) pp. 290–304.
RuggG. & McGeorgeP. (1995). Laddering. Expert Systems, 12(4), pp339–346.
RuggG., MartinA., & BrasoveanuM. (2022). Meh, Marmite, Ick and Wow: Using paired feedback scales for liking and disliking. Proceedings of the 35th British HCI and Doctoral Consortium 2022, UK.
ShawM.L.G. and GainesB.R. (1989). Comparing Conceptual Structures: Consensus, Conflict, Correspondence and Contrast. Knowledge Acquisition, 1(4), pp. 341–363.
W3C OWL Working Group (2012), OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview (Second Edition) -W3C Recommendation.

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] ArpR., SmithB., SpearA. D. (2015). Building Ontologies With Basic Formal Ontology. The MIT Press, London.

[2] BalajiS. and MurugaiyanM.S. (2012). Waterfall Vs V-Model Vs Agile: A Comparative Study on SDLC. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management.

[3] BelkinN.J. , OddyR. N. & Brooks (1982) H. M. ASK for Information Retrieval: Part I, Background Theory. Journal of Documentation, 38(2).

[4] BemS.L. (1974), “The measurement of psychological androgyny”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 42 No2, pp. 155–162.

[5] Boehm., B.W. 1988. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer. 21 (5), pp 61–72.

[6] BosW. and TarnaiC. (1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 659–671.

[7] CaneF. (1951). The artist in each of us. London, England. Thames and Hudson.

[8] CamburnB., ViswanathanV., LinseyJ., AndersonD., JensenD., CrawfordR., OttoK. and WoodK. (2017). Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines. Design Science, 3.

[9] ChecklandP.B. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1981.

[10] DayR., 2016. Design Error: A Human Factors Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

[11] EricssonA. and SimonH.A. (1993) Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as Data. Cambridge, Mass: Bradford Books, MIT Press.

[12] FuchsC. & OrbristM. (2010). HCI and Society: Towards a Typology of Universal Design Principles. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(6) pp 638–656.

[13] GoldmanN. and NarayanaswamyK. (1992). Software evolution through iterative prototyping. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineering -ICSE ’92.

[14] GruberT. R. (1995). Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? International journal of human-computer studies, 43(5-6), 907–928.

[15] HartsonR. and Partha Pyla (2012). The Ux Book : Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. Morgan Kaufmann Pub.

[16] HoltzblattK., WendellJ. B., & WoodS. (2004). Rapid contextual design: a how-to guide to key techniques for user-centered design. Elsevier.

[17] HinkleD. N. (1965). The change of personal constructs from the viewpoint of a theory of construct implications. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center.

[18] KrippendorffK. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed. London: Sage.

[19] LeboT., SahooS., McGuinnessD., BelhajjameK., CheneyJ., CorsarD., GarijoD., Soiland-ReyesS., ZednikS. and ZhaoJ., 2013. PROVO: The PROV ontology. W3C recommendation.

[20] LikertR. (1932). "A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes". Archives of Psychology, 140 pp. 1–55.

[21] MaidenN.A.M. & RuggG. (1996). ACRE: a framework for acquisition of requirements. Software Engineering Journal, 11(3) pp. 183–192.

[22] NormanD. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things (revised and expanded edition). The MIT Press, London.

[23] NielsenJ. (2000). Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users. Nielsen Norman Group. Available at: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-onlyneed-to-test-with-5-users/.

[24] OhlssonS. and ReesE. (1991). The Function of Conceptual Understanding in the Learning of Arithmetic Procedures. Cognition and Instruction, 8(2), pp.103–179.

[25] OlsenC. and Mac Namara S.C. (2021). Collaborations in architecture and engineering. London: Routledge.

[26] RuggG. (2018). Pattern matching. hyde and rugg. Available at: https://hydeandrugg.wordpress.com/2018/06/10/pattern-matching/ [Accessed 30 Jun. 2024].

[27] RuggG., RigbyC. & TaylorG. (2018). Craft skills. International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education 6(3/4) pp. 290–304.

[28] RuggG. & McGeorgeP. (1995). Laddering. Expert Systems, 12(4), pp339–346.

[29] RuggG., MartinA., & BrasoveanuM. (2022). Meh, Marmite, Ick and Wow: Using paired feedback scales for liking and disliking. Proceedings of the 35th British HCI and Doctoral Consortium 2022, UK.

[30] ShawM.L.G. and GainesB.R. (1989). Comparing Conceptual Structures: Consensus, Conflict, Correspondence and Contrast. Knowledge Acquisition, 1(4), pp. 341–363.

[31] W3C OWL Working Group (2012), OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview (Second Edition) -W3C Recommendation.

UK Computing Summit 2025: Navigating change (surviving and beyond) - 29-30 April @ Sheffield Hallam University - Register here.

Combining iterative mockup prototyping with paired scales feedback

Contributors

Conference

Affiliations

Article

History

Product

Categories

Comment on this article