114
views
3
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      UK Computing Summit 2025: Navigating change (surviving and beyond) - 29-30 April @ Sheffield Hallam University - Register here.

      scite_
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Smart Citations
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
      View Citations

      See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

      scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Exploring Deceptive Patterns: Insights from Eye Tracking, EMG and Sentiment Analysis

      Published
      proceedings-article
      , ,
      37th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference (BCS HCI 24)
      The International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference in 2024 was supported by the BCS Interactions Special Interest Group and hosted by the University of Central Lancashire in Preston. The BCS HCI Conference welcomed submissions on all aspects of human-computer interaction. Topics included: user experience (UX), usability testing, interaction design (IxD), human-centred AI (HCAI), education, health, sustainability, the Internet of Things (IoT), interaction technologies, and emerging interactive applications.
      15–17 July 2024
      Deceptive Pattern, User experience, Eye tracking, EMG analysis
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2024
            July 2024
            : 213-218
            Affiliations
            [0001]Goldsmiths, University of London

            Computing Department

            London SE146NWUK
            [0002]Testimonium Ltd

            Unit 219, Foundry 78 The Beacon

            Eastbourne, BN21 3NW UK
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2024.20
            a53ac507-a805-423d-b8f0-3a78bf67c4aa
            © Jamalifard et al. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of BCS HCI 2024, UK

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            37th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference
            BCS HCI 24
            37
            University of Central Lancashire (UCLan)
            15–17 July 2024
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            The International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference in 2024 was supported by the BCS Interactions Special Interest Group and hosted by the University of Central Lancashire in Preston. The BCS HCI Conference welcomed submissions on all aspects of human-computer interaction. Topics included: user experience (UX), usability testing, interaction design (IxD), human-centred AI (HCAI), education, health, sustainability, the Internet of Things (IoT), interaction technologies, and emerging interactive applications.
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2024.20
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            Eye tracking,EMG analysis,User experience,Deceptive Pattern

            REFERENCES

            1. BirdS., KleinE., and LoperE. (2009). Natural language processing with Python: analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. ” O’Reilly Media, Inc.”.

            2. BrignullH. (2023). Deceptive patterns: Exposing the tricks tech companies use to control you. (No Title).

            3. CacioppoJ. T., PettyR.E., LoschM.E., and KimH.S. (1986). Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. Journal of personality and social psychology 50(2), 260.

            4. Di GeronimoL., BrazL., FregnanE., PalombaF., and BacchelliA. (2020). Ui dark patterns and where to find them: a study on mobile applications and user perception. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1–14.

            5. GrayC. M., KouY., BattlesB., HoggattJ., and ToombsA.L. (2018). The dark (patterns) side of ux design. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1–14.

            6. HassenzahlM. and SandwegN. (2004). From mental effort to perceived usability: transforming experiences into summary assessments. In CHI’04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1283–1286.

            7. IbarraI. A. (2017). Should we treat data as labor? Moving beyond’free’. SSRN.

            8. KaleS. N. and DudulS.V. (2009). Intelligent noise removal from emg signal using focused timelagged recurrent neural network. Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing 2009(1), 129761.

            9. KellarM., HawkeyK., InkpenK.M., and WattersC. (2008). Challenges of capturing natural webbased user behaviors. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 24(4), 385–409.

            10. LuguriJ. and StrahilevitzL.J. (2021). Shining a light on dark patterns. Journal of Legal Analysis 13(1), 43–109.

            11. Lupi´a˜ nez-VillanuevaF., BoludaA., BogliacinoF., LivaG., LechardoyL., and deT.R. las Heras Ballell (2022). Behavioural study on unfair commercial practices in the digital environment: dark patterns and manipulative personalisation. Publications Office of the European Union.

            12. LvH.-R., Z.-LinL., W.-YinJ., and DongJ. (2008). Emotion recognition based on pressure sensor keyboards. In 2008 IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo, pp. 1089–1092. IEEE.

            13. M. BhootA., ShindeM.A., and MishraW.P. (2020). Towards the identification of dark patterns: An analysis based on end-user reactions. In Proceedings of the 11th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 24–33.

            14. MathurA., AcarG., FriedmanM.J., LucheriniE., MayerJ., ChettyM., and NarayananA. (2019). Dark patterns at scale: Findings from a crawl of 11k shopping websites. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 3(CSCW), 1–32. McCarthyJ. and WrightP. (2004). Technology as experience. interactions 11(5), 42–43.

            15. OuztsA. D. and DuchowskiA.T. (2012). Comparison of eye movement metrics recorded at different sampling rates. In Proceedings of the symposium on eye tracking research and applications, pp. 321–324.

            16. RutkowskaJ. M., GhilardiT., VacaruS.V., vanJ.E. Schaik, MeyerM., HunniusS., and OostenveldR. (2024). Optimal processing of surface facial emg to identify emotional expressions: A data-driven approach. Behavior Research Methods, 1–14.

            17. SchumannN. P., BongersK., GuntinasO.-Lichius, and ScholleH.C. (2010). Facial muscle activation patterns in healthy male humans: A multi-channel surface emg study. Journal of neuroscience methods 187(1), 120–128.

            18. Van BoxtelA. (2001). Optimal signal bandwidth for the recording of surface emg activity of facial, jaw, oral, and neck muscles. Psychophysiology 38(1), 22–34.

            19. ZacA., Y.-HuangC., vonA. Moltke, DeckerC., and EzrachiA. (2023). Dark patterns and online consumer vulnerability. Available at SSRN 4547964.

            Comments

            Comment on this article