For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
45
views
0
references
 Top references
cited by
0
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      0
      similar
       All similar

      UK Computing Summit 2025: Navigating change (surviving and beyond) - 29-30 April @ Sheffield Hallam University - Register here.

      scite_
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Smart Citations
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
      View Citations

      See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

      scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Dozzz: Exploring the Feasibility of a Voice-Based Sleep Diary for Children

      Published
      proceedings-article
      Author(s): , ,
      Publication date (Print):
      Conference name: 37th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference (BCS HCI 24)
      Conference theme: The International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference in 2024 was supported by the BCS Interactions Special Interest Group and hosted by the University of Central Lancashire in Preston. The BCS HCI Conference welcomed submissions on all aspects of human-computer interaction. Topics included: user experience (UX), usability testing, interaction design (IxD), human-centred AI (HCAI), education, health, sustainability, the Internet of Things (IoT), interaction technologies, and emerging interactive applications.
      Conference date: 15–17 July 2024
      Keywords: Voice-user interfaces, conversational interfaces, children, sleepdiary, self-report
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Shanshan Chen
            Panos Markopoulos
            Jun Hu
            Conference
            Publication date: July 2024
            Publication date (Print): July 2024
            Pages: 100-114
            Affiliations
            [0001]Department of Industrial Design

            Eindhoven University of Technology
            Article
            DOI: 10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2024.10
            SO-VID: 3b649fdf-c97e-49b4-8b81-1ae90588e147
            Copyright © © Chen et al. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of BCS HCI 2024, UK
            License:

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            Conference name: 37th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference
            Conference acronym: BCS HCI 24
            Conference number: 37
            Conference location: University of Central Lancashire (UCLan)
            Conference date: 15–17 July 2024
            Conference sponsor: Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Conference theme: The International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference in 2024 was supported by the BCS Interactions Special Interest Group and hosted by the University of Central Lancashire in Preston. The BCS HCI Conference welcomed submissions on all aspects of human-computer interaction. Topics included: user experience (UX), usability testing, interaction design (IxD), human-centred AI (HCAI), education, health, sustainability, the Internet of Things (IoT), interaction technologies, and emerging interactive applications.
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2024.10
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Series title: Electronic Workshops in Computing

            ScienceOpen disciplines: Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            Keywords: self-report,conversational interfaces,sleepdiary,Voice-user interfaces,children

            REFERENCES

            1. AartsT., MarkopoulosP., GilingL., VacaretuT., and PillenS. (2022). Snoozy: a chatbot-based sleep diary for children aged eight to twelve. In Interaction Design and Children, pages 297–307.

            2. AnthonyL. (2019). Physical dimensions of children’s touchscreen interactions: Lessons from five years of study on the mtagic project. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 128(C):1–16.

            3. BarrettM., BerneyT., BhateS., FamuyiwaO., FundudisT., KolvinI., and TyrerS. (1991). Diagnosing childhood depression. who should be interviewed-parent or child?: The newcastle child depression project. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 159(S11):22–27.

            4. BirdH. R., GouldM. S., and StaghezzaB. (1992). Aggregating data from multiple informants in child psychiatry epidemiological research. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31(1):78–85.

            5. BladerJ. C., KoplewiczH. S., AbikoffH., and FoleyC. (1997). Sleep problems of elementary school children: a community survey. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 151(5):473–480.

            6. BrockmannP. E., DiazB., DamianiF., VillarroelL., N´u˜nezF., and BruniO. (2016). Impact of television on the quality of sleep in preschool children. Sleep medicine, 20:140–144.

            7. BrownK. and KennedyH. (2011). Learning through conversation: Exploring and extending teacher and children’s involvement in classroom talk. School Psychology International, 32(4):377–396.

            8. CarneyC. E., BuysseD. J., Ancoli-IsraelS., EdingerJ. D., KrystalA. D., LichsteinK. L., and MorinC.M. (2012). The consensus sleep diary: standardizing prospective sleep self-monitoring. Sleep, 35(2):287–302.

            9. CasasJ., SpringT., DaherK., MugelliniE., KhaledO. A., and Cudr´e-MaurouxP. (2021). Enhancing conversational agents with empathic abilities. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, IVA ’21, page 41–47, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.

            10. ChenS. (2024). Dozzz source code and related documents. https://github.com/Shanshan-css/Dozzz-v2.0.git. Accessed: 2024-06-22.

            11. ChenS., MarkopoulosP., and HuJ. (2023). Dozzz: Exploring voice-based sleep experience sampling for children. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pages 490–500. Springer.

            12. ChenS., MarkopoulosP., and HuJ. (2024). Sustory: Usability evaluation of conversational interfaces for children with a narrative on a game board. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces.

            13. ChervinR. D., DillonJ. E., ArchboldK. H., and RuzickaD.L. (2003). Conduct problems and symptoms of sleep disorders in children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(2):201–208.

            14. ChervinR. D., DillonJ. E., BassettiC., GanoczyD. A., and PituchK.J. (1997). Symptoms of sleep disorders, inattention, and hyperactivity in children. Sleep, 20(12):1185–1192.

            15. ChiongC. and DeLoacheJ.S. (2013). Learning the abcs: What kinds of picture books facilitate young children’s learning? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 13(2):225–241.

            16. ChubbJ., MissaouiS., ConcannonS., MaloneyL., and WalkerJ.A. (2022). Interactive storytelling for children: A case-study of design and development considerations for ethical conversational ai. Int. J. Child-Comp. Interact., 32(C).

            17. ClarkeV. and BraunV. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The psychologist, 26(2):120–123.

            18. Danielle PachecoD.N.V. (2023). Children and sleep-an introduction to the importance of sleep in children and how to help them sleep better.

            19. DrugaS., WilliamsR., BreazealC., and ResnickM. (2017). ”hey google is it ok if i eat you?”: Initial explorations in child-agent interaction. IDC ’17, page 595–600, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.

            20. eric urban, n. (2023). Test accuracy of a custom speech model.

            21. FernaeusY., H˚akanssonM., JacobssonM., and LjungbladS. (2010). How do you play with a robotic toy animal? a long-term study of pleo. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC ’10, page 39–48, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.

            22. FuY., MichelsonR., LinY., NguyenL. K., TayebiT. J., and HinikerA. (2022). Social emotional learning with conversational agents: Reviewing current designs and probing parents’ ideas for future ones. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 6(2).

            23. GargR. and SenguptaS. (2020). He is just like me: a study of the long-term use of smart speakers by parents and children. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 4(1):1–24.

            24. GoodwinC. and HeritageJ. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual review of anthropology, 19(1):283–307.

            25. HaugS., CastroR. P., KwonM., FillerA., KowatschT., and SchaubM.P. (2015). Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in switzerland. Journal of behavioral addictions, 4(4):299–307.

            26. HenryA. D. (2000). Pediatric interest profiles: Surveys of play for children and adolescents, kid play profile, preteen play profile, adolescent leisure interest profile. Psychological Corporation.

            27. HillA. L., DegnanK. A., CalkinsS. D., and KeaneS.P. (2006). Profiles of externalizing behavior problems for boys and girls across preschool: the roles of emotion regulation and inattention. Developmental psychology, 42(5):913.

            28. HourcadeJ. P. (2015). Child-computer interaction. Self, Iowa City, Iowa. Ib ´a˜nezV., SilvaJ., and CauliO. (2018). A survey on sleep questionnaires and diaries. Sleep medicine, 42:90–96.

            29. IngramJ. and ElliottV. (2014). Turn taking and ‘wait time’in classroom interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 62:1–12.

            30. IssenmanR. M. and JafferI.H. (2004). Use of voice recognition software in an outpatient pediatric specialty practice. Pediatrics, 114(3):e290–e293.

            31. IvensC. and RehmL.P. (1988). Assessment of childhood depression: correspondence between reports by child, mother, and father. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(6):738–741.

            32. JungH., KimH. J., SoS., KimJ., and OhC. (2019). Turtletalk: An educational programming game for children with voice user interface. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–6.

            33. KroegerO. and ThuesenJ.M. (2013). Type talk: The 16 personality types that determine how we live, love, and work. Dell.

            34. LewandowskiA. S., WardT. M., and PalermoT.M. (2011). Sleep problems in children and adolescents with common medical conditions. Pediatric Clinics, 58(3):699–713.

            35. LewisJ. R. (2018). The system usability scale: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34:577 – 590.

            36. LoeberR., GreenS. M., LaheyB. B., and Stouthamer-LoeberM. (1989). Optimal informants on childhood disruptive behaviors. Development and Psychopathology, 1(4):317–337.

            37. Lopez-FernandezO., Honrubia-SerranoL., Freixa-BlanxartM., and GibsonW. (2014). Prevalence of problematic mobile phone use in british adolescents. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and social networking, 17(2):91–98.

            38. MallinsonD. C., KamenetskyM. E., HagenE. W., and PeppardP.E. (2019). Subjective sleep measurement: comparing sleep diary to questionnaire. Nature and Science of Sleep, pages 197–206.

            39. MarkopoulosP., ReadJ. C., and GiannakosM. (2021). Design of digital technologies for children. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, pages 1287–1304.

            40. MarkopoulosP., ReadJ. C., MacFarlaneS., and HoysniemiJ. (2008). Evaluating children’s interactive products: principles and practices for interaction designers. Elsevier.

            41. MazzaS., BastujiH., and ReyA.E. (2020). Objective and subjective assessments of sleep in children: comparison of actigraphy, sleep diary completed by children and parents’ estimation. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11:495.

            42. MilesM. B. and HubermanA.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.

            43. MirvisP. H. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience.

            44. OakesL. M., NewcombeN. S., and PlumertJ.M. (2009). Are dynamic systems and connectionist approaches an alternative to “good old fashioned cognitive development”. Toward a new unified theory of development, pages 279–294.

            45. O’ConnellD.C., KowalS., and KaltenbacherE. (1990). Turn-taking: A critical analysis of the research tradition. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 19:345–373.

            46. ParkY., PatwardhanS., RamananK. V., and GatesS.C. (2008). An empirical analysis of word error rate and keyword error rate. In Interspeech.

            47. PinaL., SienS.-W., SongC., WardT. M., FogartyJ., MunsonS. A., and KientzJ.A. (2020). Dreamcatcher: exploring how parents and school-age children can track and review sleep information together. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction, 4(CSCW1):1–25.

            48. PutnamC., PuthenmadomM., CuerdoM. A., WangW., and PaulN. (2020). Adaptation of the system usability scale for user testing with children. In Extended abstracts of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1–7.

            49. RileyA. W. (2004). Evidence that schoolage children can self-report on their health. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 4(4):371–376.

            50. SariC. C. (2020). Conversation analysis: Turntaking mechanism and power relation ij classroom setting. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 7(2):118–136.

            51. SchaeferS. E., Van LoanM., and GermanJ.B. (2014). A feasibility study of wearable activity monitors for pre-adolescent school-age children posted. 11(130262).

            52. SchneiderW. (2010). Memory development in childhood. The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development, pages 347–376.

            53. ShortM. A., GradisarM., LackL. C., WrightH., and CarskadonM.A. (2012). The discrepancy between actigraphic and sleep diary measures of sleep in adolescents. Sleep medicine, 13(4):378–384.

            54. SivertsenB., HysingM., ElgenI., StormarkK. M., and LundervoldA.J. (2009). Chronicity of sleep problems in children with chronic illness: a longitudinal population-based study. Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 3:1–7.

            55. SpitaleM., SilleresiS., CosentinoG., PanzeriF., and GarzottoF. (2020). ” whom would you like to talk with?” exploring conversational agents for children’s linguistic assessment. In Proceedings of the interaction design and children conference, pages 262–272.

            56. SteinM. A., MendelsohnJ., ObermeyerW. H., AmrominJ., and BencaR. (2001). Sleep and behavior problems in school-aged children. Pediatrics, 107(4):e60–e60.

            57. SturgessJ., RodgerS., and OzanneA. (2002). A review of the use of self-report assessment with young children. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(3):108–116.

            58. TewariA. and CannyJ. (2014). What did spot hide? a question-answering game for preschool children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1807–1816.

            59. Tudor CarL., DhinagaranD. A., KyawB. M., KowatschT., JotyS., ThengY.-L., and AtunR. (2020). Conversational agents in health care: scoping review and conceptual analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(8):e17158.

            60. V˘ac˘ aret,uT., BatalasN., Erten-UyumazB., Van GilstM., OvereemS., and MarkopoulosP. (2019). Subjective sleep quality monitoring with the hypnos digital sleep diary: Evaluation of usability and user experience. In Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, pages 113–122.

            61. van ItersonH.C., MarkopoulosP., and GerritsenL.E. (2023). Motivating children’s engagement withnbsp;sleep diaries through storytelling. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023: 19th IFIP TC13 International Conference, York, UK, August 28 – September 1, 2023, Proceedings, Part II, page 214–223, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag.

            62. van RijssenI.M., HulstR. Y., GorterJ. W., GerritsenA., Visser-MeilyJ.M.A., DudinkJ., VoormanJ. M., PillenS., and VerschurenO. (2023). Device-based and subjective measurements of sleep in children with cerebral palsy: A comparison of sleep diary, actigraphy, and bed sensor data. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 19(1):35–43. VanceM., StackhouseJ., and WellsB. (2005). Speech-production skills in children aged 3–7 years. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 40(1):29–48.

            63. VirziR. A. (1992). Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects is enough? Human factors, 34(4):457–468.

            64. WiggsL. and StoresG. (1996). Severe sleep disturbance and daytime challenging behaviour in children with severe learning disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 40(6):518–528.

            65. WinstoneN. E., NashR. A., ParkerM., and RowntreeJ. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational psychologist, 52(1):17–37.

            66. XuY., WangD., CollinsP., LeeH., and WarschauerM. (2021). Same benefits, different communication patterns: Comparing children’s reading with a conversational agent vs. a human partner. Computers & Education, 161:104059.

            67. XuY. and WarschauerM. (2020). Exploring young children’s engagement in joint reading with a conversational agent. In Proceedings of the interaction design and children conference, pages 216–228.

            68. YaroshS., ThompsonS., WatsonK., ChaseA., SenthilkumarA., YuanY., and BrushA.J.B. (2018). Children asking questions: Speech interface reformulations and personification preferences. IDC ’18, page 300–312, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.

            Comments

            Comment on this article