Challenges and Design Considerations for Home-based Visualisations to Encourage More Sustainable Practices

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Header Abstract Content Author and article information REFERENCES Comments

Record: found
Abstract: found
Conference Proceedings: found

Is Open Access

Challenges and Design Considerations for Home-based Visualisations to Encourage More Sustainable Practices

Published

proceedings-article

Author(s): Dushani Perera , Nervo Verdezoto Dias , Julie Gwilliam , Parisa Eslambolchilar

Publication date (Print): August 2023

Conference name: 36th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference (BCS HCI 23)

Conference theme: The BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference 2023 was co-located with the INTERACT 2023 conference, the theme of which was "Design for Equlity and Justice", as increasingly, computer science as a discipline is becoming concerned about issues of justice and equality – from fake news to rights for robots, from the ethics of driverless vehicles to the gamergate controversy. The BCS HCI Conference welcomed submissions on all aspects of human-computer interaction. Topics included: User Experience, usability testing and interaction design; Education and Health; Smart Energy, Smart Transport and the Internet of Things; Interaction Technologies and Applications.

Conference date: 28–29 August 2023

Keywords: Data Physicalisation, Climate Change Communication, Sustainable HCI

Bookmark

Abstract

Content

Author and article information

Contributors

Dushani Perera

Nervo Verdezoto Dias

Julie Gwilliam

Parisa Eslambolchilar

Conference

Publication date: August 2023

Publication date (Print): August 2023

Pages: 228-237

Affiliations

[0001]Cardiff University, UK

Article

DOI: 10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2023.26

SO-VID: 57a68966-4ac9-4704-9181-6be1cf8a34fb

License:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Conference name: 36th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference

Conference acronym: BCS HCI 23

Conference number: 36

Conference location: University of York, UK

Conference date: 28–29 August 2023

Conference sponsor: Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)

History

Product

1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2023.26

Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/

REFERENCES

W. Abrahamse, S. D. Darby, and K. McComas. How to communicate energy and environment with energy consumers?, 2018.
P. Allmark. Should research samples reflect the diversity of the population? Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(2):185–189, 2004. ISSN 0306-6800. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.004374. URL https://jme.bmj.com/content/30/2/185.
S. Antifakos and B. Schiele. Laughinglily: Using a flower as a real world information display. 2003.
S. Backlund, M. Gyllenswärd, A. Gustafsson, S. Ilstedt, R. Mazé, and J. Redström. Static! the aesthetics of energy in everyday things. 10 2006.
L. Baillie and D. Benyon. Place and technology in the home. Comput. Supported Coop. Work, 17(2–3):227–256, apr 2008. ISSN 0925-9724. doi: 10.1007/s10606-007-9063-2. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-007-9063-2.
M. Barreto, D. Casado-Mansilla, A. Esteves, and F. Magno de Gouveia Quintal. Designing smart plugs for interactivity and energy sustainability via a survey and thematic analysis. In Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference, NordiCHI ’22, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450396998. doi: 10.1145/3546155.3546681. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3546155.3546681.
L. Bartram. Design challenges and opportunities for eco-feedback in the home. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 35(4):52–62, 2015. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2015.69.
L. Bartram, J. Rodgers, and K. Muise. Chasing the negawatt: Visualization for sustainable living. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 30:8–14, 05 2010. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2010.50.
L. Bartram, J. Rodgers, and R. Woodbury. Smart homes or smart occupants? supporting aware living in the home. pages 52–64, 09 2011. ISBN 978-3-642-23770-6. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23771-3 5.
V. Bettas. Female betta colors, April 2018. URL https://iqss.eu/Female/female-betta-colors.
L.-R. Bloch and D. Lemish. Disposable love: The rise and fall of a virtual pet. New Media & Society, 1(3):283–303, 1999. doi: 10.1177/14614449922225591. URL https://doi.org/10.1177/14614449922225591.
V. Braun and V. Clarke. One size fits all? what counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3):328–352, 2021. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
K. Caine. Local standards for sample size at chi. pages 981–992, 05 2016. doi: 10.1145/2858036.2858498.
S. De Dominicis, R. Sokoloski, C. Jaeger, and P. Schultz. Making the smart meter social promotes long-term energy conservation. Palgrave Communications, 5:51, 05 2019. doi: 10.1057/s41599-019-0254-5.
D. Degraen, H. Hock, M. Schubhan, M. Altmeyer, F. Kosmalla, and A. Krüger. Familyflower: An artifical flower to foster distant family connections. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, MUM ’21, page 204–207, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450386432. doi: 10.1145/3490632.3497833. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3490632.3497833.
T. Dillahunt, O. Lyra, M. Barreto, and E. Karapanos. Reducing children’s psychological distance from climate change via eco-feedback technologies. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 13, 05 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.05.002.
P. Dragicevic, Y. Jansen, and A. Vande Moere. Data Physicalization, page in press. 04 2019. ISBN 978-3-319-73228-2.
A. Druckman and T. Jackson. An exploration into the carbon footprint of uk households. 2010.
P. Eslambolchilar, K. Stawarz, N. Verdezoto Dias, M. A. McNarry, S. G. Crossley, Z. Knowles, and K. A. Mackintosh. Tangible data visualization of physical activity for children and adolescents: A qualitative study of temporal transition of experiences. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 35: 100565, 2023. ISSN 2212-8689. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.100565. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212868923000028.
O. Fernando, A. Cheok, and T. Merritt. Babbage cabbage: Empathetic biological media. Vric’09, pages 20–23, 01 2009.
M. Ferreira, M. Coelho, V. Nisi, and N. Jardim Nunes. Climate change communication in hci: A visual analysis of the past decade. In Creativity and Cognition, C&C ’21, New York, NY, USA, 2021. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450383769. doi: 10.1145/3450741.3466774. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3466774.
D. Fredericks, S. Woolley, and Z. Fan. Visualising the invisible: Augmented reality and virtual reality as persuasive technologies for energy feedback. 08 2019. doi: 10.1109/SmartWorld-UIC-ATCSCALCOM-IOP-SCI.2019.00225.
J. Goodhew, S. Pahl, T. Auburn, and S. Goodhew. Making heat visible. Environment and Behavior, 47, 09 2014. doi: 10.1177/0013916514546218.
T. Guardian. Smart meters: an energy-saving revolution or just plain dumb?, October 2016. URL https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/oct/01/smart-meter-energy-saving-revolution-cut-bills-gas-electricity.
J.-k. Hong, S. Song, J. Cho, and A. Bianchi. Better posture awareness through flower-shaped ambient avatar. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, TEI ’15, page 337–340, New York, NY, USA, 2015. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450333054. doi: 10.1145/2677199.2680575. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680575.
S. Houben, C. Golsteijn, S. Gallacher, R. Johnson, S. Bakker, N. Marquardt, L. Capra, and Y. Rogers. Physikit: Data engagement through physical ambient visualizations in the home. pages 1608–1619, 05 2016. doi: 10.1145/2858036.2858059.
C. Iribagiza, T. Sharpe, D. Wilson, and E. Thomas. User-centered design of an air quality feedback technology to promote adoption of clean cookstoves. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 30, 11 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41370-020-0250-2.
D. Jáuregui and N. Couture. Tacsel: Shape-changing tactile screen applied for eyes-free interaction in cockpit. 09 2019.
C. Katzeff, S. Wessman, and S. Colombo. “Mama, It’s Peacetime!”: Planning, Shifting, and Designing Activities in the Smart Grid Scenario. 10 2017. ISBN 978-953-51-3587-6. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.71129.
J. Kim, S. Ananthanarayan, and T. Yeh. Seen music: Ambient music data visualization for children with hearing impairments. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC ’15, page 426–429, New York, NY, USA, 2015. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450335904. doi: 10.1145/2771839.2771870. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771870.
M. Laschke, S. Diefenbach, and M. Hassenzahl. “annoying, but in a nice way”: An inquiry into the experience of frictional feedback. International Journal of Design, 9:129–140, 09 2015.
Y.-k. Lim, E. Stolterman, and J. Tenenberg. The anatomy of prototypes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15:1–27, 07 2008. doi: 10.1145/1375761.1375762.
E. Locke and G. Latham. A theory of goal setting & task performance. The Academy of Management Review, 16, 04 1991. doi: 10.2307/258875.
ONS. Income estimates for small areas, england and wales financial year ending 2018, 2019. URL https://www.ons.gov.uk/census.
D. Perera, N. Verdezoto Dias, J. Gwilliam, and P. Eslambolchilar. Understanding household consumption practices and their motivations: Opportunities to foster sustainability practices. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS ’23), COMPASS ’23, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3588001.3609360. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3588001.3609360.
J. Pierce, W. Odom, and E. Blevis. Energy aware dwelling: a critical survey of interaction design for eco-visualizations. pages 1–8, 01 2008. doi: 10.1145/1517744.1517746.
F. Quintal, M. Barreto, N. Nunes, V. Nisi, and L. Pereira. Wattsburning on my mailbox: A tangible art inspired eco-feedback visualization for sharing energy consumption. volume 8120, 09 2013. ISBN 9783642404979. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40498-6 10.
M. K. Rasmussen, E. W. Pedersen, M. G. Petersen, and K. Hornbæk. Shape-changing interfaces: A review of the design space and open research questions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’12, page 735–744, New York, NY, USA, 2012. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450310154. doi: 10.1145/2207676.2207781. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207781.
Y. Rogers, W. R. Hazlewood, P. Marshall, N. Dalton, and S. Hertrich. Ambient influence: Can twinkly lights lure and abstract representations trigger behavioral change? In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp ’10, page 261–270, New York, NY, USA, 2010. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781605588438. doi: 10.1145/1864349.1864372. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/1864349.1864372.
K. Sauvé, S. Bakker, and S. Houben. Econundrum: Visualizing the climate impact of dietary choice through a shared data sculpture. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS ’20, page 1287–1300, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450369749. doi: 10.1145/3357236.3395509. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395509.
A. D. Starke, M. C. Willemsen, and C. C. Snijders. Beyond “one-size-fits-all” platforms: Applying campbell’s paradigm to test personalized energy advice in the netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science, 59: 101311, 2020. ISSN 2214-6296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101311. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629618302615.
L. Steg. Promoting household energy conservation. Energy Policy, 36:4449–4453, 12 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.027.
B. Stegers, K. Sauvé, and S. Houben. Ecorbis: A data sculpture of environmental behavior in the home context. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS ’22, page 1669–1683, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450393584. doi: 10.1145/3532106.3533508. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533508.
U. N. E. P. UNEP. Emissions Gap Report 2020. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and UNEP DTU Partnership (UDP)., United Nations Environment Programme, P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya., 2020. ISBN 978-92-807-3812-4. URL https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2020.
W. Willemsen, J. Hu, G. Niezen, and B. Vlist. Using game elements to motivate environmentally responsible behaviour. 01 2011.
S. H. Yoon, Y. K. Lee, T. J. Nam, and K. P. Lee. Laughter blossom: A prototype of laughter interaction design. In 5th International Congress of International Association of Societies of Design Research Proceedings, 2013.

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] W. Abrahamse, S. D. Darby, and K. McComas. How to communicate energy and environment with energy consumers?, 2018.

[2] P. Allmark. Should research samples reflect the diversity of the population? Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(2):185–189, 2004. ISSN 0306-6800. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.004374. URL https://jme.bmj.com/content/30/2/185.

[3] S. Antifakos and B. Schiele. Laughinglily: Using a flower as a real world information display. 2003.

[4] S. Backlund, M. Gyllenswärd, A. Gustafsson, S. Ilstedt, R. Mazé, and J. Redström. Static! the aesthetics of energy in everyday things. 10 2006.

[5] L. Baillie and D. Benyon. Place and technology in the home. Comput. Supported Coop. Work, 17(2–3):227–256, apr 2008. ISSN 0925-9724. doi: 10.1007/s10606-007-9063-2. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-007-9063-2.

[6] M. Barreto, D. Casado-Mansilla, A. Esteves, and F. Magno de Gouveia Quintal. Designing smart plugs for interactivity and energy sustainability via a survey and thematic analysis. In Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference, NordiCHI ’22, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450396998. doi: 10.1145/3546155.3546681. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3546155.3546681.

[7] L. Bartram. Design challenges and opportunities for eco-feedback in the home. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 35(4):52–62, 2015. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2015.69.

[8] L. Bartram, J. Rodgers, and K. Muise. Chasing the negawatt: Visualization for sustainable living. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 30:8–14, 05 2010. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2010.50.

[9] L. Bartram, J. Rodgers, and R. Woodbury. Smart homes or smart occupants? supporting aware living in the home. pages 52–64, 09 2011. ISBN 978-3-642-23770-6. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23771-3 5.

[10] V. Bettas. Female betta colors, April 2018. URL https://iqss.eu/Female/female-betta-colors.

[11] L.-R. Bloch and D. Lemish. Disposable love: The rise and fall of a virtual pet. New Media & Society, 1(3):283–303, 1999. doi: 10.1177/14614449922225591. URL https://doi.org/10.1177/14614449922225591.

[12] V. Braun and V. Clarke. One size fits all? what counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3):328–352, 2021. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.

[13] K. Caine. Local standards for sample size at chi. pages 981–992, 05 2016. doi: 10.1145/2858036.2858498.

[14] S. De Dominicis, R. Sokoloski, C. Jaeger, and P. Schultz. Making the smart meter social promotes long-term energy conservation. Palgrave Communications, 5:51, 05 2019. doi: 10.1057/s41599-019-0254-5.

[15] D. Degraen, H. Hock, M. Schubhan, M. Altmeyer, F. Kosmalla, and A. Krüger. Familyflower: An artifical flower to foster distant family connections. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, MUM ’21, page 204–207, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450386432. doi: 10.1145/3490632.3497833. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3490632.3497833.

[16] T. Dillahunt, O. Lyra, M. Barreto, and E. Karapanos. Reducing children’s psychological distance from climate change via eco-feedback technologies. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 13, 05 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.05.002.

[17] P. Dragicevic, Y. Jansen, and A. Vande Moere. Data Physicalization, page in press. 04 2019. ISBN 978-3-319-73228-2.

[18] A. Druckman and T. Jackson. An exploration into the carbon footprint of uk households. 2010.

[19] P. Eslambolchilar, K. Stawarz, N. Verdezoto Dias, M. A. McNarry, S. G. Crossley, Z. Knowles, and K. A. Mackintosh. Tangible data visualization of physical activity for children and adolescents: A qualitative study of temporal transition of experiences. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 35: 100565, 2023. ISSN 2212-8689. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.100565. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212868923000028.

[20] O. Fernando, A. Cheok, and T. Merritt. Babbage cabbage: Empathetic biological media. Vric’09, pages 20–23, 01 2009.

[21] M. Ferreira, M. Coelho, V. Nisi, and N. Jardim Nunes. Climate change communication in hci: A visual analysis of the past decade. In Creativity and Cognition, C&C ’21, New York, NY, USA, 2021. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450383769. doi: 10.1145/3450741.3466774. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3466774.

[22] D. Fredericks, S. Woolley, and Z. Fan. Visualising the invisible: Augmented reality and virtual reality as persuasive technologies for energy feedback. 08 2019. doi: 10.1109/SmartWorld-UIC-ATCSCALCOM-IOP-SCI.2019.00225.

[23] J. Goodhew, S. Pahl, T. Auburn, and S. Goodhew. Making heat visible. Environment and Behavior, 47, 09 2014. doi: 10.1177/0013916514546218.

[24] T. Guardian. Smart meters: an energy-saving revolution or just plain dumb?, October 2016. URL https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/oct/01/smart-meter-energy-saving-revolution-cut-bills-gas-electricity.

[25] J.-k. Hong, S. Song, J. Cho, and A. Bianchi. Better posture awareness through flower-shaped ambient avatar. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, TEI ’15, page 337–340, New York, NY, USA, 2015. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450333054. doi: 10.1145/2677199.2680575. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680575.

[26] S. Houben, C. Golsteijn, S. Gallacher, R. Johnson, S. Bakker, N. Marquardt, L. Capra, and Y. Rogers. Physikit: Data engagement through physical ambient visualizations in the home. pages 1608–1619, 05 2016. doi: 10.1145/2858036.2858059.

[27] C. Iribagiza, T. Sharpe, D. Wilson, and E. Thomas. User-centered design of an air quality feedback technology to promote adoption of clean cookstoves. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 30, 11 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41370-020-0250-2.

[28] D. Jáuregui and N. Couture. Tacsel: Shape-changing tactile screen applied for eyes-free interaction in cockpit. 09 2019.

[29] C. Katzeff, S. Wessman, and S. Colombo. “Mama, It’s Peacetime!”: Planning, Shifting, and Designing Activities in the Smart Grid Scenario. 10 2017. ISBN 978-953-51-3587-6. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.71129.

[30] J. Kim, S. Ananthanarayan, and T. Yeh. Seen music: Ambient music data visualization for children with hearing impairments. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC ’15, page 426–429, New York, NY, USA, 2015. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450335904. doi: 10.1145/2771839.2771870. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771870.

[31] M. Laschke, S. Diefenbach, and M. Hassenzahl. “annoying, but in a nice way”: An inquiry into the experience of frictional feedback. International Journal of Design, 9:129–140, 09 2015.

[32] Y.-k. Lim, E. Stolterman, and J. Tenenberg. The anatomy of prototypes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15:1–27, 07 2008. doi: 10.1145/1375761.1375762.

[33] E. Locke and G. Latham. A theory of goal setting & task performance. The Academy of Management Review, 16, 04 1991. doi: 10.2307/258875.

[34] ONS. Income estimates for small areas, england and wales financial year ending 2018, 2019. URL https://www.ons.gov.uk/census.

[35] D. Perera, N. Verdezoto Dias, J. Gwilliam, and P. Eslambolchilar. Understanding household consumption practices and their motivations: Opportunities to foster sustainability practices. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS ’23), COMPASS ’23, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3588001.3609360. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3588001.3609360.

[36] J. Pierce, W. Odom, and E. Blevis. Energy aware dwelling: a critical survey of interaction design for eco-visualizations. pages 1–8, 01 2008. doi: 10.1145/1517744.1517746.

[37] F. Quintal, M. Barreto, N. Nunes, V. Nisi, and L. Pereira. Wattsburning on my mailbox: A tangible art inspired eco-feedback visualization for sharing energy consumption. volume 8120, 09 2013. ISBN 9783642404979. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40498-6 10.

[38] M. K. Rasmussen, E. W. Pedersen, M. G. Petersen, and K. Hornbæk. Shape-changing interfaces: A review of the design space and open research questions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’12, page 735–744, New York, NY, USA, 2012. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450310154. doi: 10.1145/2207676.2207781. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207781.

[39] Y. Rogers, W. R. Hazlewood, P. Marshall, N. Dalton, and S. Hertrich. Ambient influence: Can twinkly lights lure and abstract representations trigger behavioral change? In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp ’10, page 261–270, New York, NY, USA, 2010. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781605588438. doi: 10.1145/1864349.1864372. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/1864349.1864372.

[40] K. Sauvé, S. Bakker, and S. Houben. Econundrum: Visualizing the climate impact of dietary choice through a shared data sculpture. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS ’20, page 1287–1300, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450369749. doi: 10.1145/3357236.3395509. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395509.

[41] A. D. Starke, M. C. Willemsen, and C. C. Snijders. Beyond “one-size-fits-all” platforms: Applying campbell’s paradigm to test personalized energy advice in the netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science, 59: 101311, 2020. ISSN 2214-6296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101311. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629618302615.

[42] L. Steg. Promoting household energy conservation. Energy Policy, 36:4449–4453, 12 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.027.

[43] B. Stegers, K. Sauvé, and S. Houben. Ecorbis: A data sculpture of environmental behavior in the home context. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS ’22, page 1669–1683, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450393584. doi: 10.1145/3532106.3533508. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533508.

[44] U. N. E. P. UNEP. Emissions Gap Report 2020. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and UNEP DTU Partnership (UDP)., United Nations Environment Programme, P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya., 2020. ISBN 978-92-807-3812-4. URL https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2020.

[45] W. Willemsen, J. Hu, G. Niezen, and B. Vlist. Using game elements to motivate environmentally responsible behaviour. 01 2011.

[46] S. H. Yoon, Y. K. Lee, T. J. Nam, and K. P. Lee. Laughter blossom: A prototype of laughter interaction design. In 5th International Congress of International Association of Societies of Design Research Proceedings, 2013.

UK Computing Summit 2025: Navigating change (surviving and beyond) - 29-30 April @ Sheffield Hallam University - Register here.

Challenges and Design Considerations for Home-based Visualisations to Encourage More Sustainable Practices

Contributors

Conference

Affiliations

Article

History

Product

Categories

Comment on this article