Smart CitationsSee how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
- Record: found
- Abstract: found
- Conference Proceedings: found
Evaluating Graphical User Interfaces for Handling Latency in Remote Crane Operation
Content
Author and article information
REFERENCES
Bejczy, A., W. Kim, and S. Venema (1990). The phantom robot: predictive displays for teleoperation with time delay. In Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 546–551 vol.1. IEEE.
Bidwell, J., A. Holloway, and S. Davidoff (2014). Measuring operator anticipatory inputs in response to time-delay for teleoperated human-robot interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’14, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1467–1470. ACM.
Brunnström, K., E. Dima, M. Andersson, M. Sjöström, T. Qureshi, and M. Johanson (2019). Quality of experience of hand controller latency in a virtual reality simulator. Electronic Imaging 2019(12), 218:1–218:9.
Chen, J. Y. C., E. C. Haas, and M. J. Barnes (2007). Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 37(6), 1231–1245.
Chen, L., G.-C. Chen, H. Chen, J. March, S. Benford, and Z.-G. Pan (2007). An hci method to improve the human performance reduced by local-lag mechanism. Interacting with Computers 19(2), 215–224.
Fahl én, T., M. Drobnjak, J. Finn, I. Hutchings, V. Jakovljevic, R. Nilsson, J. Oyola, and M. Savic (2022). Graphical port simulator. Technical report, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden. Unpublished.
Fraser, M., T. Glover, I. Vaghi, S. Benford, C. Greenhalgh, J. Hindmarsh, and C. Heath (2000). Revealing the realities of collaborative virtual reality. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments, CVE ’00, New York, NY, USA, pp. 29–37. Association for Computing Machinery.
Gutwin, C., S. Benford, J. Dyck, M. Fraser, I. Vaghi, and C. Greenhalgh (2004). Revealing delay in collaborative environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’04, New York, NY, USA, pp. 503–510. ACM.
He, F., S. K. Ong, and A. Y. C. Nee (2021). An integrated mobile augmented reality digital twin monitoring system. Computers 10(8), 99.
Karvonen, H., H. Koskinen, and J. Haggr én (2012). Enhancing the user experience of the crane operator: Comparing work demands in two operational settings. In Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, ECCE ’12, New York, NY, USA, pp. 37–44. ACM.
Koskinen, H., H. Karvonen, and H. Tokkonen (2013). User experience targets as design drivers: A case study on the development of a remote crane operator station. In Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, ECCE ’13, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Lewis, J. R. (2018). The system usability scale: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 34(7), 577–590.
Liu, S., X. Xu, and M. Claypool (2022). A survey and taxonomy of latency compensation techniques for network computer games. ACM Computing Surveys 54(11s), 1–34.
Luck, J. P., P. L. McDermott, L. Allender, and D. C. Russell (2006). An investigation of real world control of robotic assets under communication latency. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’06, New York, NY, USA, pp. 202–209. ACM.
Major, P., G. Li, H. Zhang, and H. P. Hildre (2021). Real-time digital twin of research vessel for remote monitoring. In Proceedings of the 35th European Council for Modeling and Simulation. ECMS.
Matheson, A., B. Donmez, F. Rehmatullah, P. Jasiobedzki, H.-K. Ng, V. Panwar, and M. Li (2013). The effects of predictive displays on performance in driving tasks with multi-second latency: Aiding tele-operation of lunar rovers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 57(1), 21–25.
Neumeier, S., P. Wintersberger, A.-K. Frison, A. Becher, C. Facchi, and A. Riener (2019). Teleoperation: The holy grail to solve problems of automated driving? Sure, but latency matters. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI ’19, New York, NY, USA, pp. 186–197. ACM.
Shirmohammadi, S., N. Woo, and S. Alavi (2005). Network lag mitigation methods in collaborative distributed simulations. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems, 2005., pp. 244–250.
Sitompul, T. A. (2022a). Human–machine interface for remote crane operation: A review. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 6(6), 45.
Sitompul, T. A. (2022b). The impacts of different work locations and levels of automation on crane operators’ experiences: A study in a container terminal in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, OzCHI ’22, New York, NY, USA, pp. 193–198. ACM.
Vaughan, J. and W. Singhose (2014). The influence of time delay on crane operator performance. In T. Vyhlídal, J.-F. Lafay, and R. Sipahi (Eds.), Delay Systems: From Theory to Numerics and Applications, pp. 329–342. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Villaverde, A. F., C. Raimúndez, and A. Barreiro (2012). Passive internet-based crane teleoperation with haptic aids. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems 10, 78–87.
Wilde, M., M. Chan, and B. Kish (2020). Predictive human-machine interface for teleoperation of air and space vehicles over time delay. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–14. IEEE.