Smart CitationsSee how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
- Record: found
- Abstract: found
- Conference Proceedings: found
Reflexivity, Interactions and Intersectionality in HCI and CSCW
Content
Author and article information
REFERENCES
Ahmed, A. and Irani, L. (2020), ‘Feminism as a design methodology’, interactions 27(6), 42–45.
Akel, S. (2019), ‘Insider-Outsider: The Role of Race in Shaping the Experiences of Black and Minority Ethnic Students’. URL: https://www.gold.ac.uk/media/docs/reports/Insider-Outsider-Report-191008.pdf
Ashcroft, A. (2020), ‘Hedging and gender in participatory design’, International Conferences Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction 2020.
Ashcroft, A. (2021), ‘Do I belong here? An exploration of meeting structure and language, alongside gender and a sense of belonging.’, OzCHI ’21, November 30-December 2, 2021, Melbourne, VIC, Australia .
Ashcroft, A. (2022), I think ”hedging” could be a feminist issue in software engineering, Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: The International Venue on Practice-centred Computing on the Design of Cooperation Technologies - Exploratory Papers, Reports of the European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies.
Barbour, K. (2018), Embodied Ways of Knowing: Revisiting Feminist Epistemology, Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp. 209–226. URL: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53318-014
Bardzell, S. (2010), Feminist hci: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design, in ‘Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems’, pp. 1301–1310.
Bardzell, S. and Bardzell, J. (2011), Towards a feminist hci methodology: social science, feminism, and hci, in ‘Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems’, pp. 675–684.
Barkhuus, L. and Rode, J. A. (2007), From mice to men-24 years of evaluation in chi, in ‘Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems’, Vol. 10, ACM New York, NY.
Bellini, R., Meissner, J., Finnigan, S. M. and Strohmayer, A. (2022), ‘Feminist human–computer interaction: Struggles for past, contemporary and futuristic feminist theories in digital innovation’, Feminist Theory 23(2), 143–149.
Brewer, J. (2022), Playing unbound: Towards a radically intersectional hci, in ‘Extended Abstracts of the 2022 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play’, pp. 270–272.
Caine, K. (2016), Local standards for sample size at chi, in ‘Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems’, pp. 981–992.
Chen, K.-L., Clarke, R., Almeida, T., Wood, M. and Kirk, D. S. (2017), Situated dissemination through an hci workplace, in ‘Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems’, pp. 2078–2090.
Christoffersen, A. (2018), ‘Researching intersectionality: Ethical issues: Jo campling essay prize, postgraduate winner, 2018’, Ethics and Social Welfare 12(4), 414–421.
Cooper, G. and Bowers, J. (1995), ‘Representing the user: Notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human-computer’, The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces p. 48.
Crabtree, A., Tolmie, P. and Rouncefield, M. (2013), “How Many Bloody Examples Do You Want?” Fieldwork and Generalisation, in ‘ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 21-25 September 2013, Paphos, Cyprus’.
Davis, K. (2008), ‘Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful’, Feminist theory 9(1), 67–85.
De Hertogh, L. B., Lane, L. and Ouellette, J. (2019), ‘“Feminist Leanings:” Tracing Technofeminist and Intersectional Practices and Values in Three Decades of Computers and Composition’, Computers and Composition (51), 4–13.
Eddo-Lodge, R. (2020), Why I’m no longer talking to white people about race, Bloomsbury Publishing.
Erete, S., Rankin, Y. A. and Thomas, J. O. (2021), ‘I can’t breathe: Reflections from black women in cscw and hci’, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4(CSCW3), 1–23.
Erete, S., Rankin, Y. and Thomas, J. (2023), ‘A method to the madness: Applying an intersectional analysis of structural oppression and power in hci and design’, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 30(2), 1–45.
Flax, J. (1993), ‘Disputed subjects: Essays on psychoanalysis, politics, and philosophy’.
Fox, S., Menking, A., Steinhardt, S., Hoffmann, A. L. and Bardzell, S. (2017), Imagining intersectional futures: Feminist approaches in cscw, in ‘Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing’, pp. 387–393.
Fuller, K. (2020), The “7 up” intersectionality life grid: A tool for reflexive practice, in ‘Frontiers in Education’, Vol. 5, Frontiers, p. 77.
Hacking, I., Hacking, J. et al. (1999), The social construction of what?, Harvard University Press.
Haimson, O. L., Gorrell, D., Starks, D. L. and Weinger, Z. (2020), Designing trans technology: Defining challenges and envisioning communitycentered solutions, in ‘Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems’, pp. 1–13.
Hancox-Li, L. and Kumar, I. E. (2021), Epistemic values in feature importance methods: Lessons from feminist epistemology, in ‘Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency’, FAccT ’21, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, p. 817–826. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445943
Harding, S. G. (2004), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies, Psychology Press.
Henriques, A. O., Rafael, S., Almeida, V. M. and Pinto, J. G. (2023), The problem with genderblind design and how we might begin to address it: A model for intersectional feminist ethical deliberation, in ‘Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems’, pp. 1–12.
Holmes, J. (1986), ‘Functions of You Know in Women’s and Men’s Speech Language in Society’, Source: Language in Society.
Locke, K. (2015), ‘Intersectionality and reflexivity in gender research: disruptions, tracing lines and shooting arrows’, International Studies in Sociology of Education 25(3), 169–182.
Longino, H. E. (1994), ‘In search of feminist epistemology’, The Monist 77(4), 472–485. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27903405
Marsden, N., Hermann, J. and Pröbster, M. (2017), Developing personas, considering gender: A case study, in ‘ACM International Conference Proceeding Series’.
May, T. (1999), ‘Reflexivity and sociological practice’, Sociological Research Online 4(3), 184–192.
May, T., Perry, B. et al. (2014), ‘Reflexivity and the practice of qualitative research’, The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis 109, 109–122.
Mooney, C. and Becker, B. A. (2020), Sense of belonging: The intersectionality of self-identified minority status and gender in undergraduate computer science students, in ‘United Kingdom & Ireland Computing Education Research Conference.’, UKICER ’20, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, p. 24–30. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3416465.3416476
Morris, M. and Bunjun, B. (2007), Using intersectional feminist frameworks in research.
Morris, M. R., Begel, A. and Wiedermann, B. (2015), Understanding the challenges faced by neurodiverse software engineering employees: Towards a more inclusive and productive technical workforce, in ‘Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on computers & accessibility’, pp. 173–184.
Offenwanger, A., Milligan, A. J., Chang, M., Bullard, J. and Yoon, D. (2021), Diagnosing bias in the gender representation of hci research participants: How it happens and where we are, in ‘Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems’, CHI ’21, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445383
Pernecky, T. (2016), ‘Social Ontology’, Epistemology and Metaphysics for Qualitative Research pp. 139–162.
Rankin, Y. A. and Thomas, J. O. (2019), ‘Straighten up and fly right: Rethinking intersectionality in hci research’, Interactions 26(6), 64–68.
Saad, L. (2020), Me and White Supremacy, 1st edn, Quercus Publishing.
Sacks, H. (1992), ‘Lectures on conversation: Volume i’, Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Schlesinger, A., Edwards, W. K. and Grinter, R. E. (2017), Intersectional HCI.
Sharrock,W. L. and Randall, D. (2004), Ethnography, ethnomethodology and the problem of generalisation in design, in ‘European Journal of Information Systems’.
Slack, R. (2000), ‘Reflexivity or sociological practice: A reply to may’, Sociological Research Online 5(1), 27–31.
Spiel, K., Keyes, O., Walker, A. M., DeVito, M. A., Birnholtz, J., Brulé, E., Light, A., Barlas, P., Hardy, J., Ahmed, A. et al. (2019), Queer (ing) hci: Moving forward in theory and practice, in ‘Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems’, pp. 1–4.
Stokoe, E. (2018), Talk: The Science of Conversation, Robinson.
Stokoe, E. H. (2004), ‘Gender and discourse, gender and categorization: Current developments in language and gender research’, Qualitative Research in Psychology 1(2), 107–129.
Thomas, J. O., Joseph, N., Williams, A., Burge, J. et al. (2018), Speaking truth to power: Exploring the intersectional experiences of black women in computing, in ‘2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)’, IEEE, pp. 1–8.
Vincent, B. W. (2018), ‘Studying trans: recommendations for ethical recruitment and collaboration with transgender participants in academic research’, Psychology and Sexuality.