55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Can forensic science learn from the COVID-19 crisis?

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Parallel is drawn between the forensic science and the COVID-19 crises.

          • Shared approaches of the problem and solutions are identified.

          • Diagnostic methodological approach is common to medicine and forensic science.

          • Problem resolution requires critical thinking and inter-disciplinary collaborations.

          • Forensic science education has never been as needed as today.

          Abstract

          This paper draws parallels between the current COVID-19 crisis and the apparent forensic science crisis. It investigates if shared approaches of the problem and solutions could emerge. Some relevant aspects of the medical system as it reacted to the pandemic crisis and the situation in forensic science are presented. Further, three main stages of the COVID-19 crisis and its impact on individuals and society are proposed, highlighting similarities to the effects of forensic science. Finally, some lessons from COVID-19 for forensic science are identified and discussed. It is concluded that forensic science’s best assurance to address current and future challenges, particularly in an increasingly digital environment, remains a sound scientific approach, including critical thinking and inter-disciplinary collaborations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The effectiveness of the UK national DNA database

          Since the emergence of forensic DNA profiling and the corollary creation of DNA databases, efforts to maximise the efficiency and utility of DNA technology have intensified. Such efforts are expedient given the imperative that expenditure on DNA should be cost-effective and the benefits demonstrable. The practice of retaining DNA profiles in databases, either obtained from individuals involved in criminal investigations, or retrieved from suspected crime scenes, has spread globally. The UK's National DNA Database (NDNAD), created in 1995, is both one of the longest established, and biggest of such forensic DNA databases internationally. As such, it is instructive to look at whether there is evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of this DNA database. This paper thus examines efforts to gauge the effectiveness of forensic DNA databases, concluding that while the UK NDNAD may have led directly to convictions in high profile crimes, its broader impact upon public security goals remains elusive.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Forensic science 2020 – the end of the crossroads?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Is the (traditional) Galilean science paradigm well suited to forensic science?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Forensic Sci Int
                Forensic Sci. Int
                Forensic Science International
                Elsevier B.V.
                0379-0738
                1872-6283
                7 September 2020
                7 September 2020
                : 110503
                Affiliations
                [a ]Centre for Forensic Science, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
                [b ]School of Criminal Justice, University of Lausanne, bâtiment Batochime, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author.
                Article
                S0379-0738(20)30365-0 110503
                10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110503
                7475732
                ff1557ce-1f26-4d15-bab3-8afee9f707b9
                © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 3 June 2020
                : 17 August 2020
                : 3 September 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Forensic science
                trace,backlog,error rate,risk,scientific approach,inter-disciplinary collaborations
                Forensic science
                trace, backlog, error rate, risk, scientific approach, inter-disciplinary collaborations

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content365

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors13