8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sexuelle Inaktivität und sexuelle Unzufriedenheit bei Paaren in der mittleren Lebensphase nach im Mittel 31 Jahren Beziehungsdauer

      1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 1
      Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie
      Hogrefe Publishing Group

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Zusammenfassung: Theoretischer Hintergrund. Sexuelle Aktivität und Erleben verändern sich über die Lebensspanne. Unabhängig vom Alter ist ein reduziertes bzw. fehlendes sexuelles Verlangen die am häufigsten berichtete sexuelle Problematik. Es fehlen Studien an Paaren in langjährigen stabilen Partnerschaften. Fragestellung. Ziel war, die sexuelle Inaktivität und Unzufriedenheit von Paaren in der mittleren Lebensphase zu untersuchen. Methode. Es wurden Daten des 18-Jahres Follow-Ups der Längsschnittstudie „ Zukunft Familie“ verwendet. Zu diesem Zeitpunkt lebten noch N = 150 (53 %) Paare zusammen (Frauen: M = 54.1 Jahre; Männer: M = 56.5 Jahre); mittlere Beziehungsdauer: 31 Jahre. Ergebnisse. Von den Frauen gaben 39 % sexuelle Inaktivität an (erfasst über die Häufigkeit des Geschlechtsverkehrs). Mit ihrer Sexualität waren 27 % (eher) unzufrieden. Sexuelle Zufriedenheit korrelierte bei Frauen und Männern positiv mit Partnerschaftszufriedenheit, höherer Lebensqualität und guter sozialer Unterstützung sowie negativ mit Ängstlichkeit und Depressivität. Schlussfolgerungen. Sexuelle Inaktivität im mittleren Lebensalter ist von psychosozialen Faktoren abhängig. Spezifische Interventionen für betroffene Paare sollten entwickelt und evaluiert werden.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.

          Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders; however, there is no brief clinical measure for assessing GAD. The objective of this study was to develop a brief self-report scale to identify probable cases of GAD and evaluate its reliability and validity. A criterion-standard study was performed in 15 primary care clinics in the United States from November 2004 through June 2005. Of a total of 2740 adult patients completing a study questionnaire, 965 patients had a telephone interview with a mental health professional within 1 week. For criterion and construct validity, GAD self-report scale diagnoses were compared with independent diagnoses made by mental health professionals; functional status measures; disability days; and health care use. A 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7) had good reliability, as well as criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity. A cut point was identified that optimized sensitivity (89%) and specificity (82%). Increasing scores on the scale were strongly associated with multiple domains of functional impairment (all 6 Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey scales and disability days). Although GAD and depression symptoms frequently co-occurred, factor analysis confirmed them as distinct dimensions. Moreover, GAD and depression symptoms had differing but independent effects on functional impairment and disability. There was good agreement between self-report and interviewer-administered versions of the scale. The GAD-7 is a valid and efficient tool for screening for GAD and assessing its severity in clinical practice and research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The PHQ-9

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, method, and research.

              Although much has been learned from cross-sectional research on marriage, an understanding of how marriages develop, succeed, and fail is best achieved with longitudinal data. In view of growing interest in longitudinal research on marriage, the authors reviewed and evaluated the literature on how the quality and stability of marriages change over time. First, prevailing theoretical perspectives are examined for their ability to explain change in marital quality and stability. Second, the methods and findings of 115 longitudinal studies--representing over 45,000 marriages--are summarized and evaluated, yielding specific suggestions for improving this research, Finally, a model is outlined that integrates the strengths of previous theories of marriage, accounts for established findings, and indicates new directions for research on how marriages change.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie
                Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie
                Hogrefe Publishing Group
                1616-3443
                2190-6297
                January 2024
                January 2024
                : 53
                : 1
                : 24-34
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institut für Psychologie, Abteilung für Klinische Psychologie, Psychotherapie und Diagnostik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Deutschland
                [2 ]Institut für Psychologie, Fachbereich Klinische Psychologie II, Universität Kassel, Deutschland
                Article
                10.1026/1616-3443/a000746
                fceca260-83e9-4fdd-8784-ee5fd9a938ef
                © 2024

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article