4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Open Government Maturity Models: A Global Comparison

      1 , 2
      Social Science Computer Review
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          During the last decade, a new approach to bureaucratic reform in the field of public administration, open government, has aimed to increase government transparency and accountability and improve participation of citizens and other stakeholders of government. In the current era of digital governance transformations, evaluating governmental efforts to become open is a central concern of politicians, policymakers, and researchers. Various global maturity models have been developed, but the majority of them focus on the technological capacities of government rather than the historic affinity of openness and democratic governance. In this study, we attempt to address this problem by conceptualizing how governments harness technology innovations and by prescribing developmental phases for open government. Using the qualitative meta-synthesis method, we compare 10 open government maturity models to find the similarities and differences between them. Finally, we present a comprehensive model which evaluates the open government initiatives holistically and includes the following six major stages: (1) an initial stage; (2) a transparency and accountability stage; (3) an open collaboration stage; (4) a platform stage; (5) a democratic open government stage; and, finally, (6) an open governance stage.

          Related collections

          Most cited references93

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review

            Background In recent years, a growing number of methods for synthesising qualitative research have emerged, particularly in relation to health-related research. There is a need for both researchers and commissioners to be able to distinguish between these methods and to select which method is the most appropriate to their situation. Discussion A number of methodological and conceptual links between these methods were identified and explored, while contrasting epistemological positions explained differences in approaches to issues such as quality assessment and extent of iteration. Methods broadly fall into 'realist' or 'idealist' epistemologies, which partly accounts for these differences. Summary Methods for qualitative synthesis vary across a range of dimensions. Commissioners of qualitative syntheses might wish to consider the kind of product they want and select their method – or type of method – accordingly.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Social Science Computer Review
                Social Science Computer Review
                SAGE Publications
                0894-4393
                1552-8286
                August 2023
                February 25 2022
                August 2023
                : 41
                : 4
                : 1140-1165
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
                [2 ]Leiden University, The Hague, The Netherlands
                Article
                10.1177/08944393211063107
                e7e28aec-95b2-4c89-a825-fec44d05fe8c
                © 2023

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article