11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Life history consequences of miniaturization in turtles: evidence from the subfamily Kinosterninae (Testudines: Kinosternidae)

      , ,
      Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A miniaturized species is one that has endured ecological, physiological or life history costs due to small size and has implemented discrete strategies to compensate for those costs. We studied the impact of small size on the reproductive biology of the miniaturized turtle, Sternotherus minor (Kinosternidae: Kinosterninae), by exploring two alternative hypotheses that explain within-clutch trade-offs: the Optimal Egg Size Theory (OEST) and the Morphological Constraint Hypothesis (MCH). Female S. minor in this study showed a combination of reproductive parameters that support both the MCH and the OEST. Small individuals follow the MCH and larger individuals follow the OEST, fitting the previously proposed ‘threshold size-constrained’ model of egg size to female size. The large proportion of suboptimally-sized eggs (31.1%) produced in our study population is evidence that a novel strategy that compensates for very small size exists in this kinosternine turtle. Early reproduction in our study population, as well as a mobile plastron made up of a reduced number of bones and scutes in all members of this subfamily, is strong evidence of paedomorphosis, a frequent consequence of miniaturization. Re-examination of reproduction in other kinosternines will further test how this life history strategy facilitated miniaturization in testudines.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Miniaturization of Body Size: Organismal Consequences and Evolutionary Significance

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Parental Investment in Offspring in Variable Environments: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Morphological constraint on egg size: a challenge to optimal egg size theory?

              Some freshwater turtles appear unable to produce eggs large enough to achieve the balance between size and number of eggs predicted by optimal egg size theory. We present evidence that pelvic girdle structure constrains egg size and thus offspring size in females of smaller-bodied species (Chrysemys picta and Deirochelys reticularia). The constraint is demonstrated by the correspondence of slopes of the increase of the pelvic aperture and egg width with increasing body size. This constraint appears to be relaxed in a larger-bodied species (Pseudemys scripta), in which the increase in pelvic aperture relative to body size is greater than the increase in egg width. This type of structural constraint on a reproductive trait should not occur unless there is strong selection on pelvic architecture for other functions, such as locomotion, support, and limb retraction, that prevent expansion of the pelvic aperture. Although other explanations may exist for other groups of organisms that appear to vary egg size, the large variation in egg size associated with body size in some species of turtles can be reconciled with optimal egg size theory only if a pelvic constraint model is accepted.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0024-4066
                1095-8312
                March 01 2022
                February 14 2022
                January 03 2022
                March 01 2022
                February 14 2022
                January 03 2022
                : 135
                : 3
                : 558-568
                Article
                10.1093/biolinnean/blab163
                d768a7f8-9d47-416d-ae86-80fa4fe9c6ba
                © 2022

                https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article