0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Interventions to improve equity in emergency departments for Indigenous people: A scoping review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Disparities in health outcomes, including increased chronic disease prevalence and decreased life expectancy for Indigenous people, have been shown across settings affected by white settler colonialism including Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand. Emergency departments (EDs) represent a unique setting in which urgent patient need and provider strain interact to amplify inequities within society. The aim of this scoping review was to map the ED‐based interventions aimed at improving equity in care for Indigenous patients in EDs.

          Methods

          This scoping review was conducted using the procedures outlined by Arksey and O'Malley and guidance on conducting scoping reviews from the Joanna Briggs Institute. A systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and EMBASE was conducted.

          Results

          A total of 3636 articles were screened by title and abstract, of which 32 were screened in full‐text review and nine articles describing seven interventions were included in this review. Three intervention approaches were identified: the introduction of novel clinical roles, implementation of chronic disease screening programs in EDs, and systems/organizational‐level interventions.

          Conclusions

          Relatively few interventions for improving equity in care were identified. We found that a minority of interventions are aimed at creating organizational‐level change and suggest that future interventions could benefit from targeting system‐level changes as opposed to or in addition to incorporating new roles in EDs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Scoping studies: advancing the methodology

              Background Scoping studies are an increasingly popular approach to reviewing health research evidence. In 2005, Arksey and O'Malley published the first methodological framework for conducting scoping studies. While this framework provides an excellent foundation for scoping study methodology, further clarifying and enhancing this framework will help support the consistency with which authors undertake and report scoping studies and may encourage researchers and clinicians to engage in this process. Discussion We build upon our experiences conducting three scoping studies using the Arksey and O'Malley methodology to propose recommendations that clarify and enhance each stage of the framework. Recommendations include: clarifying and linking the purpose and research question (stage one); balancing feasibility with breadth and comprehensiveness of the scoping process (stage two); using an iterative team approach to selecting studies (stage three) and extracting data (stage four); incorporating a numerical summary and qualitative thematic analysis, reporting results, and considering the implications of study findings to policy, practice, or research (stage five); and incorporating consultation with stakeholders as a required knowledge translation component of scoping study methodology (stage six). Lastly, we propose additional considerations for scoping study methodology in order to support the advancement, application and relevance of scoping studies in health research. Summary Specific recommendations to clarify and enhance this methodology are outlined for each stage of the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Continued debate and development about scoping study methodology will help to maximize the usefulness and rigor of scoping study findings within healthcare research and practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mclane@ualberta.ca
                Journal
                Acad Emerg Med
                Acad Emerg Med
                10.1111/(ISSN)1553-2712
                ACEM
                Academic Emergency Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1069-6563
                1553-2712
                25 July 2024
                January 2025
                : 32
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1111/acem.v32.1 )
                : 6-19
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
                [ 2 ] Department of Emergency Medicine University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
                [ 3 ] Department of Community Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
                [ 4 ] Alberta First Nations Information Governance Centre Calgary Alberta Canada
                [ 5 ] Blackfoot Confederacy Tribal Council Standoff Alberta Canada
                [ 6 ] Strategic Clinical Networks Alberta Health Services Edmonton Alberta Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Patrick McLane, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, 790 University Terrace Building, 8303 ‐ 112 Street, Edmonton AB T6G 2T4, Canada.

                Email: mclane@ 123456ualberta.ca

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4914-4737
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4845-9182
                Article
                ACEM14987 AEMJ-24-034.R1
                10.1111/acem.14987
                11726144
                39054590
                d47cf512-b193-4f17-a080-38231c15acd3
                © 2024 The Author(s). Academic Emergency Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 18 June 2024
                : 16 January 2024
                : 05 July 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 14, Words: 8900
                Funding
                Funded by: Alberta Health Services , doi 10.13039/100007582;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2025
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.5.2 mode:remove_FC converted:13.01.2025

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article