5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Where’s the “Everyday Black Woman”? An intersectional qualitative analysis of Black Women’s decision-making regarding HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Mississippi

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Black cisgender women in the U.S. South bear a disproportionate burden of HIV compared to cisgender women in other racial and ethnic groups and in any other part of the US. Critical to decreasing new HIV infections is the improved delivery of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for Black cisgender women as it remains underutilized in 2021. Informed by intersectionality, the study sought to characterize the sociostructural influences on Black cisgender women’s deliberations about PrEP within the context of interlocking systems of oppression including racism, sexism, and classism.

          Methods

          Six focus groups were conducted with 37 Black women residing in Jackson, Mississippi. This sample was purposively recruited to include Black cisgender women who were eligible for PrEP but had never received a PrEP prescription.

          Results

          Six themes were identified as concerns during PrEP deliberation among Black women: 1) limited PrEP awareness, 2) low perceived HIV risk, 3) concerns about side effects, 4) concerns about costs, 5) limited marketing, and 6) distrust in the healthcare system. Three themes were identified as facilitators during PrEP deliberations: 1) women’s empowerment and advocacy, 2) need for increased PrEP-specific education, and 3) the positive influence of PrEP-engaged women’s testimonials. Black women shared a limited awareness of PrEP exacerbated by the lack of Black women-specific marketing. Opportunities to support Black women-specific social marketing could increase awareness and knowledge regarding PrEP’s benefits and costs. Black women also shared their concerns about discrimination in healthcare and distrust, but they felt that these barriers may be addressed by patient testimonials from PrEP-engaged Black women, empowerment strategies, and directly addressing provider biases.

          Conclusions

          An effective response to PrEP implementation among Black women in the South requires developing programs to center the needs of Black women and carry out active strategies that prioritize peer advocacy while reinforcing positive and mitigating negative influences from broader social and historical contexts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data

            D R Thomas (2006)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality-an important theoretical framework for public health.

              Intersectionality is a theoretical framework that posits that multiple social categories (e.g., race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status) intersect at the micro level of individual experience to reflect multiple interlocking systems of privilege and oppression at the macro, social-structural level (e.g., racism, sexism, heterosexism). Public health's commitment to social justice makes it a natural fit with intersectionality's focus on multiple historically oppressed populations. Yet despite a plethora of research focused on these populations, public health studies that reflect intersectionality in their theoretical frameworks, designs, analyses, or interpretations are rare. Accordingly, I describe the history and central tenets of intersectionality, address some theoretical and methodological challenges, and highlight the benefits of intersectionality for public health theory, research, and policy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                twillie2@jhu.edu
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                23 August 2022
                23 August 2022
                2022
                : 22
                : 1604
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.21107.35, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9311, Department of Mental Health, , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, ; 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.21107.35, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9311, Department of International Health, , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, ; 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.21107.35, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9311, Department of Epidemiology, , Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, ; 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.40263.33, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9094, Department of Medicine, , Brown University, ; 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI 02903 USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.47100.32, ISNI 0000000419368710, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, , Yale School of Public Health, ; 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, , Harvard University, ; 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
                [7 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
                [8 ]GRID grid.410711.2, ISNI 0000 0001 1034 1720, Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, , University of North Carolina, ; Chapel Hill, 170 Rosenau Hall, CB#7400, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7400 USA
                [9 ]MLM Center for Health Education and Equity Consulting Services, 123-A Hwy 80 East #258, Clinton, MS 39056 USA
                [10 ]GRID grid.410721.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0407, Department of Medicine, , University of Mississippi Medical Center, ; 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
                [11 ]GRID grid.40263.33, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9094, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, , Brown University, ; 121 S Main St, Providence, RI 02903 USA
                Article
                13999
                10.1186/s12889-022-13999-9
                9396836
                35999528
                be734ff8-bef6-45ea-8195-035dc3f759d8
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 17 November 2021
                : 11 August 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Public health
                black women,pre-exposure prophylaxis,hiv,racism,sexism
                Public health
                black women, pre-exposure prophylaxis, hiv, racism, sexism

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content139

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors409