52
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multiple Myeloma Incidence and Mortality Around the Globe; Interrelations Between Health Access and Quality, Economic Resources, and Patient Empowerment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The interrelation between the worldwide incidence, mortality, and survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and relevant factors such as Health Care Access and Quality (HAQ) index, gross domestic product (GDP), health care expenditures, access to cancer drugs, and patient empowerment has not been addressed before.

          Material and Methods

          Epidemiologic data were obtained from the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The mortality‐to‐incidence ratio (expressed as 1‐MIR) was used as proxy for 5‐year survival. Information on health expenditure was obtained from Bloomberg Health‐Care Efficacy ranking, the HAQ Index was used as a measure of available health care. For patient empowerment, visits to the Web site of the International Myeloma Foundation were used as proxy. Data on GDP and population per country were assessed from the International Monetary Fund and the United Nations Population Division, respectively. Possible associations were analyzed using Spearman's rank‐order correlation.

          Results

          The worldwide incidence of MM is currently 160,000, and mortality is 106,000. Age‐standardized myeloma incidence varies between 0.54 and 5.3 per 100,000 and correlates with 1‐MIR, patient empowerment, HAQ Index, and access to cancer drugs. The 1‐MIR varies between 9% and 64% and is closely related to myeloma incidence, HAQ Index, patient empowerment, access to cancer drugs, and health care expenditures.

          Conclusion

          The global incidence and outcome of MM shows significant disparities, indicating under‐recognition and suboptimal treatment in many parts of the globe. Results also highlight the importance of economic resources, access to and quality of health care, and patient education for improving diagnosis and survival of patients with MM.

          Implications for Practice

          Multiple myeloma accounts for 10% of all hematological malignancies and has moved to the forefront of clinical interest because of the significant advances in medical treatment. Diagnosis depends on laboratory tests, imaging, and professional expertise, particularly in patients without a significant M‐component. The present data show a substantial worldwide variation in incidence and mortality, that is mainly due (apart from variations due to ethnicity and lifestyle) to disparities in access to and quality of health care, a parameter strongly related to the economic development of individual countries. Improvement of quality of care and, consequently, in outcome is associated with patient empowerment.

          Abstract

          This article evaluates possible relationships between epidemiologic data on multiple myeloma and relevant factors, such as health care access and quality, economic resources, access to cancer drugs, and patient empowerment in different countries. This report informs about the complex interplay between these factors and provides the necessary basics for improving diagnosis, management, and outcome of patients with multiple myeloma in many areas of the world.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.

          The completeness of cancer registry data -- the extent to which all of the incident cancers occurring in the population are included in the registry database -- is an extremely important attribute of a cancer registry. Only a high degree of completeness in case-finding procedures will ensure cancer incidence rates and survival proportions are close to their true value. This second instalment of a two-part review of data quality methods at the cancer registry, focuses on the principles and techniques available for estimating completeness, separating methods into those that are semi-quantitative -- in that they give an indication of the degree of completeness relative to other registries or over time, and more quantitative techniques -- those that provide a numerical evaluation of the extent to which all eligible cases have been registered.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The validity of the mortality to incidence ratio as a proxy for site-specific cancer survival.

            The complement of the cancer mortality to incidence ratio [1-(M/I)] has been suggested as a valid proxy for 5-year relative survival. Whether this suggestion holds true for all types of cancer has not yet been adequately evaluated. We used publicly available databases of cancer incidence, cancer mortality and relative survival to correlate relative survival estimates and 1-(M/I) estimates from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, the USA and the Netherlands. We visually examined for which tumour sites 5-year relative survival cannot simply be predicted by the 1-(M/I) and evaluated similarities between countries. Country-specific linear regression analyses show that there is no systematic bias in predicting 5-year relative survival by 1-(M/I) in five countries. There is a small but significant systematic underestimation of survival from prognostically poor tumour sites in two countries. Furthermore, the 1-(M/I) overestimates survival from oral cavity and liver cancer with >10% in at least two of the seven countries. By contrast, the proxy underestimates survival from soft tissue, bone, breast, prostate and oesophageal cancer, multiple myeloma and leukaemia with >10% in at least two of the seven countries. The 1-(M/I) is a good approximation of the 5-year relative survival for most but not all tumour sites.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Multiple myeloma: a review of the epidemiologic literature.

              Multiple myeloma, a neoplasm of plasma cells, accounts for approximately approximately 15% of lymphatohematopoietic cancers (LHC) and 2% of all cancers in the US. Incidence rates increase with age, particularly after age 40, and are higher in men, particularly African American men. The etiology is unknown with no established lifestyle, occupational or environmental risk factors. Although several factors have been implicated as potentially etiologic, findings are inconsistent. We reviewed epidemiologic studies that evaluated lifestyle, dietary, occupational and environmental factors; immune function, family history and genetic factors; and the hypothesized precursor, monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance (MGUS). Because multiple myeloma is an uncommon disease, etiologic assessments can be difficult because of small numbers of cases in occupational cohort studies, and few subjects reporting exposure to specific agents in case-control studies. Elevated risks have been reported consistently among persons with a positive family history of LHC. A few studies have reported a relationship between obesity and multiple myeloma, and this may be a promising area of research. Factors underlying higher incidence rates of multiple myeloma in African Americans are not understood. The progression from MGUS to multiple myeloma has been reported in several studies; however, there are no established risk factors for MGUS. To improve our understanding of the causes of multiple myeloma, future research efforts should seek the causes of MGUS. More research is also needed on the genetic factors of multiple myeloma, given the strong familial clustering of the disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                heinz.ludwig@wienkav.at , heinz.ludwig@aon.at
                Journal
                Oncologist
                Oncologist
                10.1002/(ISSN)1549-490X
                ONCO
                theoncologist
                The Oncologist
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                1083-7159
                1549-490X
                07 May 2020
                September 2020
                : 25
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1002/onco.v25.9 )
                : e1406-e1413
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute Vienna Austria
                [ 2 ] International Myeloma Foundation Los Angeles California USA
                [ 3 ] CCRC Cancer Clinical Research Consulting Düsseldorf Germany
                [ 4 ] Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence: Heinz Ludwig, M.D., Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, Wilhelminenspital, Montleartstrasse 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria. Telephone: 43 676 3013377; e‐mail: heinz.ludwig@ 123456wienkav.at or heinz.ludwig@ 123456aon.at
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3302-8726
                Article
                ONCO13333
                10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0141
                7485361
                32335971
                baafdd92-d51d-4f12-a8e0-99f1bc8c9f6f
                © 2020 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 21 February 2020
                : 01 April 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Pages: 8, Words: 4131
                Categories
                18
                38
                27
                Health Outcomes and Economics of Cancer Care
                Health Outcomes and Economics of Cancer Care
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.0 mode:remove_FC converted:11.09.2020

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                multiple myeloma,incidence,mortality,mortality‐to‐incidence ratio,patient empowerment,health care quality and access

                Comments

                Comment on this article