20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fiftieth Anniversary of Uncovering the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: The Story and Timeless Lessons

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This year marks the 50th anniversary of the uncovering of the Tuskegee syphilis study, when the public learned that the Public Health Service (precursor of the CDC) for 40 years intentionally withheld effective therapy against a life-threatening illness in 400 African American men. In 2010, we learned that the same research group had deliberately infected hundreds of Guatemalans with syphilis and gonorrhea in the 1940s, with the goal of developing better methods for preventing these infections. Despite 15 journal articles detailing the results, no physician published a letter criticizing the Tuskegee study. Informed consent was never sought; instead, Public Health Service researchers deceived the men into believing they were receiving expert medical care. The study is an especially powerful parable because readers can identify the key players in the narrative and recognize them as exemplars of people they encounter in daily life—these flesh-and-blood characters convey the principles of research ethics more vividly than a dry account in a textbook of bioethics. The study spurred reforms leading to fundamental changes in the infrastructure of research ethics. The reason people fail to take steps to halt behavior that in retrospect everyone judges reprehensible is complex. Lack of imagination, rationalization, and institutional constraints are formidable obstacles. The central lessons from the study are the need to pause and think, reflect, and examine one’s conscience; the courage to speak; and above all the willpower to act. History, although about the past, is our best defense against future errors and transgressions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references95

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Hidden in Plain Sight — Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites.

            Black Americans are systematically undertreated for pain relative to white Americans. We examine whether this racial bias is related to false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites (e.g., "black people's skin is thicker than white people's skin"). Study 1 documented these beliefs among white laypersons and revealed that participants who more strongly endorsed false beliefs about biological differences reported lower pain ratings for a black (vs. white) target. Study 2 extended these findings to the medical context and found that half of a sample of white medical students and residents endorsed these beliefs. Moreover, participants who endorsed these beliefs rated the black (vs. white) patient's pain as lower and made less accurate treatment recommendations. Participants who did not endorse these beliefs rated the black (vs. white) patient's pain as higher, but showed no bias in treatment recommendations. These findings suggest that individuals with at least some medical training hold and may use false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites to inform medical judgments, which may contribute to racial disparities in pain assessment and treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              How Structural Racism Works — Racist Policies as a Root Cause of U.S. Racial Health Inequities

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Am J Respir Crit Care Med
                Am J Respir Crit Care Med
                ajrccm
                American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
                American Thoracic Society
                1073-449X
                1535-4970
                2 May 2022
                15 May 2022
                2 May 2022
                : 205
                : 10
                : 1145-1158
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois; and
                [ 2 ]Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, Illinois
                Author notes
                Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Martin J. Tobin, M.D., Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, IL 60141. E-mail: mtobin2@ 123456lumc.edu .
                Article
                202201-0136SO
                10.1164/rccm.202201-0136SO
                9872801
                35500908
                b9da9541-e043-4490-81cb-c463c8467be5
                Copyright © 2022 by the American Thoracic Society

                This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0. For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern (dgern@ 123456thoracic.org) .

                History
                : 19 January 2022
                : 8 March 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 0, References: 110, Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: Veterans Administration Research
                Award ID: 1 I01 RX002803-01A1
                Funded by: National Institute of Nursing Research, doi 10.13039/100000056;
                Award ID: R01-NR016055
                Categories
                State of the Art

                research ethics,racism,vulnerable patient groups,researcher responsibilities,medical history

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                50
                0
                23
                0
                Smart Citations
                50
                0
                23
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content345

                Cited by13

                Most referenced authors729