20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stacked CMB lensing and ISW signals around superstructures in the DESI Legacy Survey

      Preprint
      , , ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The imprints of large-scale structures on the Cosmic Microwave Background can be studied via the CMB lensing and Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) signals, which are important cosmological probes. In particular, the stacked ISW signal around supervoids with extreme diameters has been claimed in several works to be anomalously high. In this study, we use four tomographic redshift bins with 0<z<0.8 from the DESI Legacy Survey to find cluster and void superstructures, and measure the stacked CMB lensing and ISW signals around these objects. To compare our measurements with ΛCDM model predictions, we construct a mock catalogue with matched galaxy number density and bias, and apply the same photometric redshift uncertainty as the data. The consistency between the mock and data is verified via the stacked galaxy density profiles around the superstructures, and the numbers of such systems. The corresponding lensing convergence and ISW maps are then constructed and compared. The stacked lensing signal agrees with data well except for at the highest redshift bin in density peaks, where the prediction from the mock is significantly higher, by approximately a factor 1.3. The stacked ISW signal is in general consistent with the mock prediction. We do not obtain a significant signal from voids, AISW=0.10±0.69, and the signal from clusters, AISW=1.52±0.72, is at best weakly detected. However, these results are strongly inconsistent with previous claims of ISW signals at many times the level of the ΛCDM prediction. We discuss the comparison of our results with past work in this area, and investigate possible explanations for this discrepancy.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          25 May 2021
          Article
          2105.11936
          b8664962-afe6-43b7-a5f8-be3d0d4264f0

          http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

          History
          Custom metadata
          14 pages, 10 figures, submitted to MNRAS
          astro-ph.CO

          Cosmology & Extragalactic astrophysics
          Cosmology & Extragalactic astrophysics

          Comments

          Comment on this article