4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Early diagnostic model of pyonephrosis with calculi based on radiomic features combined with clinical variables

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          This retrospective aims to develop a comprehensive predictive model based on CT radiomic features and clinical parameters, facilitating early preoperative diagnosis of pyonephrosis.

          Methods

          Clinical and radiological data from 311 patients treated for upper urinary tract stones with obstructive pyelohydronephrosis, between January 2018 and May 2023, were retrospectively collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted on clinical data to identify independent risk factors for pyonephrosis. A clinical model was developed using logistic regression. The 3D Slicer software was employed to manually delineate the region of interest (ROI) in the preoperative CT images, corresponding to the area of pyelohydronephrosis, for feature extraction. The optimal radiomic features were selected to construct radiomic models and calculate the radiomic score (Radscore). Subsequently, a combined clinical–radiomic model—the nomogram—was established by integrating the Radscore with independent risk factors.

          Results

          Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified cystatin C, Hounsfield Unit (HU) of pyonephrosis, history of ipsilateral urological surgery, and positive urine culture as independent risk factors for pyonephrosis (P < 0.05). Fourteen optimal radiomic features were selected from CT images to construct four radiomic models, with the Naive Bayes model demonstrating the best predictive performance in both training and validation sets. In the training set, the AUCs for the clinical model, radiomic model, and nomogram were 0.902, 0.939, and 0.991, respectively; in the validation set, they were 0.843, 0.874, and 0.959. Both calibration and decision curves showed good agreement between the predicted probabilities of the nomogram and the actual occurrences.

          Conclusion

          The nomogram, constructed from CT radiomic features and clinical variables, provides an effective non-invasive predictive tool for pyonephrosis, surpassing both clinical and radiomic models.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12938-024-01295-z.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Random Forest

          For the task of analyzing survival data to derive risk factors associated with mortality, physicians, researchers, and biostatisticians have typically relied on certain types of regression techniques, most notably the Cox model. With the advent of more widely distributed computing power, methods which require more complex mathematics have become increasingly common. Particularly in this era of “big data” and machine learning, survival analysis has become methodologically broader. This paper aims to explore one technique known as Random Forest. The Random Forest technique is a regression tree technique which uses bootstrap aggregation and randomization of predictors to achieve a high degree of predictive accuracy. The various input parameters of the random forest are explored. Colon cancer data (n = 66,807) from the SEER database is then used to construct both a Cox model and a random forest model to determine how well the models perform on the same data. Both models perform well, achieving a concordance error rate of approximately 18%.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A comparison of random forest variable selection methods for classification prediction modeling

            Random forest classification is a popular machine learning method for developing prediction models in many research settings. Often in prediction modeling, a goal is to reduce the number of variables needed to obtain a prediction in order to reduce the burden of data collection and improve efficiency. Several variable selection methods exist for the setting of random forest classification; however, there is a paucity of literature to guide users as to which method may be preferable for different types of datasets. Using 311 classification datasets freely available online, we evaluate the prediction error rates, number of variables, computation times and area under the receiver operating curve for many random forest variable selection methods. We compare random forest variable selection methods for different types of datasets (datasets with binary outcomes, datasets with many predictors, and datasets with imbalanced outcomes) and for different types of methods (standard random forest versus conditional random forest methods and test based versus performance based methods). Based on our study, the best variable selection methods for most datasets are Jiang’s method and the method implemented in the VSURF R package. For datasets with many predictors, the methods implemented in the R packages varSelRF and Boruta are preferable due to computational efficiency. A significant contribution of this study is the ability to assess different variable selection techniques in the setting of random forest classification in order to identify preferable methods based on applications in expert and intelligent systems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000.

              In 1979, we conducted a representative study to determine the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany. Significant progress in stone therapy and changes in nutritional and environmental factors since then consequently led to a second study in 2001 under the same conditions as in 1979. A representative sample of 7500 persons from all over Germany was questioned on the occurrence of urinary stones during their lifetimes (prevalence) and on acute urolithiasis in 2000 (incidence). Additionally, data were collected on urinary stone therapy and metaphylaxis. The current data were then compared with those from 1979. Prevalence has risen from 4% to 4.7% from 1979 to 2001. 9.7% of the 50-64 year old males in 2000 had already had urinary stones (females: 5.9%). The current recurrence rate of urinary stones was estimated to be 42%. In the year 2000, the incidence of urolithiasis in Germany was found to be 1.47% (1979: 0.54%). Over 40% of the stones were passed spontaneously. There has been a marked increase in the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany within the last 22 years. This probably results from improvements in clinical-diagnostic procedures, changes in nutritional and environmental factors and a general apathy towards metabolic clarification and metaphylaxis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lyj2001353@163.com
                wxn1992@126.com
                Journal
                Biomed Eng Online
                Biomed Eng Online
                BioMedical Engineering OnLine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1475-925X
                3 October 2024
                3 October 2024
                2024
                : 23
                : 97
                Affiliations
                The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, ( https://ror.org/026e9yy16) Qingdao, Shandong, China
                Article
                1295
                10.1186/s12938-024-01295-z
                11448426
                39363370
                b5d83f5e-5a6b-4c91-8009-965b60d3bd8c
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

                History
                : 15 July 2024
                : 24 September 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: the Shandong Province medical health science and technology project
                Award ID: NO.202304051689
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Biomedical engineering
                pyonephrosis,upper urinary tract calculi,radiomics,machine learning,preoperative diagnosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content286

                Most referenced authors285