Talking to Children and Families about Chronic Pain: The Importance of Pain Education—An Introduction for Pediatricians and Other Health Care Providers
There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Chronic pain in children and adolescents is a common and debilitating health problem.
This narrative review will give a brief overview on what pediatric chronic pain is
and what treatment options there are for children and adolescents. The specific emphasis
will be on pediatric chronic pain education and communication: this narrative review
aims to show how important a good patient–health care provider relationship is—it
builds the foundation for successful communication—and how this relationship can be
established. In addition, we will present five steps that health care providers can
perform to explain pediatric chronic pain to patients and their parents and what to
keep in mind in their clinical routine. Our review is intended for pediatricians and
other health care providers who treat pediatric patients with chronic pain but might
feel uncertain on how to best communicate with them.
The current International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) definition of pain as "An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage" was recommended by the Subcommittee on Taxonomy and adopted by the IASP Council in 1979. This definition has become accepted widely by health care professionals and researchers in the pain field and adopted by several professional, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations, including the World Health Organization. In recent years, some in the field have reasoned that advances in our understanding of pain warrant a reevaluation of the definition and have proposed modifications. Therefore, in 2018, the IASP formed a 14-member, multinational Presidential Task Force comprising individuals with broad expertise in clinical and basic science related to pain, to evaluate the current definition and accompanying note and recommend whether they should be retained or changed. This review provides a synopsis of the critical concepts, the analysis of comments from the IASP membership and public, and the committee's final recommendations for revisions to the definition and notes, which were discussed over a 2-year period. The task force ultimately recommended that the definition of pain be revised to "An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage," and that the accompanying notes be updated to a bulleted list that included the etymology. The revised definition and notes were unanimously accepted by the IASP Council early this year.
The dominant model of disease today is biomedical, and it leaves no room within tis framework for the social, psychological, and behavioral dimensions of illness. A biopsychosocial model is proposed that provides a blueprint for research, a framework for teaching, and a design for action in the real world of health care.
[1
]Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital,
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA;
cosima.locher@
123456plymouth.ac.uk
[2
]Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University
of Basel, 4055 Basel, Switzerland
[3
]School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
[4
]Department of Psychosomatics and Psychiatry and Children’s Research Center, University
Children’s Hospital Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland;
Alice.Prchal@
123456kispi.uzh.ch
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed
under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license
(
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.