43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Inhibition of MYC translation through targeting of the newly identified PHB-eIF4F complex as a therapeutic strategy in CLL

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 5 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 10 , 11 , 7 , 6 , 12 , 13 , 13 , 14 , 5 , 15 , 3 , 16 , 4 , 17 , 18 , 1 , ∗∗ , 1 ,
      Blood
      The American Society of Hematology

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          • Inhibition of translation initiation prevents CLL growth in vitro and in vivo, through targeting the MYC oncogene.

          • PHBs directly interact with the translation initiation machinery, filling a gap in the understanding of the crucial roles of these proteins.

          Visual Abstract

          Abstract

          Dysregulation of messenger RNA (mRNA) translation, including preferential translation of mRNA with complex 5′ untranslated regions such as the MYC oncogene, is recognized as an important mechanism in cancer. Here, we show that both human and murine chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells display a high translation rate, which is inhibited by the synthetic flavagline FL3, a prohibitin (PHB)-binding drug. A multiomics analysis performed in samples from patients with CLL and cell lines treated with FL3 revealed the decreased translation of the MYC oncogene and of proteins involved in cell cycle and metabolism. Furthermore, inhibiting translation induced a proliferation arrest and a rewiring of MYC-driven metabolism. Interestingly, contrary to other models, the RAS-RAF-(PHBs)-MAPK pathway is neither impaired by FL3 nor implicated in translation regulation in CLL cells. Here, we rather show that PHBs are directly associated with the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)4F translation complex and are targeted by FL3. Knockdown of PHBs resembled FL3 treatment. Importantly, inhibition of translation controlled CLL development in vivo, either alone or combined with immunotherapy. Finally, high expression of translation initiation–related genes and PHBs genes correlated with poor survival and unfavorable clinical parameters in patients with CLL. Overall, we demonstrated that translation inhibition is a valuable strategy to control CLL development by blocking the translation of several oncogenic pathways including MYC. We also unraveled a new and direct role of PHBs in translation initiation, thus creating new therapeutic opportunities for patients with CLL.

          Abstract

          Exploiting the power of multiple high throughput omic analyses, Largeot and colleagues describe the consequences for human and murine chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) when protein translation initiation is inhibited. These insights suggest potential strategies to indirectly target MYC-driven proliferation for treatment of aggressive CLL.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Myc regulates a transcriptional program that stimulates mitochondrial glutaminolysis and leads to glutamine addiction.

          Mammalian cells fuel their growth and proliferation through the catabolism of two main substrates: glucose and glutamine. Most of the remaining metabolites taken up by proliferating cells are not catabolized, but instead are used as building blocks during anabolic macromolecular synthesis. Investigations of phosphoinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and its downstream effector AKT have confirmed that these oncogenes play a direct role in stimulating glucose uptake and metabolism, rendering the transformed cell addicted to glucose for the maintenance of survival. In contrast, less is known about the regulation of glutamine uptake and metabolism. Here, we report that the transcriptional regulatory properties of the oncogene Myc coordinate the expression of genes necessary for cells to engage in glutamine catabolism that exceeds the cellular requirement for protein and nucleotide biosynthesis. A consequence of this Myc-dependent glutaminolysis is the reprogramming of mitochondrial metabolism to depend on glutamine catabolism to sustain cellular viability and TCA cycle anapleurosis. The ability of Myc-expressing cells to engage in glutaminolysis does not depend on concomitant activation of PI3K or AKT. The stimulation of mitochondrial glutamine metabolism resulted in reduced glucose carbon entering the TCA cycle and a decreased contribution of glucose to the mitochondrial-dependent synthesis of phospholipids. These data suggest that oncogenic levels of Myc induce a transcriptional program that promotes glutaminolysis and triggers cellular addiction to glutamine as a bioenergetic substrate.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Translational control in cancer.

            Remarkable progress has been made in defining a new understanding of the role of mRNA translation and protein synthesis in human cancer. Translational control is a crucial component of cancer development and progression, directing both global control of protein synthesis and selective translation of specific mRNAs that promote tumour cell survival, angiogenesis, transformation, invasion and metastasis. Translational control of cancer is multifaceted, involving alterations in translation factor levels and activities unique to different types of cancers, disease stages and the tumour microenvironment. Several clinical efforts are underway to target specific components of the translation apparatus or unique mRNA translation elements for cancer therapeutics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              RNA G-quadruplexes cause eIF4A-dependent oncogene translation in cancer

              The translational control of oncoprotein expression is implicated in many cancers. Here we report an eIF4A/DDX2 RNA helicase-dependent mechanism of translational control that contributes to oncogenesis and underlies the anticancer effects of Silvestrol and related compounds. For example, eIF4A promotes T-ALL development in vivo and is required for leukaemia maintenance. Accordingly, inhibition of eIF4A with Silvestrol has powerful therapeutic effects in vitro and in vivo. We use transcriptome-scale ribosome footprinting to identify the hallmarks of eIF4A-dependent transcripts. These include 5′UTR sequences such as the 12-mer guanine quartet (CGG)4 motif that can form RNA G-quadruplex structures. Notably, among the most eIF4A-dependent and Silvestrol-sensitive transcripts are a number of oncogenes, super-enhancer associated transcription factors, and epigenetic regulators. Hence, the 5′UTRs of selected cancer genes harbour a targetable requirement for the eIF4A RNA helicase.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Blood
                Blood
                Blood
                The American Society of Hematology
                0006-4971
                1528-0020
                28 April 2023
                29 June 2023
                28 April 2023
                : 141
                : 26
                : 3166-3183
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Cancer Research, Tumor Stroma Interactions, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
                [2 ]Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
                [3 ]Laboratory of Cancer Signaling, GIGA Stem Cells, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
                [4 ]Department of Cancer Research, Cancer Metabolism Group, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
                [5 ]Department of Oncology-Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
                [6 ]Department of Infection and Immunity, Proteomics of Cellular Signaling, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
                [7 ]Molecular Hematology, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy
                [8 ]Haematology Department, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
                [9 ]Laboratoire d’hématologie, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
                [10 ]Département d’hémato-oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
                [11 ]Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
                [12 ]Department of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg
                [13 ]Department of Infection and Immunity, Immuno-Pharmacology and Interactomics, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
                [14 ]Department of Cancer Research, Multiomics Data Science, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
                [15 ]Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Weston Park Cancer Centre, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
                [16 ]WELBIO Department, WEL Research Institute, Wavre, Belgium
                [17 ]Laboratory of Clinical Cell Therapy, ULB-Research Cancer Center, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
                [18 ]Regenerative Nanomedicine Laboratory (UMR1260), Faculty of Medicine, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, INSERM-University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
                Author notes
                []Correspondence: Etienne Moussay, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 6 rue Nicolas-Ernest Barblé, L-1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg; etienne.moussay@ 123456lih.lu
                [∗∗ ]Jérôme Paggetti, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 6 rue Nicolas-Ernest Barblé, L-1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg; jerome.paggetti@ 123456lih.lu
                Article
                S0006-4971(23)00983-7
                10.1182/blood.2022017839
                10646824
                37084385
                b0b28263-9c69-47e1-87cc-7656f4a4568c
                © 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 July 2022
                : 5 March 2023
                Categories
                Lymphoid Neoplasia

                Hematology
                Hematology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content282

                Cited by6

                Most referenced authors780