46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: The aim is to compare the outcome of open versus laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir technique in patients with vesicoureteral reflux. We report a retrospective multicenter comparative study between open and laparoscopic extra-vesical ureteral reimplantation (EVUR) following Lich-Gregoir (LG) technique for the correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux (VUR).

          Materials and Methods: Between January 2007 and December 2015, 96 patients with VUR (69 females and 27 males) and deterioration of the renal function, underwent EVUR following LG technique. Fifty patients (16 males and 34 females) were operated by open surgery (group A). The mean age was 4.22 years-old, (14–147 months). Laparoscopic approach (group B) was performed in 46 patients (11 males and 35 females). The mean age was 4.19 years-old (15–110 months). We compared the results in relation to degree of VUR, operative time, hospital stay, post-operative pain medications, recovery time, complications, successful rate, recurrence, and follow-up. Statistical analysis was done used Chi square test for categorical variables and the Student t-test for continuous variables. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

          Results: In both groups no correlation was identified between age or weight and operative time, length of stay or total analgesia used. The mean operative time for group A was 63.2 and 125.4 min for unilateral and bilateral VUR, respectively, and for the group B was 127.90 and 184.5 min, respectively. There was no conversion in the laparoscopic group. Perioperative mucosal perforation of the bladder occurred in 6 patients of group A and 4 patients of group B and was immediately repaired. One patient had to be reoperated for leakage in group B. The mean duration of Morphine, IV and PO analgesia was shorter in group B. The mean hospital stay was 5.46 days for group A and 1.54 days for Group B. The success rate was 98% in group A and 97, 8% in group B. The mean follow-up was 3.67 years for the open and 1.54 years for the laparoscopic group. Transitory voiding dysfunction occurred in bilateral EVUR in one case in each group.

          Conclusion: Laparoscopic or Open approach for the correction of VUR following Lich-Gregoir technique is effective in unilateral and bilateral VUR with similar results. Laparoscopic approach reduces significantly ( p < 0.05 in each item) post-operative pain medication, hospital stay, and allows for a faster return to normal activity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children.

          The American Urological Association convened the Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux Guidelines Panel to analyze the literature regarding available methods for treating vesicoureteral reflux diagnosed following a urinary tract infection in children and to make practice policy recommendations based on the treatment outcomes data insofar as the data permit. The panel searched the MEDLINE data base for all articles from 1965 to 1994 on vesicoureteral reflux and systematically analyzed outcomes data for 7 treatment alternatives: 1) intermittent antibiotic therapy, 2) bladder training, 3) continuous antibiotic prophylaxis, 4) antibiotic prophylaxis and bladder training, 5) antibiotic prophylaxis, anticholinergics and bladder training, 6) open surgical repair and 7) endoscopic repair. Key outcomes identified were probability of reflux resolution, likelihood of developing pyelonephritis and scarring, and possibility of complications of medical and surgical treatment. Available outcomes data on the various treatment alternatives were summarized in tabular form and graphically, and the relative probabilities of possible outcomes were compared for each alternative. Treatment recommendations were based on scientific evidence and expert opinion. The panel concluded that only a few recommendations can be derived purely from scientific evidence of a beneficial effect on health outcomes. For most children the panel recommended continuous antibiotic prophylaxis as initial treatment. Surgery was recommended for children with persistent reflux and other indications, as specified in the document.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The modified sting procedure to correct vesicoureteral reflux: improved results with submucosal implantation within the intramural ureter.

            With the advent of tissue bulking agents, in particular dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Dx/HA), for endoscopic implantation for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), there has been a major shift in the surgical paradigm throughout Europe, and more recently, in the United States. We describe a modification of the technique used for implantation that has significantly improved our results. Between October 2001 and October 2003, 285 children 7 months to 15 years old (mean age 4.6 years) underwent endoscopic implantation of Dx/HA for VUR at our institutions. A modified STING (subureteral transurethral injection) procedure (implantation submucosally within the intramural ureter) was introduced during the last year of the study. The average volume of injected material was measured for each ureter. Renal sonography was performed to determine if hydronephrosis was present. At 3 months flouroscopic voiding cystourethrograms were used to evaluate for the presence of VUR. A subset of 122 patients treated with STING (52) were compared to those treated with modified STING (70). A total of 459 ureters in 231 girls and 54 boys were treated (174 bilateral cases). Mean maximum grade per patient was 2.5/5. Mean injected volume was 0.9 cc ureter. There were 181 patients with at least 3 months of followup. After 1 treatment 76% (137 of 181) of cases were cured (grade 0 reflux), while 54% (24 of 44) of the failures were improved. The overall cure rate was 94% for grade I, 85% for grade II, 78% for grade III and 71% for grade IV reflux. The patients treated with STING had a mean age of 4.8 years, mean maximum reflux grade was 2.5 and success rate was 71% (37 of 52; 86% grade I, 89% grade II, 70% grade III and 63% grade IV reflux). The patients treated with a modified STING had a mean age of 5.5 years, mean maximum grade was 2.8 and a success rate was 89% (62 of 70; 100% grade I, 92% grade II, 91% grade III and 90% grade IV reflux). Ureteral success rates were significantly (p <0.01) greater for the modified STING (92%) vs the standard STING (79%). There were no cases of hydronephrosis at 3 months postoperatively. The majority of patients undergoing minimally invasive therapy for VUR with Dx/HA are cured after 1 treatment. The modified STING is our preferred method of implant injection for the correction of VUR and in our hands produces a resolution rate of 89% (92% of ureters). The technique optimizes ureteral coaptation, is easy to perform and is not associated with any significant short-term complications. Persistence of VUR in a minority of patients continues to be the only significant adverse effect of endoscopic implantation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Vesicoureteral reflux associated renal damage: congenital reflux nephropathy and acquired renal scarring.

              The pathophysiology, evaluation, description and clinical implications of renal damage associated with vesicoureteral reflux remain controversial. We summarized the current understanding of this important aspect of clinical vesicoureteral reflux. We performed a detailed review of the literature on clinical, pathological and experimental data related to congenital vesicoureteral reflux and bladder dynamics. We also reviewed the clinical context and imaging evaluation with underlying experimental data related to post-infectious reflux nephropathy. Congenital reflux nephropathy is a pattern of impaired renal function and development with renal dysplasia as the most severe but not the only form. Mechanisms of developmental disruption are potentially related to vesicoureteral reflux dynamics during gestation and associated bladder dynamics, which may continue into postnatal life. Acquired renal injury associated with infection is related to particular bacterial and host factors that determine infection virulence, host inflammatory response and tissue recovery. As best seen on dimercapto-succinic acid scan, acute changes may resolve but may also persist as permanent renal scarring. Specific risk factors for acute pyelonephritis and renal scarring in patients with vesicoureteral reflux include higher reflux grade, dysfunctional voiding/elimination, recurrent pyelonephritic episodes and delayed initiation of antibiotic therapy. Low pressure sterile reflux is not a cause of reflux nephropathy. Renal damage associated with vesicoureteral reflux may be congenital or acquired and the respective pathophysiological mechanisms are likely different. Congenital damage is often dysplasia, which may be a result of disordered renal development secondary to significant alterations in bladder dynamics. These processes may continue into the newborn period while kidney maturation continues. Recognizing the clinical potential for ongoing effects on renal function and the role of bladder development are important for clinical care. Post-pyelonephritic acquired damage is the result of a complex interaction of host and bacterial factors that leads to acute alterations in renal function, and may lead to permanent renal scarring. Strategies for timely intervention as well as prevention are essential to limit the risk of permanent renal injury, which may predispose to hypertension and renal insufficiency in some patients. Copyright (c) 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pediatr
                Front Pediatr
                Front. Pediatr.
                Frontiers in Pediatrics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2360
                18 December 2018
                2018
                : 6
                : 388
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, King Abdulaziz University Hospital , Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
                [2] 2Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Hôtel-Dieu de France , Beirut, Lebanon
                [3] 3Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Faculty of medicine, Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, Université Saint-Joseph , Beirut, Lebanon
                [4] 4Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital , Bruxelles, Belgium
                [5] 5Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron , Barcelona, Spain
                [6] 6University Hospital of Saint Etienne , France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Marco Castagnetti, University Hospital of Padua, Italy

                Reviewed by: Marcos Raymond Perez-Brayfield, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico; Roberto Iglesias Lopes, Hospital for Sick Children, Canada; Luis Guerra, University of Ottawa, Canada

                *Correspondence: Nasir Bustangi dr_nasmb@ 123456yahoo.com

                This article was submitted to Pediatric Urology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics

                Article
                10.3389/fped.2018.00388
                6305429
                30619786
                a95c083b-9b83-4b59-974c-92e2608ed7ab
                Copyright © 2018 Bustangi, Kallas Chemaly, Scalabre, Khelif, Luyckx, Steyaert, Varlet and Lopez.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 01 September 2018
                : 26 November 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 35, Pages: 6, Words: 4074
                Categories
                Pediatrics
                Review

                vesicoureteral reflux,comparative study,open,laparoscopy,lich gregoir

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content354

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors311