4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Breaking the silence – systematic review of the socio-cultural underpinnings of men’s sexual and reproductive health in Middle East and North Africa (MENA): A handful of taboos?

      review-article
      a , b , c , d , e , f , g
      Arab Journal of Urology: An International Journal
      Taylor & Francis
      Sexual, reproductive health, culture, religion, MENA

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background

          Sociocultural aspects can impact sexual and reproductive health (SRH). Despite this, no study appraised the socio-cultural underpinnings impacting men’s SRH in MENA (Middle East and North Africa). The current systematic review undertook this task.

          Methods

          We searched PubMed and Scopus electronic databases for original articles on socio-cultural aspects of men’s SRH published from MENA. Data were extracted from the selected articles and mapped out employing McLeroy’s socioecological model. Analyses and data synthesis identified the factors impacting men’s experiences of and access to SRH.

          Results

          A total of 53 articles were included. Five related socio-cultural underpinnings intertwined with taboos were observed that affect three main SRH topics, HIV, reproduction and sexuality across three broad population groups: HCP/health services, school/university students, and the general public/patients. These underpinnings included 1) Challenges to gender equality; 2) Religious prohibitions and misinterpretations; 3) Sexual rights and taboos; 4) Masculinity and manhood ideals; and 5) Large families and consanguinity. In terms of research, a paradox exists, as we found virtually no research on four socio-cultural underpinnings of men’s SRH in MENA pertaining to: a) other STI, despite being common; b) other features of reproduction, despite that religio-cultural factors play a critical role; c) sexuality, despite the high prevalence of sexual disorders, and, d) gender-based violence, despite the widespread partner violence.

          Conclusions

          Socio-cultural underpinnings are deeply rooted across MENA population groups including HCPs, students, general public, and patients with negative impact on the perceptions and dealings pertaining to men’s SRH issues including HIV, reproduction and sexuality. The findings call for concerted widespread efforts to enhance the socio-cultural acceptance of these population groups while highlighting any misinterpretations of religious rules pertaining to men’s SRH. Moreover, breaking the silence on such issues necessitates more enthusiasm across MENA health systems, with future research examining the effects of such efforts on the socio-cultural aspects of men’s SRH in MENA.

          Related collections

          Most cited references131

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs

            During the past 20 years there has been a dramatic increase in societal interest in preventing disability and death in the United States by changing individual behaviors linked to the risk of contracting chronic diseases. This renewed interest in health promotion and disease prevention has not been without its critics. Some critics have accused proponents of life-style interventions of promoting a victim-blaming ideology by neglecting the importance of social influences on health and disease. This article proposes an ecological model for health promotion which focuses attention on both individual and social environmental factors as targets for health promotion interventions. It addresses the importance of interventions directed at changing interpersonal, organizational, community, and public policy, factors which support and maintain unhealthy behaviors. The model assumes that appropriate changes in the social environment will produce changes in individuals, and that the support of individuals in the population is essential for implementing environmental changes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Shaping attitudes about homosexuality: the role of religion and cultural context.

              Across the globe, the debate over homosexuality continues, with great variation in public opinion about the acceptability of homosexuality, laws regulating same-sex unions and penalties for homosexual sex behaviors. Religion is often seen as an important predictor of attitudes about homosexuality. However, cross-national differences in cultural orientations suggest that the role religion has in explaining homosexual attitudes may depend on a nation's cultural context. In this study, we merge ideas from cultural sociology and religious contextual effects to explain cross-national variation in public opinion about homosexuality. Using data from the fourth wave of the World Values Survey and Hierarchical Modeling techniques, we find support for the micro and macro effects of religion and a survival vs. self-expressive cultural orientation. Moreover, we find that personal religious beliefs have a greater effect on attitudes about homosexuality in countries like the United States, which have a strong self-expressive cultural orientation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Arab J Urol
                Arab J Urol
                Arab Journal of Urology: An International Journal
                Taylor & Francis
                2090-598X
                2090-5998
                13 August 2024
                2025
                13 August 2024
                : 23
                : 1
                : 16-32
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation; , Doha, Qatar
                [b ]College of Medicine, Qatar University; , Doha, Qatar
                [c ]Department of Clinical Population Health, Weill Cornell Medicine – Qatar; , Doha, Qatar
                [d ]Faculty of Medicine, St. George’s University; , Saint George’s, Grenada
                [e ]Urology Department, Hamad Medical Corporation; , Doha, Qatar
                [f ]Andrology Department, Cairo University; , Cairo, Egypt
                [g ]Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar; , Doha, Qatar
                Author notes
                CONTACT Walid El Ansari welansari9@ 123456gmail.com Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0961-1302
                Article
                2387511
                10.1080/20905998.2024.2387511
                11703040
                a2e04568-b77d-4d1c-8054-658273ad78c6
                © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, References: 145, Pages: 17
                Categories
                Review Article
                Andrology/Sexual Medicine

                sexual,reproductive health,culture,religion,mena
                sexual, reproductive health, culture, religion, mena

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content209

                Most referenced authors1,362