28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Association of Target Volume Margins with Locoregional Control and Acute Toxicities for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To investigate the association between target volume margins and clinical outcomes for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy. We reviewed records of 82 patients with inoperable NSCLC treated from 2009–2016 with concurrent chemoradiation. All patients received positron emission tomography-based treatment planning, 4-dimensional computed tomography simulation to define an internal target volume, and daily cone beam computed tomography. We quantified variations in target volume margins with a margin deviation index (MDI), calculated as the percentage change in equivalent uniform dose between the original planning target volume (PTV) and a standard reference PTV 10mm beyond the original gross tumor volume (GTV), consistent with the minimum margins mandated by recent NSCLC trials. Greater MDIs equated to smaller effective target volume margins. We dichotomized patients by the upper tercile MDI value (5.8%). Endpoints included time to locoregional progression and time to grade ≥3 radiation esophagitis (RE3) or radiation pneumonitis (RP3), modelled with the Fine-Gray method. Median follow-up was 37.8 months (range, 5.9–58.1 months). Larger MDIs correlated with smaller clinical target volume (CTV)+PTV margins, larger GTVs, later treatment year, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy use. The risk of locoregional progression did not differ for MDI ≥5.8% versus <5.8% (aHR 0.88, P =.76), while the risk of RE3 or RP3 was decreased for MDI ≥5.8% (aHR 0.27, P =.027). Patients with MDI ≥5.8% were treated with smaller CTV+PTV margins (median, 5.6mm versus 8mm, P <.0001) and a marginally lower volume of esophagus receiving ≥50 Gy (median, 31.1% versus 35.3%, P =.069). Smaller margins were used for larger tumors, yet were not associated with an increase in locoregional failures. Additional studies could clarify whether smaller margins, when used alongside modern radiotherapy techniques, decrease treatment-related toxicity for inoperable NSCLC.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Practical Radiation Oncology
          Practical Radiation Oncology
          Elsevier BV
          18798500
          August 2018
          August 2018
          Article
          10.1016/j.prro.2018.08.007
          6939676
          30144583
          9d07cc11-60fe-45a7-83f7-cf12b3010702
          © 2018

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content2,709

          Cited by6