31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Maximum bite force in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis with and without clinical established temporomandibular joint involvement and in healthy children: a cross‐sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) can be involved, resulting in dysfunction of the masticatory system. Bite force is one of the variables that reflects the function of the masticatory system. The aim of this study was to compare maximum bite force in children with JIA, with and without TMJ involvement and with healthy children.

          Methods

          Children with JIA and healthy children between the ages 6 and 18 were included in this cross‐sectional study. The clinical examination consisted of measuring the anterior maximum voluntary bite force (AMVBF), assessment of the TMJ screening protocol items and TMJ, masseter and temporal muscle palpation pain. Unadjusted linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the explanatory factors for AMVBF. Two adjusted models were constructed with corrections for age and gender differences: model 1 to compare children with JIA and healthy children and model 2 to compare children with JIA with and without TMJ involvement.

          Results

          In this cross‐sectional study, 298 children with JIA and 169 healthy children participated. AMVBF was 24 Newton (N) lower in children with JIA, when compared with healthy children (95%CI: −35.5–−12.4, = .000). When children with JIA also had clinically established TMJ involvement, AMVBF was reduced 42 N (component JIA:−16.78, 95% CI −28.96–−4.59, = .007 and component TMJ involvement:−25.36, 95% CI −40.08–−10.63, = .001). Age and male gender increased AMVBF.

          Conclusion

          Children with JIA had a reduction in the AMVBF compared with healthy children. In children with JIA and clinically established TMJ involvement, AMVBF was more reduced.

          Abstract

          This study found a considerable bite force reduction and less functioning of the TMJ in children with JIA compared to healthy children, and even more reduction of these issues in children with JIA and TMJ involvement compared to JIA without TMJ involvement. For all children, the demographic variables age, length and male gender increased the maximum bite force.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.

            This review aims to explore the research available relating to three commonly used pain rating scales, the Visual Analogue Scale, the Verbal Rating Scale and the Numerical Rating Scale. The review provides information needed to understand the main properties of the scales. Data generated from pain-rating scales can be easily misunderstood. This review can help clinicians to understand the main features of these tools and thus use them effectively. A MedLine review via PubMed was carried out with no restriction of age of papers retrieved. Papers were examined for methodological soundness before being included. The search terms initially included pain rating scales, pain measurement, Visual Analogue Scale, VAS, Verbal Rating Scale, VRS, Numerical/numeric Rating Scale, NRS. The reference lists of retrieved articles were used to generate more papers and search terms. Only English Language papers were examined. All three pain-rating scales are valid, reliable and appropriate for use in clinical practice, although the Visual Analogue Scale has more practical difficulties than the Verbal Rating Scale or the Numerical Rating Scale. For general purposes the Numerical Rating Scale has good sensitivity and generates data that can be statistically analysed for audit purposes. Patients who seek a sensitive pain-rating scale would probably choose this one. For simplicity patients prefer the Verbal Rating Scale, but it lacks sensitivity and the data it produces can be misunderstood. In order to use pain-rating scales well clinicians need to appreciate the potential for error within the tools, and the potential they have to provide the required information. Interpretation of the data from a pain-rating scale is not as straightforward as it might first appear.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use?

              The study analysed the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) to determine: 1. Were the compliance and usability different among scales? 2. Were any of the scales superior over the other(s) for clinical use?
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                w.f.c.desonnaville-3@umcutrecht.nl
                Journal
                J Oral Rehabil
                J Oral Rehabil
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842
                JOOR
                Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0305-182X
                1365-2842
                04 May 2021
                July 2021
                : 48
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1111/joor.v48.7 )
                : 774-784
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Special Dental Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] Department of Pediatric Rheumatology and Immunology Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Willemijn F. C. de Sonnaville, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, PO Box 85500, The Netherlands.

                Email: w.f.c.desonnaville-3@ 123456umcutrecht.nl

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-3993
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0540-3741
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5035-6994
                Article
                JOOR13172
                10.1111/joor.13172
                8251949
                33780558
                955724c0-ea9e-40b5-bcc2-736ec76a37a8
                © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 27 February 2021
                : 24 November 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, Pages: 11, Words: 8357
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.4 mode:remove_FC converted:02.07.2021

                Dentistry
                arthritis,bite force,child,cross‐sectional studies,juvenile,linear models,temporomandibular joint

                Comments

                Comment on this article